Le lundi 25 février 2013 à 11:43 -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> 4. We overrule the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to add a
>dependency from gnome to network-manager-gnome; this dependency
>should be removed. If in the opinion of the NM maintainer (and
>before the release of wh
reassign 701585 general
thanks
Le mardi 26 février 2013 à 08:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> No, but the BTS is (to some extent), and there are various tools that
> suggest the package "general" if you don't know what the exact buggy
> program is. When doing that, the package ends up on debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 701585 general
Bug #701585 [gnome-settings-daemon] general: Can't select other languages
Bug reassigned from package 'gnome-settings-daemon' to 'general'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #701585 to the same values
previou
Quoting Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org):
> That’s what gnome-control-center does. This is not helpful for the user
> who wants to select another language, though.
>
> The bug is that we do not install locales-all by default, nor do we
> default to generate all (at least all UTF-8) locales.
At
reassign 701585 locales
# or close
thanks
On Dienstag, 26. Februar 2013, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> reassign 701585 general
> thanks
>
> Le mardi 26 février 2013 à 08:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > No, but the BTS is (to some extent), and there are various tools that
> > suggest the packa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 701585 locales
Bug #701585 [general] general: Can't select other languages
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'locales'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #701585 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 25 février 2013 à 11:43 -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> > 4. We overrule the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to add a
> >dependency from gnome to network-manager-gnome; this dependency
> >should be removed. If in the opinion of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Masayuki Hatta
* Package name: haskell-wl-pprint-text
Version : 1.1.0.0
Upstream Author : Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
* URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/package/wl-pprint-text-1.1.0.0
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Haskel
* Paul Wise , 2013-01-22, 10:24:
Please add the commands needed for running adequate to this list of
checking tools:
http://wiki.debian.org/HowToPackageForDebian#Check_points_for_any_package
Unlike other tools on that list, adequate requires the package to be
installed before it can be check
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 13:31:37, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le lundi 25 février 2013 à 11:43 -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> > > 4. We overrule the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to add a
> > >
> > >dependency from gnome to network-m
Le Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 07:27:19PM +0100, Christian PERRIER a écrit :
> Quoting Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org):
>
> > That’s what gnome-control-center does. This is not helpful for the user
> > who wants to select another language, though.
> >
> > The bug is that we do not install locales-all
Charles Plessy writes:
> on these systems, getting all the default fonts and input methods would
> also be a big plus. For the moment we are years behind other systems
> such as Mac OS, where at any time it is possible to switch language or
> browse a website in a language that is not the defaul
State of the Debian/Ubuntu arm64 port
=
*** Arm64 lives! ***
Executive summary
-
* There is now a bootable (raring) image to download and run
* Everything has been rebuilt against glibc 2.17 so it works
* A bit more work is needed to make th
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Unlike other tools on that list, adequate requires the package to be
> installed before it can be checked. Then you call it this way:
>
> adequate
>
> Feel free to update the wiki page; I won't do it myself.
Will add it once adequate reaches t
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Amen to this. I care a lot about having fairly complete Unicode coverage
> in my display fonts, and I've often had to trawl through aptitude to try
> to guess at which font packages I need to install just to, for example,
> see the front page
15 matches
Mail list logo