Bjørn Mork writes:
> Is there such a beast with feature parity? vacation has a few nice
> defaults, like ignoring list mails and only sending one message per week
> to each receiver. Having every end user implement similar behaviour in
> sieve isn't likely to happen.
>
> The world has become a l
Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> Bjørn Mork writes:
>> Is there such a beast with feature parity? vacation has a few nice
>> defaults, like ignoring list mails and only sending one message per week
>> to each receiver. Having every end user implement similar behaviour in
>> sieve isn't likely to happ
Jonas Smedegaard jones.dk> writes:
> Quoting Michael Kaserer (2014-01-08 11:00:50)
> > We are two students currently working on a research project regarding
> > motivation for contributing to Open Source projects. You can help us
> > by filling out the following web-survey, it only takes max. 2
Bjørn Mork writes:
> Ansgar Burchardt writes:
>> Bjørn Mork writes:
>>> Is there such a beast with feature parity? vacation has a few nice
>>> defaults, like ignoring list mails and only sending one message per week
>>> to each receiver. Having every end user implement similar behaviour in
>>>
On 01/13/2014 05:25 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>> On Jan 12, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>>
>>> It still seems to have a fair number of loyal users though. I see your
>> popcon says 1867 have it installed, but only 222 "voted".
>>
>>> If we do have such a
>>> replac
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 01:06:33PM +, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> [Replying to an old message]
>
> 20.12.2013 19:29, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >retitle 726551 ITA: microcom - minimalistic terminal program
> >owner 726551 !
> >thanks
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >my colleagues and I are using microcom muc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexandre Rossi
* Package name: sockjs-twisted
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Christopher Gamble
* URL : http://github.com/Fugiman/sockjs-twisted
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Simple l
Not sure if this is the proper list, but this is broken:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d-i/trunk/packages/partman/partman-crypto/README?op=file
Which is from the 'Documentation for hackers' link.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> Jonas Smedegaard jones.dk> writes:
>
>> Quoting Michael Kaserer (2014-01-08 11:00:50)
>> > We are two students currently working on a research project regarding
>> > motivation for contributing to Open Source projects. You can help us
>> > by filling out the following
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:25 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
> Not sure if this is the proper list, but this is broken:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d-i/trunk/packages/partman/partman-crypto/README?op=file
>
> Which is from the 'Documentation for hackers' link.
... here:
https://wiki.debian.org/Deb
shawn wilson (2014-01-13):
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:25 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
> > Not sure if this is the proper list, but this is broken:
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d-i/trunk/packages/partman/partman-crypto/README?op=file
> >
> > Which is from the 'Documentation for hackers' link.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Olivier Sallou
* Package name: minia
Version : 1.6067
Upstream Author : Rayan
* URL : http://minia.genouest.org
* License : CeCILL
Programming Lang: C
Description : short-read assembler
Minia is a short-read ass
> Thorsten Glaser writes:
>
> > Jonas Smedegaard jones.dk> writes:
> >
> >> Quoting Michael Kaserer (2014-01-08 11:00:50)
> >> > We are two students currently working on a research project regarding
> >> > motivation for contributing to Open Source projects. You can help us
> >> > by filling o
Marco d'Itri writes ("Re: removal of the vacation package"):
> On Jan 12, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > The set of bugs looks tractable to me. Do you have a half-prepared
> > upload somewhere or is the versionn in the archive the most recent ?
>
> No, I have really ignored it since december 2003.
> If y
On Jan 13, Ian Jackson wrote:
> OK. I will take it. Would you prefer me to do an upload right away
> to change the Maintainer or can it wait (weeks very likely) until I've
> had a chance to do some actual work on it ?
No hurry.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Johannes Schauer
* Package name: fuseloop
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Johny Mattsson
* URL : https://github.com/jmattsson/fuseloop
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : loopback mount using FUSE
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jorge Soares
* Package name: snp-sites
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Andrew Page https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/snp_sites
* License : (GPL, MIT)
Programming Lang: (C++)
Description : Find snp sites from multi fasta ali
Hi,
Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a dead upstream?
Maybe this question should go to debian-release instead?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
Hi Daniel, and thanks for the insightful response,
Le samedi, 11 janvier 2014, 14.22:28 Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit :
> There is a fourth way forward -- loath though i am to propose it --
> which is to avoid enabling TLS in CUPS at all until upstream gets
> their act together and does something se
On Jan 13, Svante Signell wrote:
> Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
> much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a dead upstream?
