On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 23:50 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> One snag I ran into concerning the abstraction layer concerned customizing
> the
> "split file" configuration via conf.d/ files. Upon upgrades dpkg recongizes
> the changes in configuration files and prompts the user; choosing not to
> r
On 12/06/13 21:35, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2013-06-12 08:08:17 +0200 (+0200), Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 12/06/13 00:02, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>>> That basically just makes the case for relying on (E)SMTP only for
>>> transporting messages, but leveraging OpenPGP or S/MIME to provide
>>> authent
On Sb, 08 iun 13, 14:11:33, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> If there are no objections within a few days I would like to make some
> major changes to that page as follows:
>
> * the only options left under debate are:
> - exim (status quo)
> - postfix
> - dma
> - no MTA at all
> - (did I mis
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:17:11 +0100, Ian Campbell
wrote:
>I've just tried this on Wheezy and stuff written in
>in /etc/exim4/conf.d/acl/00-test.dpkg-dist didn't get included:
>$ sudo update-exim4.conf --verbose
>using split configuration scheme from /etc/exim4/conf.d
>inter
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:41:27PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> DFSG #4: Our priorities are our users and free software
>
> A court prosecuting/persecuting one of our users is not in scope
I'm now struggling to understand which side of the argument you are arguing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 06:41:16, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:17:11 +0100, Ian Campbell
>
> wrote:
> >I've just tried this on Wheezy and stuff written in
> >
> >in /etc/exim4/conf.d/acl/00-test.dpkg-dist didn't get included:
> >$ sudo update-exim4.conf --verbose
> >
On 13/06/13 12:59, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:41:27PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> DFSG #4: Our priorities are our users and free software
>>
>> A court prosecuting/persecuting one of our users is not in scope
> I'm now struggling to understand which side of the argument
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:25:34 -0400, Chris Knadle
wrote:
>On Thursday, June 13, 2013 06:41:16, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:17:11 +0100, Ian Campbell
>>
>> wrote:
>> >I've just tried this on Wheezy and stuff written in
>> >
>> >in /etc/exim4/conf.d/acl/00-test.dpkg-dist didn't get
Am 13.06.2013 04:46, schrieb Shawn:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>>
>> == binutils ==
>>
>> binutils 2.23.2 will be uploaded to unstable after GCC 4.8 as the
>> default on x86 reaches testing. Later updates will introduce binutils
>> trunk leading to 2.24, later this
Am 07.05.2013 15:25, schrieb Matthias Klose:
> The decision when to make GCC 4.8 the default for other architectures is
> left to the Debian port maintainers.
[...]
> Information on porting to GCC 4.8 from previous versions of GCC can be
> found in the porting guide http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/port
Hi,
On 13/06/13 13:51, Matthias Klose wrote:
> GCC 4.8 is now the default on all x86 architectures, and on all ARM
> architectures (the latter confirmed by the Debian ARM porters). I did not get
> any feedback from other port maintainers, so unless this does change and port
> maintainers get invo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pablo Oliveira
* Package name: r-cran-lhs
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Rob Carnell
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lhs/
* License : GPL (>= 2)
Programming Lang: C++, R
Description : GNU R pac
Excerpts from Chow Loong Jin's message of 2013-06-12 11:06:54 -0700:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:44:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 04:40:22PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> >
> > > Bitrot doesn't happen immediately, and even when it does happen, it will
> > > take t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pablo Oliveira
* Package name: r-cran-rjsonio
Version : 1.0-3
Upstream Author : Duncan Temple Lang
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RJSONIO/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, R
Description : G
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-pbr
Version : 0.5.16
Upstream Author : openstack-...@lists.openstack.org
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pbr/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Am Donnerstag, den 13.06.2013, 15:46 +0100 schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
> Hi,
>
> On 13/06/13 13:51, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > GCC 4.8 is now the default on all x86 architectures, and on all ARM
> > architectures (the latter confirmed by the Debian ARM porters). I did not
> > get
> > any feedback
Matthias Klose dixit:
>The Java and D frontends now default to 4.8 on all architectures, the Go
>frontend stays at 4.7 until 4.8 get the complete Go 1.1 support.
I’d like to have gcj at 4.6 in gcc-defaults for m68k please,
until the 4.8 one stops FTBFSing.
From me nothing against switching C/C++
Hi,
On 13/06/13 20:47, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> From me nothing against switching C/C++ to 4.8 for m68k at
> this point, but I’d like to hear at least Wouter’s opinion
> on that, and possibly Mikael [...]
Before that can be changed, I think the gcc-defaults package expects
package version (>= 4.8
Steven Chamberlain dixit:
>Before that can be changed, I think the gcc-defaults package expects
>package version (>= 4.8.1-2) whereas m68k still has only the 4.8.0-7 you
>uploaded.
Right. That’s because gcj FTBFSes.
>You will also first need newer binutils (>= 2.23.52) which is still in
>the bui
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 08:16:02, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:25:34 -0400, Chris Knadle
>
> wrote:
> >On Thursday, June 13, 2013 06:41:16, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:17:11 +0100, Ian Campbell
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> >I've just tried this on Wheezy and stuff wr
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 486 (new: 4)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 154 (new: 13)
Total number of packages reques
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:42:15 -0400, Chris Knadle
wrote:
>So right now I think that I probably just didn't know that this had been
>fixed, because I haven't been using the "split file" configuration for along
>time. I clearly remember having _upgrade_ problems in 2003 with Exim on
>Debian Testi
22 matches
Mail list logo
