Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Leo Iannacone
* Package name: apt-venv
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Leo Iannacone
* URL : https://github.com/LeoIannacone/apt-venv
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : apt virtual environ
Hi,
Cameron Norman:
> I understand just fine how it is packaged. It is packaged in a way that
> pushes components down other's throats and tells users to simply disable
> them if they are not necessary.
So? The standard case is that they're either not really optional,
or they passively sit aroun
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: KAction
* Package name: xcape
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Albin Olsson
* URL : https://github.com/alols/xcape
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : use a modifier key as another key
xcape allows
Le 04/05/2014 23:15, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 01:59:09PM +0200, Solal wrote:
>> I think we shouldn't support proprietary software creaters
>
> Who's 'we'?
"We" in the official list of Debian developers means... The Debian
developers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> [CCing debian-devel to get feedback on a de facto 'standard' tool].
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 03:34:29PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59:04PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Tue, 14 Jan
> …and firmware.
+1
--
Salvo Tomaselli
"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno."
-- Galileo Galilei
http://ltworf.github.io/ltworf/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-r
No +1 because proprietary firmware is unethical too.
Le 05/05/2014 17:28, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
>> …and firmware.
> +1
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.de
On 5 May 2014 11:03, Leo Iannacone wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Leo Iannacone
>
> * Package name: apt-venv
> Version : 0.1.0
> Upstream Author : Leo Iannacone
> * URL : https://github.com/LeoIannacone/apt-venv
> * License : GPL-3
> Pr
previously on this list Matthias Urlichs contributed:
> The second case is a no-brainer. Many packages in Debian consist of more
> than one binary, of which you need at most one (if that). Do you really
> want to mass-file a bug against all of these _and_ the packages depending
> on them, or are y
Dimitri John Ledkov wrote...
> Should we start transition to gnutls28 by default, for all packages
> that are compatible?
Given the fact libgnutls26 has issues like #708174 and cannot handle
SHA-512 signed certificates as issued by CACert¹: Yes, please let's
get rid of that old stuff whereever po
In data lunedì 5 maggio 2014 17:30:01, Solal ha scritto:
> No +1 because proprietary firmware is unethical too.
So don't install it and don't tell me what should I think.
Cheers
--
Salvo Tomaselli
"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intel
On 5 May 2014 17:58, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> How is it different from "chdist" utility from the devscripts package
> that allows apt-cache lookups and more?
>
> http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/trusty/en/man1/chdist.1.html
I did not know "chdist", but .. after a quick look I can say
"apt-
On 05/05/2014 05:30 PM, Solal wrote:
> No +1 because proprietary firmware is unethical too.
hmm, have you read the post you are replying to and what the "+1" was
referring to?
and please do stop top-posting...
fgmards
IOhannes
PS: am i just feeding the troll?
signature.asc
Description: Open
* "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" , 2014-05-05, 18:58:
PS: am i just feeding the troll?
Yes.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 05:36:53PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I cannot imagine *any* example of a bug reported reported according to
> guidelines being a waste of time.
>
> Can you provide examples of that kind of response?
I remember it happening only once, and it was quite a while ago.
previously on this list Bas Wijnen contributed:
> Which means that if the maintainer is unable to do that, the response "please
> forward this upstream" should be interpreted (and perhaps more clearly
> written)
> as "sorry I don't have time, this is how you can try to make things happen
> yourse
Hi all,
my development system running unstable failed to start X server after an
dist-upgrade two days ago.
After a bit of investigation I found out that the radeon module is not
loaded at bootup anymore. To get the graphical login back, the following
commands as root were needed:
# modprobe
"IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" writes:
...
> and please do stop top-posting...
s/top-//
pgpuflwoBqD8u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 00:08 +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> my development system running unstable failed to start X server after
> an dist-upgrade two days ago.
>
> After a bit of investigation I found out that the radeon module is not
> loaded at bootup anymore. To get the graphi
Hello,
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [snip]
>
> The second case is a no-brainer. Many packages in Debian consist of more
> than one binary, of which you need at most one (if that). Do you really
> want to mass-file a bug against all of these _and_ the packages
Le Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:56:48PM +0200, Bas Wijnen a écrit :
>
> I'm happy to see that there is consensus anyway that forwarding bugs upstream
> is the task of the maintainer.
Hi all,
being a package maintainer, I am always uncomfortable when I have the
impression that I am considered like a h
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Leo Iannacone wrote:
> It has been developed to provide user with a full virtual environment,
> where you can run any command/script you want.
> If fact, it launches a new `bash` session with a custom APT_CONFIG
> environment variable, which forces apt to use a dif
Solal dijo [Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:14:54PM +0200]:
> >> I think we shouldn't support proprietary software creaters
> >
> > Who's 'we'?
>
> "We" in the official list of Debian developers means... The Debian
> developers.
So... Who are you? We¹ would like to know.
¹ "We" in the context of a mail
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:56:48PM +0200, Bas Wijnen a écrit :
>>
>> I'm happy to see that there is consensus anyway that forwarding bugs upstream
>> is the task of the maintainer.
>
> Hi all,
>
> being a package maintainer, I am always uncom
On 05/02/2014 06:17 PM, David Goodenough wrote:
> On Friday 02 May 2014 11:32:41 Maximiliano Curia wrote:
>> ¡Hola Paul!
>>
>> El 2014-05-02 a las 08:40 +0800, Paul Wise escribió:
>>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
For quite a while now the KDE team has been severely
25 matches
Mail list logo
