On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:03:25 +0800
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/05/2013 09:50 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> >
> > Please check out these links if you want to make this happen. Probably
> > an initial target of supporting oldstable for the same length of time
> > as stable (instead of just a year) is a
Package: wnpp
Owner: tak...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gitignore-boilerplates
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Simon Whitaker
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/simonwhitaker/gitignore-boilerplates
* License : public domain
Description : shell
Hi Neil,
On Sa 05 Jan 2013 09:58:48 CET Neil Williams wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:03:25 +0800
Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 01/05/2013 09:50 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> Please check out these links if you want to make this happen. Probably
> an initial target of supporting oldstable for the same l
Hi Thomas,
On Sa 05 Jan 2013 07:03:25 CET Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 01/05/2013 09:50 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
Please check out these links if you want to make this happen. Probably
an initial target of supporting oldstable for the same length of time
as stable (instead of just a year) is a good fi
Hi pabs,
On Sa 05 Jan 2013 02:50:47 CET Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Slightly different approach: However, for serious server deployments we in
Debian might want to think about supporting older releases a little longer
than atm.
A scheme like
veryol
On 01/06/2013 02:02 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>> I agree. It would be nice if it was at least possible to upload security
>> updates
>> right now to old-stable, even if that wasn't officially supported. At
>> least, this
>> would be a nice way to go forward (eg: based on "best effort",
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Bechtold
* Package name: ostree
Version : 2012.13
Upstream Author : Colin Walters
* URL : https://live.gnome.org/OSTree/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Linux-based operating system dev
Thomas Bechtold, le Sat 05 Jan 2013 20:27:32 +0100, a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Thomas Bechtold
>
> * Package name: ostree
> Version : 2012.13
> Upstream Author : Colin Walters
> * URL : https://live.gnome.org/OSTree/
> * License : G
On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 02:44:42 +0800
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/06/2013 02:02 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> >> I agree. It would be nice if it was at least possible to upload security
> >> updates
> >> right now to old-stable, even if that wasn't officially supported. At
> >> leas
On Sat 05 Jan 2013 16:43:10 Samuel Thibault escribió:
> Thomas Bechtold, le Sat 05 Jan 2013 20:27:32 +0100, a écrit :
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Thomas Bechtold
> >
> > * Package name: ostree
> >
> > Version : 2012.13
> > Upstream Author : Colin Walters
>
Dear FTP team and everybody,
we are documenting in the Policy the Package-List field of the Debian source
control files.
Multiline field listing all the packages that can be built from
the source package. The first line of the field value is empty.
Each one of the next lines describe one b
Charles Plessy (06/01/2013):
> I do not know if this field should be marked mandatory, recommended
> or optional. Is this field strictly necessary for uploads ?
I'm not sure how we could be making this field mandatory all of a
sudden. (Think uploads to {o,s}-p-u, for a start.)
Mraw,
KiBi.
sig
Hi,
I thought about this package at one point but I did not since its real
upstream Japanese government agency had very restrictive license.
http://www.tokuteicorpus.jp/ (Japanese pages)
http://www.tokuteicorpus.jp/dist/ Version 1.3.12
http://www.tokuteicorpus.jp/dist/modules/system/m
Neil,
I agree on all what you said (eg: difficulties in doing such a maintenance,
the fact we don't have unlimited manpower, etc.), but I'm still convince it
would be worth a try.
On 01/06/2013 04:39 AM, Neil Williams wrote:
> It's not about prohibiting updates, it's that most maintainers don't
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 01:54:34PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> Neil,
>
> I agree on all what you said (eg: difficulties in doing such a maintenance,
> the fact we don't have unlimited manpower, etc.), but I'm still convince it
> would be worth a try.
>
> On 01/06/2013 04:39 AM, Neil William
15 matches
Mail list logo
