Control: reassign -1 wnpp
Control: retitle -1 ITP: expect-lite -- easy to use version of expect
Control: owner -1 Craig Miller
On Jo, 14 nov 13, 12:39:04, Craig Miller wrote:
> Package: expect-lite
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Please add expect-lite package to Squeeze & Wheezy
>
On 14 November 2013 18:25, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Anybody can help to test whether the out current webkit workable?
>
> Maybe by install epiphany-browser and use it?
>
> All of my board/laptops are working as build nodes.
>
>
We'll see if we can run it up on our 3A laptop today. We've not modified
On 14 November 2013 18:54, David Daney wrote:
> On 11/14/2013 03:31 AM, Graham Whaley wrote:
> [...]
>
> Hi David,
>> out of interest, do you know if there are any commercially (ideally
>> easily and cheaply ;-) available boards out there that can run Octeon
>> little endian?
>>
>
> I don't kn
Hello everyone!
As the latest packaged Subversion in Debian is now 1.8.4 and it seems
that the maintainer doesn't care updating it by now (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725787), I've recently
packaged svn 1.8.4 and serf 1.3.2 (which is needed by svn) by myself.
I've neve
On 2013-11-15 8:32, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 14 nov 13, 12:39:04, Craig Miller wrote:
Please add expect-lite package to Squeeze & Wheezy
[...]
Since you will be the Maintainer of the package I think you wanted to
file an ITP (Intent to Package) and not an RFP (Request to package).
Please p
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:11:27PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> So you save a small number of inodes, and get problems if the filesystem's
> layout is unconventional. Such savings don't seem to be worth the trouble
> to me.
I was questioning the existence of said trouble. I still do that. If the
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
> I've never tried to perform any package maintenance, but I would be very
> happy to contribute these packages to Debian... (NMU?)
>
> What are the next steps for it? Should someone (some maintainer?) review
> it?
Yes, someone n
Package: general
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
After running apt-get dist-upgrade, my laptop does not suspend properly:
Problems:
1) key shortcut - used to work (standard shortcut, worked out of the box), now
instead suspending, it causes screen lock
2) menu option - used to be above power off
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 729659 upower
Bug #729659 [general] general: problem with laptop suspend after dist-upgrade
Added indication that 729659 affects upower
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
729659: http
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Brown
* Package name: xemacs21
Version : 21.4.22
Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, elisp
Description : highly customizable text edit
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> * Package name: xemacs21
> Version : 21.4.22
Wasn't this removed just one month ago?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725883
Berto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:19:17 +0100
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> The tar file format supports hard links. Thus technically Debian
> packages can contain hard links. A significant number of packages
> including key packages such as bzip2, gzip, and ifupdown use this
> technique. While same-direct
Hello,
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:42:18 +0100
Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > The tar file format supports hard links. Thus technically Debian
> > packages can contain hard links. A significant number of packages
> > including key packages such as bzip2, gzip, and ifupdown use this
> > technique. While sa
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:16:19AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> For instance the publican package saved 3/4 of its binary package
> size. If this were a problem, then maybe we should have seen a bug
> report.
I'm not sure that making a general rule based on an edge-case is a
good idea. Publican
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
> As the latest packaged Subversion in Debian is now 1.8.4 and it seems
> that the maintainer doesn't care updating it by now (see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725787),
A little over a month ago is not long e
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On 2013-11-15 8:32, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
>> On Jo, 14 nov 13, 12:39:04, Craig Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Please add expect-lite package to Squeeze & Wheezy
>>>
>> [...]
>
> Since you will be the Maintainer of the package I think you wanted to
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:29:50PM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > * Package name: xemacs21
> > Version : 21.4.22
> Wasn't this removed just one month ago?
Yes, this is why I'm ITPing it.
signature.asc
Description: Di
Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
On Nov 15, 2013 9:10 AM, "Mark Brown" wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:29:50PM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > * Package name: xemacs21
> > > Version
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:17:34AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
Don't top post.
> Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
Yes, of course. Well, the one that was there when I looked is fixed,
I'll see if the BTS tells me about any open ones after the reupload.
signa
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:01:46PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:17:34AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> Don't top post.
I was on my phone, thanks for the advice.
> > Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
>
> Yes, of course. Well, the one
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> bugs?
By making changes to the software.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> > Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> > bugs?
>
> By making changes to the software.
No need to CC me, I'm subscribed.
This
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> > Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> > bugs?
>
> By making changes to the software.
This discussion is getting a tad too ant
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> I was on my phone, thanks for the advice.
I laboriously quote-post from my phone all the time. Emails should be
optimised for the reader, rather than the writer.
> No, I don't think it's wise to let this back in the archive befor
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > > Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> > > bugs?
> > By m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 729659 upower
Bug #729659 [general] general: problem with laptop suspend after dist-upgrade
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'upower'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #729659 to the same values
previously set
Igno
reassign 729659 upower
# if it affects upower those maintainer know better than the '"general"
# maintainers' what to do with this bug...
thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Looking at publican a number of questions occur to me
>
> * why hardlink all of the contents of
>/usr/share/doc/publican/Users_Guide/desktop/$LOCALE/Common_Content
>together rather than symlink them to some common directory like
>/usr/sha
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:50:05PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I'm not sure that making a general rule based on an edge-case is a
> good idea. Publican is not very popular at all, it's quite likely
> that none of the 70 or so people who have installed it have done
> anything unusual with moun
On 15 November 2013 12:02, Mark Brown wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mark Brown
>
> * Package name: xemacs21
> Version : 21.4.22
> Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
> URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
> License : GPL
> Programming
Le Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
>
> I'd have to look at the RC bugs.
>
> I'm looking for a hard commitment here
Hi Paul,
I think that if you focused on the compliance with the DFSG, then the NEW queue
could empty quicker.
It is a big problem, and it is also
Hi,
I have attached two patches for espeakedit:
0001-*.patch -- This makes espeakedit compile.
0002-*.patch -- This fixes a segfault when constructing the wxFont
objects for SpectFrame. These were being constructed in the global
namespace. With wxWidgets 3.0, it now requires a gtk+ window when
c
There was a nice bunch of (5-digit) bugs being closed with the removal,
they should be unarchived, reopened and handled properly if xemacs comes
back.
from https://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt:
=
[Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013
Hi,
I have attached two patches for espeakedit:
0001-*.patch -- This makes espeakedit compile.
0002-*.patch -- This fixes a segfault when constructing the wxFont
objects for SpectFrame. These were being constructed in the global
namespace. With wxWidgets 3.0, it now requires a gtk+ window when
c
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 09:44:51AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
> > I'd have to look at the RC bugs.
> >
> > I'm looking for a hard commitment here
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I think that if you focused on the compliance with the DFSG, t
35 matches
Mail list logo
