Hi Bill,
Bill Allombert wrote (07 Oct 2013 22:04:21 GMT) :
> I am concerned that in the event a package is removed from testing,
> the people most interested with restoring the package will miss the
> removal, since the package will stay installed on their systems.
I believe there are good chance
> On 8 Oct 2013, at 07:58, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> The removal is simply one way to fix
> the RC bug
I'm broadly in favour of this course of action but in no way does it fix the
bugs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Hi,
On 08-10-13 11:14, Просветов Евгений wrote:
> What should I do now?
You are asking the wrong forum. This e-mail list is for development of
Debian. If you have trouble installing third-party software, you should
ask this third-party. If you really insist on asking help from Debian,
you could r
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Bill Allombert wrote:
I am concerned that in the event a package is removed from testing,
the people most interested with restoring the package will miss the
removal, since the package will stay installed on their systems.
Would this be addressed by building some mechanism
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > I am concerned that in the event a package is removed from testing,
> > the people most interested with restoring the package will miss the
> > removal, since the package will stay in
I cannot install libdb4.8-dev + libdb4.8, because it conflicts with libdb5.1.
This does not seem to be true, the dev packages conflict but afaict the
libraries themselves (at least the versions from debian squeeze and
wheezy) do not. So as long as you don't need libdb5.1-dev installed you
shou
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 07:58:03AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> rc-alert has existed for quite some time and it gets the alert in
> *ahead* of package removal. It alerts users to the real problem - the
> RC BUG!
Did you try to run rc-alert recently ? The output is totally overwhelming
for somethi
Le 08/10/2013 18:46, Geoffrey Thomas a écrit :
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
>> I am concerned that in the event a package is removed from testing,
>> the people most interested with restoring the package will miss the
>> removal, since the package will stay installed on their syst
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
* Package name: netmate
Version : 0.16
Upstream Author : Robert Krause
* URL : https://github.com/Rup0rt/netmate
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: C
Description : netdude clone that show
Dear developpers,
Is there other people still using gpm intensively (the console mouse selection
system) ? The Debian package is unmaintained and the upstream project is not
very active either.
GPM does not support 'clickpads' found in newer laptop (there is no button
available for pasting). Th
Bill Allombert, le Tue 08 Oct 2013 23:44:26 +0200, a écrit :
> Is there other people still using gpm intensively (the console mouse selection
> system) ?
Not very intensively, but I do use it when I don't start X.
> GPM does not support 'clickpads' found in newer laptop (there is no button
> avai
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 19:36:57 +
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 07:58:03AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > rc-alert has existed for quite some time and it gets the alert in
> > *ahead* of package removal. It alerts users to the real problem -
> > the RC BUG!
>
> Did you try to
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:44:26PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear developpers,
>
> Is there other people still using gpm intensively (the console mouse selection
> system) ? The Debian package is unmaintained and the upstream project is not
> very active either.
I do, but I don't have any h
On 07/10/13 23:04, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I am concerned that in the event a package is removed from testing,
> the people most interested with restoring the package will miss the
> removal, since the package will stay installed on their systems.
> This, then, cause stable releases to be missing p
Le Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:51:42PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a
écrit :
>
> I really doubt that possibly interested people will subscribe to all the
> packages they are interested in.
Hello everybody,
in one way or the other, there will always be some people who miss the
inform
On Tue, 08 Oct 2013, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
> Would this be addressed by building some mechanism (making tombstone
> packages comes to mind, but there are many options) for apt to
> prompt to remove packages that were removed in the archive?
It is already addressed by the user-oriented package man
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 07:36:57PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Did you try to run rc-alert recently ? The output is totally overwhelming
> for something that is to run on several computers and several times by
> month. Most of the bugs are reported against important packages that cannot
> be rem
17 matches
Mail list logo
