Hi,
According to the huge thread starting at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00469.html, it seems that:
- there's consensus that a lightweight process for orphaning unmaintained
packages is a good idea (if you are not convinced yet, I urge you to read
Russ' post at https://lis
Scott Kitterman (27/10/2012):
> If the maintainer never responds, then (it turns out) there was no
> need for the delay. So there are cases where delay is pointless,
> the problem is that you can't tell in advance if you're in one of
> those cases or not.
Thankfully, nothing stops anyone from NM
Hi!
Libraries with `-dbg` package are a pain to deal with when debugging
some problem. The solution to ask each user to rebuild the library
without stripping debug symbols[1] seem suboptimal. Asking each
maintainer to ship a `-dbg` package may be a solution[2] but couldn't we
generate those packag
Ricardo Obando, le Fri 26 Oct 2012 21:29:37 -0300, a écrit :
> When will there be in debian installer for Debian and wubi as Ubuntu?
When somebody implements it.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:25:31PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Libraries with `-dbg` package are a pain to deal with when debugging
> some problem.
You probably mean "without".
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
❦ 27 octobre 2012 12:42 CEST, Andrey Rahmatullin :
>> Libraries with `-dbg` package are a pain to deal with when debugging
>> some problem.
> You probably mean "without".
Yes.
--
printk(KERN_WARNING "Multi-volume CD somehow got mounted.\n");
2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/fs/isofs/inode.c
pg
Do not kick me, but in Solaris, there are :
1) special ELF section .SUNW_ldynsym extending .dynsym [1]
2) .SUNW_ctf with CTF data [2]
3) Function args are saved in stack for amd64
But from my point all it exists because Solaris lacks robust
package manager :-)
[1] https://blogs.oracle.com/ali/en
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:36:15AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> - there's some disagreement [...]
More disagreement than I expected.
> here is a new version of the last step of
> the proposed procedure:
> For completeness, here is the full proposal. I've also addressed a few
> cosmetic comment
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:27:59 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:25:47PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Another way to look at it is the number of maintainers, as recorded in
>> the Packages and Sources files. I've done a bit of scripting and came
>> with these numbers:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Arno Töll"
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arno Töll
thanks
* Package name: dput-ng
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Arno Töll , Paul Tagliamonte
* URL : http://people.debian.org/~paultag/dput-ng
* License :
On 27.10.2012 12:25, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Libraries with `-dbg` package are a pain to deal with when debugging
> some problem. The solution to ask each user to rebuild the library
> without stripping debug symbols[1] seem suboptimal. Asking each
> maintainer to ship a `-dbg` package may
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> So maybe we could simply allow
> anyone, including non-DDs, to submit O-bugs for packages which seem abandoned
> by the maintainer, and to submit ITA-bugs for packages he/she wishes to
> salvage. Sounds revolutionary, but in reality this is m
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:19:25 Bart Martens wrote:
> So maybe we could simply allow anyone, including non-DDs, to
> submit O-bugs for packages which seem abandoned by the maintainer, and to
> submit ITA-bugs for packages he/she wishes to salvage.
Yes please. This is common sense and most obvious thi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Per Andersson
* Package name: python-django-schedule
Version : 0.5b~ds1
Upstream Author : Zylinsky, Górny, Hauber
* URL : http://github.com/boskee/django-schedule
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Le Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:19:25PM +, Bart Martens a écrit :
>
> Thanks for your effort, Lucas. I don't object against this new text.
Many thanks and thumbs up to Lucas as well.
> maybe we could simply allow anyone, including non-DDs, to submit O-bugs for
> packages which seem abandoned by
I don't think we need GRs to decide development procedures like this.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> When somebody implements it.
Someone already did:
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/tools/win32-loader/unstable/win32-loader.txt
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.or
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> maybe we could simply allow anyone, including non-DDs, to submit O-bugs for
>> packages which seem abandoned by the maintainer, and to submit ITA-bugs for
>> packages he/she wishes to salvage.
>
> I think that this misses one of the reasons
18 matches
Mail list logo
