Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Dandrimont
* Package name: vcversioner
Version : 1.13.0.0
Upstream Author : Aaron Gallagher <_...@habnabit.org>
* URL : https://github.com/habnabit/vcversioner
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: Python
Descript
On 2013-12-22 00:13, gregor herrmann wrote:
* Package name: libtap-simpleoutput-perl
Version : 0.002
Upstream Author : Chris Weyl
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/TAP-SimpleOutput
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : simple clo
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 14:07:00 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >* Package name: libtap-simpleoutput-perl
> > Description : simple closure-driven TAP generator
> >
> >TAP::SimpleOutput provides one function, counters(), that returns
> >a number of
> >simple closures designed to help output TAP
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 19:31, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
> > On 2013-12-21 18:04:19 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> That said, the display managers in Debian other than kdm and gdm are not
> >> ready for systemd at the moment. I had to switch to gdm3 to use systemd
> >> (by whic
On 28 November 2013 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * Architecture Status
>* ia64 in danger
>* sparc/ppc/mips/kfreebsd at risk
>* s390 dropped from testing
Is "ppc" - powerpc or ppc64?
Is ppc64 looking healthy enought to become a release architecture for jessie?
What about x32? Is it g
Dimitri John Ledkov (2013-12-22):
> On 28 November 2013 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > * Architecture Status
> >* ia64 in danger
> >* sparc/ppc/mips/kfreebsd at risk
> >* s390 dropped from testing
>
> Is "ppc" - powerpc or ppc64?
powerpc. (For ppc64, same answer as below.)
> Is p
❦ 22 décembre 2013 14:41 CET, "Milan P. Stanic" :
> Really odd. With my testing/unstable installation on amd64 and armhf
> (Asus TF101 tablet) systemd and lightdm combo works without any problem
> for nearly a year.
I am also using lightdm + systemd because slimd has some problems when
started
"Milan P. Stanic" writes:
> Really odd. With my testing/unstable installation on amd64 and armhf
> (Asus TF101 tablet) systemd and lightdm combo works without any problem
> for nearly a year.
It's possible I had some local configuration issue of which I was unaware.
I'll probably give it another
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Toby Smithe
* Package name: pyviennacl
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Toby Smithe
* URL : http://viennacl.sourceforge.net/pyviennacl.html
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++, Python
Description : Python bind
Hello,
Debian ist still relying heavily on GnuTLS 2.12.x, and I do not think
this is sustainable for much longer.
State of Play:
-
In July 2011 with version 3.0 [1] GnuTLS switched to Nettle as only
supported crypto backend. Nettle requires GMP.
GnuTLS and Nettle are available under LGPL
This email is not so much about the change of init system but just about
the multiple-instance problem, regardless of which init we use. It is
not a huge hassle but it is something that could be handled more smoothly.
Some packages provide a way to start multiple instances in one shot from
their
Hi Felipe,
On 12/18/2013 07:10 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:10:11 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>> Hi Felipe,
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
>>
>> I did not checked whether xbmc would be compliant to Debian Multimedia
>> policy. My statement was written under the assumption that the p
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 08:12:40PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> How to continue from here/solve this:
> -
> #1 Fork LGPLv2.1+ GMP (version 4.2.1) for Debian.
This seems like the best idea, as it lets us use newer versions of
GnuTLS that support elliptic curves with the minimum amount of
Daniel Pocock writes:
> This email is not so much about the change of init system but just about
> the multiple-instance problem, regardless of which init we use. It is
> not a huge hassle but it is something that could be handled more
> smoothly.
> Some packages provide a way to start multiple
On 22/12/13 21:03, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Daniel Pocock writes:
>
>> This email is not so much about the change of init system but just about
>> the multiple-instance problem, regardless of which init we use. It is
>> not a huge hassle but it is something that could be handled more
>> smoothly.
Andreas Metzler schrieb:
> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
(..)
> #5 was how Fedora looked at the OpenSSL library issue. Since Debian
> has another viewpoint on OpenSSL I somehow doubt we would use it for
> GMP.
We should do that (and also reevaluate the position wrt OpenSSL) by
running
Daniel Pocock writes:
> Just to clarify: does this mean systemd and upstart can refer to the
> instances collectively or individually as required? E.g. you can tell
> it restart all instances of httpd (on dpkg upgrade) or just restart one
> specific instance (after a config change)?
It looks li
Moritz Mühlenhoff writes:
> Andreas Metzler schrieb:
>> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
> (..)
>> #5 was how Fedora looked at the OpenSSL library issue. Since Debian
>> has another viewpoint on OpenSSL I somehow doubt we would use it for
>> GMP.
