On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Mike Gabriel
wrote:
> @Reinhard: please note that we in X2Go currently work on a multimedia
> implementation that requires mplayer on the client side. It would be a shame
> (disclaimer: /me has not fully read all postings in this thread) if
> mplayer(1) would disap
On 12/21/2013 11:47 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Mike Gabriel
> wrote:
>> @Reinhard: please note that we in X2Go currently work on a multimedia
>> implementation that requires mplayer on the client side. It would be a shame
>> (disclaimer: /me has not fully read a
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
On Jo, 19 dec 13, 12:47:52, Jorge Soares wrote:
> Package: snp-sites
> Version: 1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I would like to regiater my intent to package the software snp-sites
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 7.2
> APT prefers sta
Hi John Paul,
A week ago Reinhard started this thread, explicitly referencing mpv.
You quoted that, sidestepping to your own pet issue:
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2013-12-14 23:53:05)
> On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> - Alternatives exist (mplayer2, mpv)
>
> Well, t
Hi Jonas!
On 12/21/2013 01:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> A week ago Reinhard started this thread, explicitly referencing mpv.
> You quoted that, sidestepping to your own pet issue:
>
> Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2013-12-14 23:53:05)
>> On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/21/2013 07:36 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Jonas!
>
> On 12/21/2013 01:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> A week ago Reinhard started this thread, explicitly referencing
>> mpv. You quoted that, sidestepping to your own pet iss
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2013-12-21 13:36:12)
> On 12/21/2013 01:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> A week ago Reinhard started this thread, explicitly referencing mpv.
>> You quoted that, sidestepping to your own pet issue:
[proof snipped - see earlier post for details]
>> ...and now
On 12/21/2013 02:11 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Because you sidestepped (read: hijacked) the original post.
I did not. I was simply elaborating what the actual problem is. mplayer
is broken and unmaintained and so is xbmc and the actual reason is not
that those projects are unmaintained upstream
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes ("Re: Bug#732159: Should this package be
removed?"):
> On 12/21/2013 02:11 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Because you sidestepped (read: hijacked) the original post.
>
> I did not. I was simply elaborating what the actual problem is. mplayer
> is broken and unmai
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2013-12-21 14:56:38)
> On 12/21/2013 02:11 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Because you sidestepped (read: hijacked) the original post.
>
> I did not. I was simply elaborating what the actual problem is.
Fine. Subject is this: Should [the mplayer] package be rem
Ian Jackson schrieb:
> Jonas: Is your view that the packages which aren't working properly
> with libav (including mplayer) should be removed from Debian ?
mplayer doesn't need to be removed because of any compatibility issues
with libav. It FTBFSes for entirely unrelated reasons since 9 months (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/21/2013 11:08 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Ian Jackson schrieb:
>
>> Jonas: Is your view that the packages which aren't working properly
>> with libav (including mplayer) should be removed from Debian ?
>
> mplayer doesn't need to be remo
2013/12/21 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz :
> mplayer2 is badly maintained as compared to mplayer, don't know
> anything about mpv though. Just learned about it as of today,
> in fact.
mplayer2 looks more portable to me
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Quoting The Wanderer (2013-12-21 18:30:54)
> On 12/21/2013 11:08 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>
>> Ian Jackson schrieb:
>>
>>> Jonas: Is your view that the packages which aren't working properly
>>> with libav (including mplayer) should be removed from Debian ?
Thanks for snapping me out of meta
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtap-simpleoutput-perl
Version : 0.002
Upstream Author : Chris Weyl
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/TAP-SimpleOutput
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtest-moose-more-perl
Version : 0.022
Upstream Author : Chris Weyl
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Test-Moose-More
*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tonnerre LOMBARD
* Package name: golang-rrd
Version : 0.0~git20131112
Upstream Author : Michał Derkacz
* URL : http://github.com/ziutek/rrd/
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Go bindings
I'm replying to an old message, but...
On 2013-10-23 23:06:39 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 10:30 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > Of course I can install the package but don't have to switch init= to
> > it, nevertheless it seems that already this alone adds sever
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> I've spent several hours to find what was wrong with lightdm, and
> eventually found the culprit earlier today: just the fact that the
> systemd package was installed! So, yes, systemd currently breaks things,
> even if it is not used (I don't use GNOME itself, sometimes
On 2013-12-21 18:04:19 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
> > I've spent several hours to find what was wrong with lightdm, and
> > eventually found the culprit earlier today: just the fact that the
> > systemd package was installed! So, yes, systemd currently breaks things,
> >
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> On 2013-12-21 18:04:19 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> That said, the display managers in Debian other than kdm and gdm are not
>> ready for systemd at the moment. I had to switch to gdm3 to use systemd
>> (by which I mean booting with it) because neither slim nor lightdm
21 matches
Mail list logo
