Hi,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:48:04AM +, peter green wrote:
> >Since yesterday, my tools can now finally turn the whole dependency
> >graph
> Does this "whole dependency graph" include the implicit
> build-dependency every package has on build-essential?
For source packages for native compil
On 23.11.2012 08:47, Russell Coker wrote:
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:26:55 +1100
Really?
Source: bonnie++
Binary: bonnie++
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.97
Distribution: wheezy
[...]
bonnie++ (1.97) wheezy; urgency=medium
I'm afraid I've removed that upload from testin
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> On 23.11.2012 08:47, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Format: 1.8
> > Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:26:55 +1100
>
> Really?
That was a mistake.
> I'm afraid I've removed that upload from testing-proposed-uploads.
> Testing and unstable (and stable!) all have
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: drumkv1
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Rui Nuno Capela
* URL : http://drumkv1.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : old-school drum-kit sampler
drumkv1 is
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:02:18AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
> > * Package name: linux-minidisc
>
> Thats a strange name considering it builds and runs on MacOS, Windows,
> Linux, FreeBSD and Haiku.
Yes, the name is indeed s
Jon Dowland writes ("Re: debian mate"):
> On 22 Nov 2012, at 15:57, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > So if you don't like that decision it should be escalated to the
> > Technical Committee.
>
> I'm surprised that *anyone* can refer issues to tech ctte.
Of course they can. Users, upstreams, downstreams,
Didier Raboud dijo [Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:21:19PM +0100]:
> > > > I am asking why, when I had a reason to do so, was not able to do a
> > > > source-only upload.
> > > > Is this a feature of dak, or a policy enforcement?
> > >
> > > Both.
> >
> > I'd argue that it's a bug in both.
> >
> > BTW,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:30:02AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I would probably add a "rebuild when entering testing" where this to
> be a perfect world, to ensure continued buildability.
The proper solution to this is regular test rebuilds of testing or
unstable (to make sure packages are still b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: avw.lv2
Version : 0.0.8
Upstream Author : Aurélien Leblond
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/avwlv2/
* License : GPL, ISC
Programming Lang: C++
Description : collection of V
Am 22.11.2012 16:57, schrieb Ian Jackson:
Michael Schmitt writes ("Re: debian mate"):
Am 21.11.2012 10:30, schrieb Neil Williams:
As part of the Debian release team it is Adam's call to make. He's
declared his decision which is fully in line with the freeze policy and
that's that. There is no p
Hi!
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> Also, if I understand correctly, testing is not self-contained wrt
> building, so you can either test that a package from sid rebuilds in
> sid (not very useful for release QA) or that a package from testing
> rebuilds in sid (doesn't actually prove anything usefu
On 11/24/2012 12:30 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I would join this camp as well. Without the working knowledge of being
> a DSA or buildd-admin, I cannot assure how much would this increase
> our workload, but it would probably just mean rebuilding for the most
> popular architectures (that is, AMD64 o
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:12:55PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Because nobody knows anymore how to maintain libraries as complex as
> bonobo, for example. And I’m pretty sure the MATE developers don’t have
> the expertise.
Yet.
Can you please accept that there are some people who dislike gno
13 matches
Mail list logo
