Hi,
I am searching for a solution for this scenario:
nsd3 (<= 4.0.0), e.g. from 3.2.x postrm script _remove_ "nsd" user
nsd3 (>= 4.0.0) is just a dummy package with hard depends on nsd (>=
4.0.0)
nsd (>= 4.0.0) creates "nsd" user in postinst and remove "nsd" user in
postrm
If nsd3 package is upg
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:16:10 +0100
Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am searching for a solution for this scenario:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621833
Generally, I avoid even trying to remove system users during package
removal. Remove the files for that user but not the user
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Now the "nsd" user has been removed in nsd3.postinst, but it is still
> needed by nsd (>= 4.0.0) package. Any ideas how to fix that? Or should I
> just cross the fingers and hope nobody would do such thing?
You probably shouldn't ever remove users.
Cheer
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013, at 13:55, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> > Now the "nsd" user has been removed in nsd3.postinst, but it is still
> > needed by nsd (>= 4.0.0) package. Any ideas how to fix that? Or should I
> > just cross the fingers and hope nobody would
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013, at 13:55, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> >
> > > Now the "nsd" user has been removed in nsd3.postinst, but it is still
> > > needed by nsd (>= 4.0.0) package. Any ideas how to fix that? Or sh
]] Ondřej Surý
> Now the "nsd" user has been removed in nsd3.postinst, but it is still
> needed by nsd (>= 4.0.0) package. Any ideas how to fix that? Or should I
> just cross the fingers and hope nobody would do such thing?
As others have said: stop removing the user, but also, rm the old postrm
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:52:35PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Generally, I avoid even trying to remove system users during package
> removal. Remove the files for that user but not the user itself. (What
> harm does it do to leave the user defined?)
This seems very sensible and pragmatic, but y
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013, at 14:37, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Ondřej Surý
>
> > Now the "nsd" user has been removed in nsd3.postinst, but it is still
> > needed by nsd (>= 4.0.0) package. Any ideas how to fix that? Or should I
> > just cross the fingers and hope nobody would do such thing?
>
> As
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot
* Package name: php-sabre-event
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Evert Pot
* URL : https://github.com/evert/sabre-vobject
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : lightweight lib
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot
Control: block -1 by 729432
* Package name: php-sabre-http
Version : 2.0.0~alpha5
Upstream Author : Evert Pot
* URL : https://github.com/evert/sabre-vobject
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: PHP
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:32:28PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013, at 14:37, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Ondřej Surý
> >
> > > Now the "nsd" user has been removed in nsd3.postinst, but it is still
> > > needed by nsd (>= 4.0.0) package. Any ideas how to fix that? Or should I
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Agustin Henze
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Hi all, I'm adopting this package and I'll upload the new upstream release
(2.0.0) with big changes in the packaging. The main change is that it'll only
generate 2 bina
12 matches
Mail list logo
