Hello, is checking for the environment variable ADTTMP the recommended
way to test if a test is being run by adt-run? It seems to work, but
I'd like to know if there is a better way or not.
I've many packages with a decent "test" target already, run at build
time. In case this target is run by a
On 2013-09-16 10:38, Enrico Tassi wrote:
> Hello, is checking for the environment variable ADTTMP the recommended
> way to test if a test is being run by adt-run? It seems to work, but
> I'd like to know if there is a better way or not.
>
> I've many packages with a decent "test" target already,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:00:01AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > I've many packages with a decent "test" target already, run at build
> > time. In case this target is run by adt-run I want it to behave in
> > a slightly different way. For exmample I don't want to set env
> > variables so that n
On Monday 16 September 2013 00:35:52 Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:15:20AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Bump. Is there any problem?
>
> Hey there Pali,
>
> First of all, thank you for your hard work and persistence - I
> admire that a great deal! Keep that up!
>
>
> One i
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:16:40AM -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
> I was interested in doing some ongoing analysis of historical RFS
> processing, and ran into trouble getting the archived bug information.
One option I didn't see mentioned in this thread is the rsync method
documented here:
http://
Hi,
This is really not Debian-related, except insofar as the software in
question is something that might have been in Debian one day. I talked
about that with people on debian-med recently. So, it is technically
off-topic.
However, I thought that maybe people on these lists would have some
I am not a lawyer but I don't think facts are copyrightable. In some
jurisdictions there are "database rights" and copyright on collections
of facts (like phone books) that could apply here. I suggest you
consult the lawyers for your research institute for the legal
situation in your jurisdiction.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=sponsorship-requests&archive=both
>
> lists all of the bugs. The oldest being #657303, and newer ones.
>
> If you give archive=yes, you only get archived bugs.
>
>
Ok, I've verified t
On 16/09/2013 11:31, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Hi,
This is really not Debian-related, except insofar as the software in
question is something that might have been in Debian one day. I talked
about that with people on debian-med recently. So, it is technically
off-topic.
I posted a reply on stackexc
* Enrico Tassi , 2013-09-16, 11:20:
Looking at the doc of adt-run, the only observable difference seems to be the
presence of ADTTMP.
Indeed.
But maybe a more polite way would be to ask something like `adt --is-running`
and let adt implement it as it likes.
There's a hidden assumption here
* Steve Langasek , 2013-09-15, 13:54:
I'm having problems with one of my packages that includes a python module.
The package is vips. I am not a python person, so this may be simple.
The last time I built the package, there were several module binary files
that got installed appropriately. F
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Steve Langasek , 2013-09-15, 13:54:
>>> I'm having problems with one of my packages that includes a python
>>> module. The package is vips. I am not a python person, so this may
>>> be simple.
>>>
>>> The last time I built the package, there were several module binary
>>> f
It looks like both you and the site you wish to access are based in
France, so please forgive this US-centric intrusion.
Under US law, it may be the case that violating website terms of service
is a felony crime with jail time attached.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/01/rebooting-computer-crim
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 03:08:12PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >But maybe a more polite way would be to ask something like `adt
> >--is-running` and let adt implement it as it likes.
>
> There's a hidden assumption here that adt is the only thing that
> will ever run the tests.
Correct me if I'm w
Jeff Epler writes:
> Under US law, it may be the case that violating website terms of
> service is a felony crime with jail time attached.
The USA Federal courts have made it clear that this is not the case. As
far as I know there have been no convictions or even prosecutions under
this theory.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: libplack-middleware-assets-railslike-perl
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Yoshihiro Sasaki
* URL :
https://github.com/ysasaki/p5-plack-middleware-assets-railslike
* License : Artistic o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: libcatmandu-rdf-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Jakob Voß
* URL : https://github.com/nichtich/Catmandu-RDF
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description :
17 matches
Mail list logo
