On 23/02/2015 19:17, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Should .a library contains non-reallocatable code?"):
>> Jeff is correct.
> ...
>> That not usually a problem. Providing that only the relevant symbols
>> are exported from the .so, the executable simply results in multiple
>> com
On 2015-02-24 11:01, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> I agree with this; are there any cases where only a static library _is_
> provided, and if so why? why not provide a .so?
One use case that was described to me was about libraries with APIs that
were not yet considered stable enough to be (properly)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libmoops-perl
Version : 0.034
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Moops
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libkavorka-perl
Version : 0.035
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Kavorka
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libreturn-type-perl
Version : 0.005
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Return-Type
* License : Artistic o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-requests-aws
Version : 0.1.6
Upstream Author : Paul Tax
* URL : https://github.com/tax/python-requests-aws
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : S3
On 02/22/2015 03:56 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Hi folks!
> Here's some news about the x32 port.
> [...]
What you've done is just awesome. I'm sure there's a ton of application,
especially on the server side. It's great to have the full power of the
64 bits arch without doubling the RAM usage (famo
Hi Andreas,
On 02/20/15 18:54, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> Is there any reason why you do not even now are talking about package
> name and upstream URL featuring the same name? Its not fruitful to
> leave your discussion partners in the dark.
>
Sorry, but I don't want to blame anybo
On 02/24/15 15:09, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Sorry, but I don't want to blame anybody producing "bad" packages.
> It shouldn't matter here.
>
Should be:
Sorry, but I don't want to blame anybody to produce "bad" packages.
Name and upstream URL shouldn't matter here.
Sorry for my bad English.
R
(I have reordered Bernard's mail and my responses to try to produce a
coherent whole.)
Bernhard R. Link writes ("Re: Should .a library contains non-reallocatable
code?"):
> [examples not involving -Bsymbolic]
My view is that when trying to build a shared library that depends on
a static library,
Jeff Epler writes ("Re: Should .a library contains non-reallocatable code?"):
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:19:30PM -0600, Jeff Epler wrote:
> > * foomodule is a Python wrapper for libfoo, so it must be shipped
> >as a .so, but if it links libfoo.a, and libfoo.a is not -fPIC,
> >it is not p
Quoting Harald Dunkel (2015-02-24 15:09:15)
> On 02/20/15 18:54, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Is there any reason why you do not even now are talking about package
>> name and upstream URL featuring the same name? Its not fruitful to
>> leave your discussion partners in the dark.
>>
>
> Sorry, but I
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:55:35PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I disagree: We won't hide problems.
>
> (Sure I agree that we shouldn't throw blame, but that's on you to
> collide those two, not me)
The "bad" packages Harald is talking about, I think, are external to
Debian — I don't think h
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libmoosex-xsaccessor-perl
Version : 0.007
Upstream Author :
* URL :
* License :
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : use Class::
Jonathan Dowland writes ("Re: conflicts between Debian's and upstream's Debian
package"):
> The "bad" packages Harald is talking about, I think, are external to
> Debian — I don't think he's trying to protect a DD here. So this is
> courtesy rather than hiding problems.
I don't think reference to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libdevel-strictmode-perl
Version : 0.003
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Devel-StrictMode
* License :
* Ian Jackson [150224 15:50]:
> > You still pollute the ABI with the details of the internals:
> >
> > if you try to change main.c to:
> > #include
> > #include "foo1.h"
> > #include "bar2.h"
> > int main() {
> > double rr1;
> > foo(&rr1);
> > int r1 = rr1;
> > int r2 = bar2();
> > pri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libperlx-assert-perl
Version : 0.904
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/PerlX-Assert
* License : Artistic
Bernhard R. Link writes ("Re: Should .a library contains non-reallocatable
code?"):
> Ian Jackson [150224 15:50]:
> > + gcc -Wall main.c -L. -lbar1 -lbar2
>
> You forgot to change that line as I said to change it.
Ah yes, sorry. I can reproduce the problem that way.
It works if I say
gcc -Wa
Forgot to add debian-devel back in the loop
On 02/24/2015 10:29 AM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 06:44:54 + Nick Papior Andersen
> wrote:
>
>> In my experience many of the features are quite similar.
>>
>> However,
> netcdf4-python has the advantage of full CDF4 capabilities.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: liblexical-accessor-perl
Version : 0.008
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Lexical-Accessor
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libtypes-xsd-lite-perl
Version : 0.005
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Types-XSD-Lite
* License : Arti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-zaqarclient
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : http://github.com/openstack/python-zaqarclient
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Descript
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libtypes-xsd-perl
Version : 0.005
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Types-XSD
* License : Artistic or GP
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libdatetimex-auto-perl
Version : 0.008
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/DateTimeX-Auto
* License : Arti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libuniversal-ref-perl
Version : 0.14
Upstream Author : Joshua ben Jore
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/UNIVERSAL-ref
* License : Arti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libdatetime-incomplete-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Flavio S. Glock
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/DateTime-Incomplete
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Sébastien Villemot"
* Package name: r-cran-rsdmx
Version : 0.4.5
Upstream Author : Emmanuel Blondel
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rsdmx/index.html
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: R
Description
Hi,
Am 24.02.2015 um 11:01 schrieb Alastair McKinstry:
> I agree with this; are there any cases where only a static library _is_
> provided, and if so why? why not provide a .so?
In libvxi-dev I provide a -fPIC .a library only, mainly for size reasons
(the library consists of RPC proxy/stub code
> The netcdf4-python package is the only one described as having
> implemented most of the newest features of NetCDF-4. It was actually
> modelled on the Scientific.IO.NetCDF module API.
netCDF4 module is required by basemap, so it'll be nice to have it in
the archive.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libmoosex-mungehas-perl
Version : 0.007
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/MooseX-MungeHas
* License : Ar
31 matches
Mail list logo
