On Thu, Apr 16, 2015, at 02:38, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:08:32 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo
> >https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-main
> >policy section 2.2.1
> >"packages in main must not require or recommend a package outside of
> >main for compilation or execut
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: murasaki
Version : 1.68.6
Upstream Author : Kris Popendorf
* URL : http://murasaki.dna.bio.keio.ac.jp/wiki/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++, Perl
Description : homology detecti
Please remove me from your distribution list. I am retiring at the end of the
month!
Regards,
April Chapman
Product Manager, Retail Operating Systems/Platform Software
NCR Corporation
office: 770/813-3896
april.chap...@ncr.com | www.ncr.com
NCR Drivers and Patches Support Website:
http
Hello,
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
This is a scary pandora box, though :)
Jérémy.
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2015-04-16 15:45:34)
> i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization,
> where maintainers could be added.
Wouldn't surprise me, but I don't know (not interested).
> This is a scary pandora box, though :)
If you add that remark to appeace those disliking
Paul Tagliamonte (2015-04-16):
> Background
> ==
>
> Python 2 is scheduled to be EOL'd upstream officially and for good in 2020.
> We're in 2015 now (wow, that went quickly), and keeping our release cadence up
> (3 years a pop) puts Stretch up in 2018, and Buster in 2021.
Wheezy was firs
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
Which is similar in spirit to ask.debian.net.
PS. Sorry for top reply from mobile phone.
On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
> maintainers could be added.
>
> This i
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
Good one Dimitri!
I started to use Gitlab for serious work only recently, and well I love it.
So +1 from me, I volunteer to help out with that.
Cheers!
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotr
On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote:
> i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
> maintainers could be added.
there is: https://github.com/debian
> This is a scary pandora box, though :)
indeed. it could be nice, but i'd rather avoid it.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 17:11 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote:
> > i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
> > maintainers could be added.
>
> there is: https://github.com/debian
>
> > This is a scary pandora box, though :
On 04/16/2015 06:09 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider "Gogs", too. It's pretty new
and unfinished, but potentially is much better than "GitLab", IMHO.
Best rega
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:47:19PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Libdvdcss and ZFS soon in Debian?
> =
>
> We received legal advice from Software Freedom Law Center about the
> inclusion of libdvdcss and ZFS in Debian, which should unblock the
> situation in both
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
> maintainers could be added.
It would probably better to use free tools instead?
http://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/Paul
> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
Why Gitlab when there's Kallithea? :)
--
Cheers,
Andrew
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:04:07 -0600
Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian,
since we already have alioth.
Maybe someone can enlighten me.
Regards
Sven
pgphXmA_4Agbj.pgp
Description: Digitale Signat
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:15:07PM +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
>
> I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider "Gogs", too. It's pretty new
> and unfinished, but potentially is much better than "GitLab", IMHO.
>
I'm not a DD either but +1 :) I tried it out awhile back from the try site[0]and
it
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:11:29 +0200
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote:
> > i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization,
> > where maintainers could be added.
>
> there is: https://github.com/debian
I've already got a bunch of other stuff on
On 04/16/2015 09:19 PM, Alexander Alemayhu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:15:07PM +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
>> I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider "Gogs", too. It's pretty new
>> and unfinished, but potentially is much better than "GitLab", IMHO.
>
> I'm not a DD either but +1 :) I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Den 15. april 2015 11:45, skrev Riley Baird:
> While I still maintain my previous position that concatenated js
> is DFSG-free, even if it is not what upstream requires, I'm just
> wondering - what is your .orig.tar.gz? You might not need to repack
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Colin Ian King
* Package name: power-calibrate
Version : 0.01.13
Upstream Author : Colin Ian King
* URL : http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/power-calibrate/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : powe
Please CC me on all replies, I'm not subscribed to -devel
I'd like to propose a MBF on Python packages that contains a Trove
classifier that's positive Python 3, who's Debian packaging does not
build a Python 3 package.
Which is to say their upstream claims Python 3 support, but we don't
build
Andreas Noteng writes ("Re: Minified javascripts in packages"):
> Guess I'll have to start over again and figure out how to manually
> concatenate the separate upstream files into one huge file. I can see
> how it makes sense, but it also seems like a lot of work for very
> little gain…
So you pro
Hi,
from 0 to 10, what's the importance of this team ?
att,
On 04/16/2015 08:35 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Dear Developers,
I am happy to announce the creation of the Debian Outreach Team. As
highlighted below in the official delegation, the Outreach Team is
responsible for coordinating Debian
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 670 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 148 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
Heyya -devel,
If anyone has Python 2 only projects that you need a hand with porting,
we have a brand new list:
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/py3porters-devel
This list, within less than 15 hours of my posting the d-d-a mail, has
over 110 people subscribed.
Feed us. Feed
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 19:37 +0200, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:04:07 -0600
> Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
>
> I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian,
> since we already have alioth.
> Maybe someone can enl
On 2015-04-17 10:54:43, Russell Stuart wrote:
> Github has all but
> annihilated SourceForge in the hosting market place, and the stand out
> change is it's UI. That is in spite of SourceForge's impressive mirror
> network and SourceForge being VCS agnostic.
I think the VCS agnosticism is actuall
Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:44:52 Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > * Package name: wrk
> > Version : 4.0.1
> > Upstream Author : Will Glozer
> > * URL : https://github.com/wg/wrk
> > * License : Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause
> > Programming Lang: C
> >
Iustin Pop writes:
> I think the VCS agnosticism is actually detrimental in this context.
> It's much easier for the user when every repo is using the same VCS.
> And consistency makes it very easy, for example, to refer to commits
> across projects, to standardise pull/clone workflows, etc.
+1.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:49 AM, João Vanzuita wrote:
> from 0 to 10, what's the importance of this team ?
It is really quite important for bringing new people to Debian.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:40:21 -0700, Russ Allbery
wrote:
>Iustin Pop writes:
>> I think the VCS agnosticism is actually detrimental in this context.
>> It's much easier for the user when every repo is using the same VCS.
>> And consistency makes it very easy, for example, to refer to commits
>> ac
Marc Haber writes:
> Thankfully, git is by far the best VCS on the market and the vast
> majority of people seem to agree. But imagine the outcry if ten years
> ago Sourceforge had said "our VCS is svn and we don't support anything
> else".
Er, they did, didn't they? I could have sworn that the
❦ 17 avril 2015 00:32 +0100, Ian Jackson :
>> Guess I'll have to start over again and figure out how to manually
>> concatenate the separate upstream files into one huge file. I can see
>> how it makes sense, but it also seems like a lot of work for very
>> little gain…
>
> So you propose to man
❦ 16 avril 2015 21:09 +0200, Andreas Noteng :
>> While I still maintain my previous position that concatenated js
>> is DFSG-free, even if it is not what upstream requires, I'm just
>> wondering - what is your .orig.tar.gz? You might not need to repack
>> it if you can concatenate the files with
Not really. Just use the information from the grunt config to build the single
file javascript using cat. It's a sub-optimal solution because it's a lot of
work for doing something upstream allready did, and we can't run the tests. It
was actually quite easy with jQuery, working with angular and
35 matches
Mail list logo