Do you need more reasons?
> Maybe this question should go to debian-release instead?
Maybe you should send patches ins
On 01/13/2014 05:38 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
> Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
> much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a dead upstream?
The 7 RC bugs are the exact reason:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xpdf/news/20131208T163914Z.html
Thi
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:38:21 +0100
Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear.
No, it will be removed from testing. That means that new users won't
have it available but anyone who already has it installed is welcome
to it, with all it's bugs. apt does not remove
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:59 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:38:21 +0100
> Svante Signell wrote:
> > I like that program very
> > much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a dead
> > upstream?
>
> That's 7 entirely sufficient reasons and one problem that arguably
Hi Svante,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:19:21PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:59 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:38:21 +0100
> > Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > > I like that program very
> > > much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a de
Svante Signell writes ("Re: xpdf removed from testing?"):
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:59 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > That's 7 entirely sufficient reasons and one problem that arguably makes
> > fixing the other seven harder. So 7.5 reasons to remove it from testing.
>
> OK; OK, I understand com
previously on this list Svante Signell contributed:
> Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
> much.
I like it too but it's save dialog is pretty terrible. Have you checked
out mupdf. No save but similar otherwise.
p.s. qpdfview is shaping up and remembers tabs too.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:19:21 +0100
Svante Signell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:59 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:38:21 +0100
> > Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > > I like that program very
> > > much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a dead
> > > upstream
>> I like that program very
>> much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a dead
>> upstream?
> That's 7 entirely sufficient reasons and one problem that arguably makes
> fixing the other seven harder. So 7.5 reasons to remove it from testing.
I just want to say that I like the approa
* Svante Signell , 2014-01-13, 17:38:
Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs,
For very small values of 7. :-)
a dead upstream?
The last xpdf release was in 2011, the previous one in 2007. Upstream
certainly
Svante Signell writes:
> OK; OK, I understand completely. As a follow-up: according to popcon
> there are about 10 000 installations of that package. Any
> interest/chance that patches will help re-introduce this package, or is
> it just a waste of effort? What is the opinion of the maintainers?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Breno Leitao
* Package name: iprutils
Version : 2.3.15
Upstream Author : Brian King
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/iprdd/
* License : Common Public License Version 1.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : T
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 19:25 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Svante Signell , 2014-01-13, 17:38:
> >Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
> >much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs,
>
> For very small values of 7. :-)
There are seven, but five of them are
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Piotr Ożarowski"
* Package name: python-changelog
Version : 0.3.4
Upstream Author : Michael Bayer
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/changelog
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Sphinx ext
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: coldtobi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar
Version : 20140113
Upstream Author : Thomas Vogt, with contributions by Philip Witte and Mathieu
LutfyName
* URL
> > Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
> > much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a dead upstream?
> Do you need more reasons?
Actually *1* RC bug that was introduced by replacing the proper xpdf
code with linking to poppler - a moving target that
Le mardi 14 janvier 2014 à 07:16 +0900, Norbert Preining a écrit :
> Yes, xpdf works very well. THose people having problem should simple
> compile a version from upstream without the pesty Debian changes to
> link against poppler, and it will work again.
And as a bonus, the PDF exploits will wor
On 01/13/2014 11:38 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> That would be quite a bold move to take. The one aspect that puzzles me
> most is: in which ways "no TLS security" is better than "incompletely
> secure TLS"?
if the only axis we're measuring along is cryptographic security, then
protecting
Quoting Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org):
> With mailbot from courier-maildrop, it's easy to do for a .mailfilter
> file (though it'd be once per recipient, which is IMO enough, I don't
You have an interesting definition of "easy", Thomas..:-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dima Kogan
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libx11-windowhierarchy-perl
Version : 0.004
Upstream Author : Tom Molesworth
* URL or Web page : https://metacpan.org/pod/X11::WindowHierarchy
* License : GPL/Artistic (same as Perl)
Description : Pe
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dima Kogan
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libx11-protocol-other-perl
Version : 28
Upstream Author : Kevin Ryde
* URL or Web page : http://user42.tuxfamily.org/x11-protocol-other/index.html
* License : GPL3+
Description : miscellaneous X11::Pr
Hi Russ,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:43:50AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> While someone could fix the package, you may want to consider not doing
> so. After running into endless bugs in xpdf, I personally switched to
> mupdf for a light-weight PDF reader and found it superior in every respect
> e
41 matches
Mail list logo
