On Tue, December 25, 2012 23:53, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Thankfully, Debian provides a perfectly reasonable version numbering
> system (as, for that matter, does Apple), so all one has to do is remember
> to use it with the uninitiated. For example, our internal metrics on
> adoption and migration t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Salvatore Bonaccorso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: pamtester
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Moriyoshi Koizumi
* URL : http://pamtester.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package name: birdfont
Version: 0.8.0
Upstream Author: 2012 Johan Mattsson
URL: http://birdfont.org/
License: GPL-3
Do remember we have found this guy out to be a troll, so he was probably not on
the whole trying to make much in the way of constructive comment.
Although I think it is wise to include version numbers with version names often
enough to create a clear understanding of the different versions.
Jam
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)"
* Package name: lasem
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Emmanuel Pacaud
* URL : https://live.gnome.org/Lasem ;
http://blogs.gnome.org/emmanuel/category/lasem/
* License : LGPL(v2
Fedora had the same bug and it has been fixed with the recent commits.
see if this lengthy report helps.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885133
On 12/30/2012 04:26 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Would it be an idea to publish the list of version numbers and associated
> code names a few releases ahead, say the upcoming three releases? Of
> course the prerogative of deciding on the names will remain with the
> release team, it would only be p
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 01:23:56AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Please +1 to this if you agree.
Please don't. -devel is not a popularity contest.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 12/31/2012 04:16 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Please don't. -devel is not a popularity contest.
I'm stunted by the complexity of your argumentation.
It for sure helps in the debate.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
9 matches
Mail list logo