> We should do that (and also reevaluate
On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 19:52 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 08:12:40PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > How to continue from here/solve this:
> > -
> > #1 Fork LGPLv2.1+ GMP (version 4.2.1) for Debian.
>
> This seems like the best idea, as it lets us use newer ver
severity 724731 serious
thanks
Hi,
This is really becoming an issue: I still cannot run the latest gdm3
together with gnome, meaning that gdm3 is still borked. lightdm is the
rescue here: this is the _third_ box showing the same problem :( Logging
in works, but the screen is frozen, e,g, iconizin
On 12/22/2013 11:22 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
> This is really becoming an issue: I still cannot run the latest gdm3
> together with gnome, meaning that gdm3 is still borked.
Could you be more specific, please?
I'm using gdm3 without any issues all the time on two different
machines running unsta
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:22:35PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> severity 724731 serious
> thanks
>
> This is really becoming an issue: I still cannot run the latest gdm3
> together with gnome, meaning that gdm3 is still borked.
Debian-devel is not a user support forum. If you cannot deal
On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 23:30 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:22:35PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > severity 724731 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > This is really becoming an issue: I still cannot run the latest gdm3
> > together with gnome, meaning that gdm3 is still
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libemail-sender-transport-smtps-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Fayland Lam
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Emai
reopen 724731
thanks
On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 23:30 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/22/2013 11:22 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
> > This is really becoming an issue: I still cannot run the latest gdm3
> > together with gnome, meaning that gdm3 is still borked.
>
> Could you be more speci
Le 22 déc. 2013 22:00, "Ben Hutchings" a écrit :
>
> On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 19:52 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 08:12:40PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > How to continue from here/solve this:
> > > -
> > > #1 Fork LGPLv2.1+ GMP (version 4.2.1) for Debian.
>
On Dec 22, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> We should do that (and also reevaluate the position wrt OpenSSL) by
> running it by the Software Freedom Law Center.
>
> Red Hat has real lawyers who looked into the issue, we should do the
> same.
Agreed, Debian has been promoting bad decisions due to deve
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:48:47PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> upstart calls this "instances" and systemd calls this "unit
> templates".
We too call them instances: an instance is created from a template.
> Daniel Pocock writes:
>
> > Just to clarify: does this mean systemd and upstart can refe
On 22 December 2013 16:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Dimitri John Ledkov (2013-12-22):
>> On 28 November 2013 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> > * Architecture Status
>> >* ia64 in danger
>> >* sparc/ppc/mips/kfreebsd at risk
>> >* s390 dropped from testing
>>
>> Is "ppc" - powerpc or
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> But this should be safe for instance units, so I'd like to see
> 'systemctl stop/status/... server@*.service' implemented.
That would be very useful for distribution packagers. If, for example,
you support a multiple-instance Tomcat configuration (which is
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:25:40AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 22, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > We should do that (and also reevaluate the position wrt OpenSSL) by
> > running it by the Software Freedom Law Center.
> > Red Hat has real lawyers who looked into the issue, we should do the
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:25:40AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> On Dec 22, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>>> We should do that (and also reevaluate the position wrt OpenSSL) by
>>> running it by the Software Freedom Law Center.
>>> Red Hat has real lawyers who looked into t
My gut reaction was that #5 or #6 are the best option (leaning to #6). However
I guess I don't understand what making something a system library effects the
license?
Andreas Metzler wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Debian ist still relying heavily on GnuTLS 2.12.x, and I do not think
>this is sustainable for
Svante Signell writes:
> On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 23:30 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:22:35PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
>> > severity 724731 serious
>> > thanks
>> >
>> > This is really becoming an issue: I still cannot run the latest gdm3
>> > together with
On 2013-12-22 09:31:09 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Milan P. Stanic" writes:
> > Really odd. With my testing/unstable installation on amd64 and armhf
> > (Asus TF101 tablet) systemd and lightdm combo works without any problem
> > for nearly a year.
>
> It's possible I had some local configuratio
On 12/23/13 02:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:25:40AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 22, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
We should do that (and also reevaluate the position wrt OpenSSL) by
running it by the Software Freedom Law Center.
Red Hat has real lawyers who looked
Le 23/12/2013 00:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
It looks like both upstart and systemd don't provide direct mechanisms to
manage all instances.
That's true (I'm only speaking about systemd). There have been requests for
such functionality before, but nothing was implemented. But I thi
On 2013-12-22 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> In July 2011 with version 3.0 [1] GnuTLS switched to Nettle as only
> supported crypto backend. Nettle requires GMP.
> GnuTLS and Nettle are available under LGPLv2.1+. GMP used to be
> licensed LGPLv2.1+ ages ago but upgraded to LGPLv3+ in version 4.2
38 matches
Mail list logo
