Re: Bug#697433: Is the Package-List field necessary for uploads ?

2013-01-12 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:29:13 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote: > here is a new version trying to addres Simon's and Guillem's comments. > > By the way, isn't "Package-Type: udeb" completely redundant with "Section: > debian-installer" ? Different purposes. udeb is a file format, allowed to break ftp

Re: Packages with incomplete .md5sum files

2013-01-12 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:13:46PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Excluding shipped files from .md5sums looks seriously wrong for files > > in /usr and at least questionable in /var/lib. > > What is so "serious" about that? In itself i

Packages with Depends, Recommends and Suggests on fuse-utils (in unstable)

2013-01-12 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi As per dev-ref 7.1.1 about mass-bugfilling I'm writing first to debian-devel. In unstable fuse-utils transitional package was dropped, and this now makes some packages uninstallable. Some Depends, Recommends or Suggests still fuse-utils. Wheezy is not affected as it still contains the fuse-uti

Re: Packages with Depends, Recommends and Suggests on fuse-utils (in unstable)

2013-01-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:39:45 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi > > As per dev-ref 7.1.1 about mass-bugfilling I'm writing first to > debian-devel. > > In unstable fuse-utils transitional package was dropped, and this now > makes some packages uninstallable. Some Depends, Recommends or

Re: Packages with Depends, Recommends and Suggests on fuse-utils (in unstable)

2013-01-12 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Cc'in explicitly Daniel Baumann (maintaner of fuse package) On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:39:45AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > As per dev-ref 7.1.1 about mass-bugfilling I'm writing first to > debian-devel. > > In unstable fuse-utils transitional package was dropped, and this now > makes

Re: Packages with Depends, Recommends and Suggests on fuse-utils (in unstable)

2013-01-12 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Julien On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:15:26PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:39:45 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Hi > > > > As per dev-ref 7.1.1 about mass-bugfilling I'm writing first to > > debian-devel. > > > > In unstable fuse-utils transitional package

Re: [cut-team] Time to merge back ubuntu improvements!

2013-01-12 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 16:05 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > [ dropping -www, setting Mail-Followup-To: cut-team ] > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:06:00PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > On 01/05/2013 01:28 AM, alberto fuentes wrote:

Re: [cut-team] Time to merge back ubuntu improvements!

2013-01-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Svante Signell (2013-01-12 13:59:02) > On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 16:05 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > [ dropping -www, setting Mail-Followup-To: cut-team ] > > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:06:00PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote

Re: Bug#697433: Is the Package-List field necessary for uploads ?

2013-01-12 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 09:07:19 +, Neil Williams wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:29:13 +0900 > Charles Plessy wrote: > > By the way, isn't "Package-Type: udeb" completely redundant with "Section: > > debian-installer" ? > > Different purposes. Right. Where using Section in general should be c

Re: [cut-team] Time to merge back ubuntu improvements!

2013-01-12 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Le samedi 12 janvier 2013 15:21:24, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > I recommend instead of redefining logic of unstable, branch off new > suites with new logic. > > ...and then back to that issue of "maintainers should concentrate on the > release" again: I do sincerely worry that additional suite

Re: [cut-team] Time to merge back ubuntu improvements!

2013-01-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/12/2013 08:59 PM, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 16:05 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> Doesn't this diminish significantly the advantages of CUT? Back in the >> days of the CUT discussion, one of the main "issues" associated to >> testing is that it stops rolling during fre

Re: [cut-team] Time to merge back ubuntu improvements!

2013-01-12 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 15:50 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > Le samedi 12 janvier 2013 15:21:24, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > > I recommend instead of redefining logic of unstable, branch off new > > suites with new logic. > > > > ...and then back to that issue of "maintainers should concen

Re: [cut-team] Time to merge back ubuntu improvements!

2013-01-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 12.01.2013 16:11, Svante Signell wrote: Or to say it differently: experimental being really for new stuff unstable unfrozen always: - stable+1 if no freeze - stable+2 if in freeze - and stable+1=unstable at the freeze time. This is similar to what used to happen before the testing suite exis

Re: [cut-team] Time to merge back ubuntu improvements!

2013-01-12 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 17:14 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 12.01.2013 16:11, Svante Signell wrote: > > Or to say it differently: > > experimental being really for new stuff > > unstable unfrozen always: > > - stable+1 if no freeze > > - stable+2 if in freeze > > - and stable+1=unstable at the f

Bug#698013: ITP: ITP:rasterbator-ng -- Create rasterized versions of images

2013-01-12 Thread Steven Anderson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: ITP:rasterbator-ng Version: 0.1 Upstream Author: [Tobias Jakobs http://code.google.com/p/rasterbator-ng/] License: [GPL] Description: [Create

Bug#698015: ITP: python-pbkdf2 -- Python RSA PKCS#5 v2.0 module

2013-01-12 Thread Alessio Treglia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alessio Treglia * Package name: python-pbkdf2 Version : 1.3 Upstream Author : Dwayne C. Litzenberger * URL : https://www.dlitz.net/software/python-pbkdf2/ * License : Expat Programming Lang: Python Description :

Bug#698020: ITP: python-xdo -- python library for simulating X11 keyboard/mouse input (libxdo bindings)

2013-01-12 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Daniel Kahn Gillmor * Package name: python-xdo Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Daniel Kahn Gillmor * URL : git://lair.fifthhorseman.net/~dkg/python-xdo * License : BSD Programming Lang: C, Python Description : py

Re: Bug#697433: Is the Package-List field necessary for uploads ?

2013-01-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy writes: > here is a new version trying to addres Simon's and Guillem's comments. Seconded. In response to the other follow-up, I don't think this is the right place (or bug) to discuss udeb package behavior or what portions of Policy they comply with. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debi

Re: Bug#697433: Is the Package-List field necessary for uploads ?

2013-01-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Jonathan Nieder writes: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> In response to the other follow-up, I don't think this is the right >> place (or bug) to discuss udeb package behavior or what portions of >> Policy they comply with. > Surely it is relevant to people reading policy that it does not comply > with

Re: Bug#697433: Is the Package-List field necessary for uploads ?

2013-01-12 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Russ Allbery wrote: > In response to the other follow-up, I don't think this is the right place > (or bug) to discuss udeb package behavior or what portions of Policy they > comply with. Surely it is relevant to people reading policy that it does not comply with them all (or in other words that t

Re: Bug#697433: Is the Package-List field necessary for uploads ?

2013-01-12 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 15:29:13 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > here is a new version trying to addres Simon's and Guillem's comments. > @@ -2671,6 +2671,7 @@ Package: libc6 > Description > (mandatory) > Homepage > Built-Using > +id="f-Package-Type">P

Bug#698030: debian-policy: document micro binary packages (udebs).

2013-01-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: debian-policy Severity: wishlist Le Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:27:37PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : > > We already talk about udeb in various places (shlibs, for instance). This > isn't a new problem. Hi Russ and everybody, actually the only section of the Policy that currently contains