Hi Mike,
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014, at 19:57, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On Mi 09 Jul 2014 19:44:39 CEST, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Thank you for your efforts.
> >
> > If you plan on doing this transition for Jessie, please do keep the "5th
> > of September" deadline in min
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Fontaine
* Package name: apachedex
Version : 1.6.2
Upstream Author : Vincent Pelletier
* URL : http://git.erp5.org/gitweb/apachedex.git
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Compute APDE
Hi Guillem,
I have just tested that patch in our setup here, and it appears to
alleviate the need for the Linux::Pid perl module perfectly.
Whereas previously Apache would fail to start if Apache2::SizeLimit
was used (which Bugzilla does) it is now able to start fine.
Thanks,
Ben Cooksley
KDE Sy
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Riley
* Package name: gmastermind.app
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Marko Riedel
* URL : http://gap.nongnu.org/gmastermind/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: Objective C
Description : GNUstep clone of Mastermi
* Johannes Schauer , 2014-07-09, 16:50:
==> llvm-toolchain-3.4_3.4.1-4.arch-all.unusedbd.real <==
automake=1:1.14.1-3
autotools-dev=20140510.1
diffstat=1.58-1
doxygen=1.8.7-1
flex=2.5.39-7
lcov=1.10-1
libtool=2.4.2-1.7
patchutils=0.3.3-1
procps=1:3.3.9-5
sharutils=1:4.14-2
tcl=8.6.0+8
texinfo=5.2
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-10 12:45:36)
> * Johannes Schauer , 2014-07-09, 16:50:
> >should build dependencies which the source package only requires after
> >setting some DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS go into Build-Depends?
>
> Probably not, unless it's one of the optioned blessed by Policy §4.9.1.
>
Hi,
Quoting Steve Langasek (2014-07-09 00:32:18)
> But it absolutely does have this effect if we add bootstrap-specific metadata
> unnecessarily, because:
>
> - it introduces a syntax incompatibility with older versions of the package
>tools
we are currently trying to get a minimal change t
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:27:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
>> Perhaps some of this could be put into devscripts ?
>
> Just as ick, DNS is the place for service aliases.
And how do you propose to deal with the ssh fingerprint mess when the dns
is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kent Baxley
* Package name: sblim-sfcc
Version : 2.2.7
Upstream Author : Dave Heller
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/sblim
* License : Eclipse Public License v1.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : Provide
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: libjs-twitter-bootstrap-datepicker
Version : 0.0.0.1
Upstream Author : Stefan Petre
* URL : http://www.eyecon.ro/bootstrap-datepicker/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Javascript
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kent Baxley
* Package name: cim-schema
Version : 2.41.0
Upstream Author : Distributed Management Task Force (DMTF)
* URL : http://www.dmtf.org/standards/cim
* License : DMTF
Programming Lang: Managed Object Format (MOF)
* Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:27:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >
> >> Perhaps some of this could be put into devscripts ?
> >
> > Just as ick, DNS is the place for service aliases.
>
> And how do you propose to deal wit
]] Jon Bernard
> * Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:27:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > >
> > >> Perhaps some of this could be put into devscripts ?
> > >
> > > Just as ick, DNS is the place for service aliases.
> >
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kent Baxley
* Package name: sblim-sfc-common
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Dave Heller
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/sblim
* License : EPL-1.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : sfc Common libraries
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 588 (new: 2)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 134 (new: 0)
Total number of packages request
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Might have been implemented for the last 5+ years too.
A clarification:
The Debian sysadmins have had SSHFP records in DNS (and DNSSEC) for a long time.
In addition you can get the full list of SSH public keys for Debian machines:
sftp:
16 matches
Mail list logo