Le mardi, 23 octobre 2012 19.19:37, Sune Vuorela a écrit :
> 1) report a bug 'should this package be orphaned?' against the package
> with a more or less defalut templated text and a serious severity
Make it 'affects qa.debian.org', with an eventual usertag, eventually X-
Debbugs-CC debian-qa@ldo,
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:40:39PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> > 4. When/if consensus has been reached, the package can be orphaned by
>> >retitling and reassigning the ITO bug accordingly.
>
>> I fear a bit the situation "nobody care enough to comment", being
Andreas Tille wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 05:32:25PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I don't object to ACKs, but the requirement to get a certain ACK/NACK
>ratio. I see risk of this devolving into a popularity contest.
>>
>> I think it should either be unanimous or there is a dispute t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: chrysn
* Package name: libopencm3
Version : not released yet
Upstream Author : Uwe Hermann , Piotr Esden-Tempski
and others
* URL : http://libopencm3.org/
* License : LGPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : fi
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:59:09PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 11:55 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:40:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >>>I fear a bit the situation "nobody care enough to comment", being
> >>>interpreted as lack of consensus. But I do thi
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:59:09PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 11:55 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:40:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >>>I fear a bit the situation "nobody care enough to comment", being
> >>>interpreted as lack of consensus. But I do thi
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:58:16PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > I disagree on this point. If you can't get anyone to ack that you should go
> > ahead with the orphaning, then the system is not working as designed and
> > consensus has not been achieved. It's then incumbent on the person looking
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:58:16PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:40:39PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >> > 4. When/if consensus has been reached, the package can be orphaned by
> >> >retitling and reassigning the ITO bug accordingly
On 10/25/2012 12:11 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
And I don't think this is a realistic scenario. Why can't you find N
other DDs who agree with you that the package should be taken over?
Hum ... and what makes you think that it will always be easy
to find people to ACK? Making sure that a package i
On 10/25/2012 12:15 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, it makes the process based on *consensus*, which is a minimum
requirement.
How many people should send ACKs in this system?
- If it's a lot of people, then it's hard to hunt for so many.
- If it's not a lot of people, then it hardly can be cal
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 14:59:09 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> So, what will you do if:
> - previous maintainer goes MIA
> - Somebody wants to hija^W salvage the package and starts the procedure
> - Nobody votes for this to happen...
They should use the already existing MIA process instead...
rega
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:57:12AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I remember when I started a thread about 6 months ago,
> willing to take over maintainership of a clearly unmaintained
> package (since then, all other packages of this maintainer
> have been orphaned...). It (unwillingly) created a
Bug Squashing Party in Dublin
=
http://wiki.debian.org/BSP/2012/11/ie/Dublin
Come and help get Wheezy released, a second time!
After the success of the first Irish Debian BSP, we're holding a
second one in November. We will gather to collectively fix bugs and
help each
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:48:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Silence is not assent. That thread blew up because you proposed a *broken*
No, silence is an indication that you don't deserve any decision-making
power.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Le Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:46:08PM +, Clint Adams a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:48:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Silence is not assent. That thread blew up because you proposed a *broken*
>
> No, silence is an indication that you don't deserve any decision-making
> power.
Hi
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:38:19AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:46:08PM +, Clint Adams a écrit :
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:48:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Silence is not assent. That thread blew up because you proposed a
> > > *broken*
> > No, sil
16 matches
Mail list logo
