This message and the file attached to the message, was NOT sent to the
recipient, because it contains an "Executable Attachment" file type that is
currently being blocked. A copy was also sent to the Quarantine folder
“EXEstrip”.
Subject: [Virus email-worm:w32/mydoom.gen!a] Returned mail: see
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-bioc-biostrings
Versioy : 2.28.0
Upstream Author : H. Pages
* URL :
http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.12/bioc/html/biostrings.html
* License : Artistic-2.0
Programming Lang: R
Descrip
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-bioc-genomicranges
Version : 1.12.4
Upstream Author : P. Aboyoun
* URL :
http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.12/bioc/html/genomicranges.html
* License : Artistic-2.0
Programming Lang: R
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-bioc-affy
Version : 1.38.1
Upstream Author : Rafael A. Irizarry
* URL : http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.12/bioc/html/affy.html
* License : Artistic-2.0
Programming Lang: R
Descripti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marius Gavrilescu
* Package name: rateit
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Jean-Marc Valin
* URL : http://rateit.sourceforge.net/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Programming Lang: C
Description : Tool for
Am Dienstag, den 03.09.2013, 22:18 -0700 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> tony mancill writes:
>
> > Thank you for pointing this out. I just recently uploaded a script,
> > splitpatch, that I argued should be accepted as-is (i.e. as a "micro
> > package") because of the dependency on ruby.
>
> > Given t
Hi Moritz,
On Do 29 Aug 2013 19:25:57 CEST Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Indeed, actions speak louder than words. Here's four specific packages,
where the security team could need some help for an oldstable-security
update:
[...]
- Several Drupal 6 fixes need to be backported
[...]
I can help wit
Package: general
Followup-For: Bug #508644
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* Wha
On 08/29/2013 07:18 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please start with helping supporting the current stable release better:
>
> http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezy&rc=1 shows 255 RC bugs in
> wheezy, just four months after this counter was basically at zero.
Hi,
As much as I would
On 04/09/13 at 12:13 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mi, 04 Sep 2013, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > How much do those packages weigh, Norbert? Are TeX transitional
> > packages particularly heavy?
>
> In kg? In bit? In work time?
>
> > I really don't know why you think TeX is exempt from the usua
On Mi, 04 Sep 2013, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > requirements to support clean upgrades between Debian releases.
> - texlive-lang-danish gets removed (as well as texlive-common
> and texlive-doc-base), but texlive-lang-european doesn't get
> installed.
Yes, and? Was the dist-upgrade disturbed?
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 4. September 2013, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Yes, and? Was the dist-upgrade disturbed?
> We are talking about normal systems, that is having telxive or texlive-full
> installed. Not pathological cases of only t-l-d installed.
wheezy has:
Package: texlive-lang
Binary: texlive-lan
On Mi, 04 Sep 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> which other binary packages build by texlive-lang do you consider
> "pathological to use"?
I considered the installation of one -lang package by itself without
actual latex package pathological.
> Holger, who considers just to build-depend on texl
On 04/09/13 at 20:52 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mi, 04 Sep 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > which other binary packages build by texlive-lang do you consider
> > "pathological to use"?
>
> I considered the installation of one -lang package by itself without
> actual latex package pathologi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-sockjs-tornado
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Serge S. Koval
* URL : https://github.com/mrjoes/sockjs-tornado
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : server
Benjamin Drung debian.org> writes:
> devscript had only Perl and Shell scripts initially, but then gained
> Python scripts. I don't see any reason to not accept ruby script. ruby
> would pull in another ~ 13 MB of storage, but devscripts targets
> developer machines.
I absolutely do not want to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ximin Luo
* Package name: flashproxy
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : David Fifield
* URL : http://crypto.stanford.edu/flashproxy/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python, JavaScript, Go, Shell
Description : ephe
[Norbert Preining]
> On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > texlive-lang-european? It doesn't look like it to me (no Breaks or
> > Conflicts), but I haven't actually tried it.
>
> conflicts there are, texlive-base conflicts with all the old packages.
I misspoke. There is a Conflicts in
[Thorsten Glaser]
> I absolutely do not want to see anything related to ruby on my
> systems.
Why? Is this just an emotional reaction, or is it the 13 MB of
dependencies, or something else?
I wonder if anyone feels the same way about, say, libraries written in
FORTRAN, or binaries linked agains
clone 709758 -1
reassign -1 src:texlive-lang
retitle -1 Transitional packages for going-away texlive-lang-*
thanks
I'm cloning the original bug report to make a new report for this
issue as described by Lucas:
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Bug#709758: Replacing a binary package by another
one(was:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:55:46PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Norbert Preining]
> > On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > > texlive-lang-european? It doesn't look like it to me (no Breaks or
> > > Conflicts), but I haven't actually tried it.
> > conflicts there are, texlive-base co
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 01:02:35PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Thorsten Glaser]
> > I absolutely do not want to see anything related to ruby on my
> > systems.
> Why? Is this just an emotional reaction, or is it the 13 MB of
> dependencies, or something else?
> I wonder if anyone feels the
On 2013-09-04, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Unless apt has gotten smarter recently (which is not out of the question),
> no. It's a common misconception that apt will care about Provides/Replaces
> for selecting new packages on dist-upgrade, but while it seems like a nice
> idea, TTBOMK it's never bee
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 01:16:12PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Benjamin Drung debian.org> writes:
> > devscript had only Perl and Shell scripts initially, but then gained
> > Python scripts. I don't see any reason to not accept ruby script. ruby
> > would pull in another ~ 13 MB of storage, bu
Hi,
I am an active porter for the alpha architecture in that I run two
buildd servers and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the
jessie release:
For alpha, I
- test some packages on this architecture
- maintain buildds
I am not a DD/DM
Bill MacAllister
--
Bill MacAllister
In
Peter Samuelson dixit:
>> I absolutely do not want to see anything related to ruby on my
>> systems.
>
>Why? Is this just an emotional reaction, or is it the 13 MB of
>dependencies, or something else?
Something else, mostly technical, the rest personal.
>I wonder if anyone feels the same way ab
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jérémy Lal"
* Package name: node-normalize-package-data
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Meryn Stol
* URL : https://github.com/meryn/normalize-package-data
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Desc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jérémy Lal"
* Package name: node-github-url-from-git
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : TJ Holowaychuk
* URL : https://github.com/visionmedia/node-github-url-from-git
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
De
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For SPARC64, I
- test a lot of the packages for KDE4 Desktop
- testing and currently preparing patches for Iceweasel
- test Vanilla build of the Linux kern
severity 721838 whishlist
tags 721838 pending
thanks
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot
* Package name: php-patchwork-utf8
Version : 1.1.11
Upstream Author : Nicolas Grekas
* URL : https://github.com/nicolas-grekas/Patchwork-UTF8
* License : Apache-2.0 or GPL-2
Programming Lang: PHP
Descrip
31 matches
Mail list logo
