On 2014-06-22 06:21, Russell Stuart wrote:
Don't understand what you talk about... AFAICS you can't download any
netinst images via https at all.
Hmm. You are right. The situation is worse than I thought.
Well, there are debian-installer-$VER-netboot-$ARCH in oldstable and
stable.
Kind re
* Sylvestre Ledru [140622 00:50]:
> Currently, LLVM default binaries are managed by the llvm-defaults package
> (similar to gcc-defaults).
> To sum up, we have binaries like /usr/bin/llvm-nm-X.Y. llvm-defaults
> provides symlinks /usr/bin/llvm-nm to the actual binaries.
> Usually, I manage 3 versi
Hi Christoph,
On Sonntag, 22. Juni 2014, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > one or two bug reports might be oh so more useful than posting on -devel.
> #752275 and #752277
thanks for these!
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sun, 2014-06-22 at 12:27 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sonntag, 22. Juni 2014, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > > one or two bug reports might be oh so more useful than posting on -devel.
> > #752275 and #752277
>
> thanks for these!
To be honest, Holger, I don't know why you've asked m
On Sun, 2014-06-22 at 14:21 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
> Sure, but you are no longer discussing a PKI system here. If you are
> going to abandon X.509 PKI
Well first of all,... PKI is just "public key infrastructure" and not
necessarily means X.509.
> , why not just use OpenPGP and just have
>
Hi Christoph,
On Sonntag, 22. Juni 2014, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> To be honest, Holger, I don't know why you've asked me to report these
> issues at all, [...]
so they are tracked and easy to be referenced - #752275 is way better than
several message-ids on lists.d.o.
> But now I just
On Sun, 2014-06-22 at 15:49 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-06-22 at 14:21 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
> > Sure, but you are no longer discussing a PKI system here. If you are
> > going to abandon X.509 PKI
> Well first of all,... PKI is just "public key infrastructure" and
Hi,
For some of the packages I maintain, I get a "Git ERROR" showing.
Clicking on the "Git" link shows a working git repository. Clicking on
the "ERROR" link shows:
Error: debian/changelog not found in branches master debian
well, there's no "debian" nor "master" branch stored in at all, and IMO
Thomas Goirand writes:
> For some of the packages I maintain, I get a "Git ERROR" showing.
> Clicking on the "Git" link shows a working git repository. Clicking on
> the "ERROR" link shows:
> Error: debian/changelog not found in branches master debian
> well, there's no "debian" nor "master" br
On 06/23/2014 12:02 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Thomas Goirand writes:
>
>> For some of the packages I maintain, I get a "Git ERROR" showing.
>> Clicking on the "Git" link shows a working git repository. Clicking on
>> the "ERROR" link shows:
>
>> Error: debian/changelog not found in branches mast
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:16:07PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> The name of the pseudo-package was exactly what I was missing. Thanks
> Russ!
For future reference, the footer of the PTS reads "Report problems to
the qa.debian.org pseudopackage in the Debian BTS". Adding similar
footer notes is
11 matches
Mail list logo
