❦ 31 décembre 2013 01:30 CET, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) :
>> Any thoughts?
> The correct solution is completing #652459, which mounts /usr in the
> initramfs.
It is quite unclear why this bug is stalled.
--
Let the machine do the dirty work.
- The Elements of Programming Style (
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-bioc-gviz
Version : 1.6.0
Upstream Author : Florian Hahne, Steffen Durinck, e.a.
* URL : http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/Gviz.html
* License : Artistic-2.0
Programming
On 2013-11-29 04:14, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
Hi Steve,
Sorry for the long overdue answer,
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:04:56PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> kFreeBSD was a technology preview, and has not generated enough user
>> interest to bring in sufficient install base to conti
On 31 December 2013 08:11, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 31 décembre 2013 01:30 CET, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) :
>
>>> Any thoughts?
>> The correct solution is completing #652459, which mounts /usr in the
>> initramfs.
>
> It is quite unclear why this bug is stalled.
I believe there were reservat
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dimitri John Ledkov
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libnih.la
Version : 1.0.4 (git snapshot)
Upstream Author : Dimitri John Ledkov (DD), Scott James Remnant (DD)
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/xnox/libnih/tree/kfreebsd
http://libnih.la/
* License
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 03:50:06AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> Apart from the termination clause, the GPLv2 is far more concise,
> I don't see tivoization as a problem (it's the software I want to
> protect, not anyone's combination of it with hardware), nor do I care
> about compatibility with
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 03:50:06AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
>> Apart from the termination clause, the GPLv2 is far more concise,
>> I don't see tivoization as a problem (it's the software I want to
>> protect, not anyone's combination of i
Matt,
Yes, it is possible, but only the contributions of the fork would be
GPLv3 only, the original GPLv2+ code would still be just that.
Nevertheless, the final product would be GPLv3 only.
Cameron Norman
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Matt Zagrabelny
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:5
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 08:59:53AM -0600, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 03:50:06AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> >> Apart from the termination clause, the GPLv2 is far more concise,
> >> I don't see tivoization as a probl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tonnerre LOMBARD
* Package name: libjs-optparse
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Johan Dahlberg
* URL : http://github.com/jfd/optparse-js
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : Command-line
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I wonder, how is the release team measuring this? For the other ports that
>> you mention, you've pointed to concrete technical problems that are in line
>> with the previously-documented release qualification guidelines. kfreebsd,
>> OTOH,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tonnerre LOMBARD
* Package name: node-static
Version : 0.7.2
Upstream Author : Alexis Sellier
* URL : https://github.com/cloudhead/node-static
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : RFC2616
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tonnerre LOMBARD
* Package name: sockjs-client
Version : 0.3.4
Upstream Author : Marek
* URL : http://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : WebSocket emulati
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Ransom
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libb2
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : cont...@blake2.net
* URL : https://blake2.net/
* License : mostly CC0, but some files currently have no licen
14 matches
Mail list logo
