On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:15:45PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> If you have 5000 erase cycles, it will run for 13 years if you overwrite
> it once per day. Do you really expect this device to work until this?
Why not, my computer upgrade cycles are about 6-8 years and the
computer won't be idli
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luca Bruno
* Package name: rust
Version : 0.3.4
Upstream Author : Graydon Hoare et al.
* URL : http://http://www.rust-lang.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C/C++, Rust
Description : a safe, concurrent, prac
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guo Yixuan
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gcc-4.7-doc
Version : 4.7.2-1
Upstream Author : Free Software Foundation
* URL : http://gcc.gnu.org
* License : GFDL with
Relax :-)
It is a hardware problem.
Just keep doing your regular job till SDD become more robust.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CALL-Q8xFUS22ff1by
I've been attempting to use multi-arch for cross-building packages for
raspbian (a debian derivative I am working on for armv6 hardfloat) and
run into a few things which I thought i'd share and/or ask about.
Build-depends installation:
apt-get build-dep is fine if you are building an unmodifie
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:34:18PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> Build-depends installation:
> apt-get build-dep is fine if you are building an unmodified package
> from a repo but it's of no use if you have modified the
> build-dependencies to make them satisfiable.
>
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps doesn't
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:52:23PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 06:48:22PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> > Actual proposal follows:
>
> The proposal adds a new procedure that overlaps/bypasses existing procedures.
>
> We have discussed that before in this thread :
> http://lis
Hi,
On 30.09.2012 18:33, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> As a general principle, I'm with Bart here. I don't think we will
> benefit from a new, relatively complex, procedure that overlaps with
> other existing mechanisms.
As for me, I am fine with *any* proposal which works out in practice.
Bei it
gregor herrmann writes:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:29:09 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> I've solved that in the
>> preinst script by 'rm -rf /usr/include/libfm' and I thought yet that was
>> a right step since upgrade 1.0.1 -> 1.0.2 went smooth.
>> >>>Somehow that sounds like a real
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 06:33:58PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> As a general principle, I'm with Bart here. I don't think we will
> benefit from a new, relatively complex, procedure that overlaps with
> other existing mechanisms.
>
> Socially, we need to acknowledge the fact that the curren
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dominique Dumont
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl
Version : 2.026
Upstream Author : Dominique Dumont
* URL : FIXME
* License : LGPL-2.1+
]] Nikolaus Rath
> How do I check if a directory belongs to a package?
dpkg -S ?
> What should package do if it wants to install a file in a directory
> owned by another package?
The maintainers should talk with each other and come to some sort of
agreement. What they decide on should be docu
Tollef Fog Heen writes:
> ]] Nikolaus Rath
>
>> How do I check if a directory belongs to a package?
>
> dpkg -S ?
I guess you shouldn't have used "belongs" but "owns" here. For example,
for /usr/share/dict dpkg -S lists wamerican, base-files and
dictionaries-common. How do I find out which of th
Nikolaus Rath writes:
> Tollef Fog Heen writes:
>> ]] Nikolaus Rath
>>> How do I check if a directory belongs to a package?
>> dpkg -S ?
> I guess you shouldn't have used "belongs" but "owns" here. For example,
> for /usr/share/dict dpkg -S lists wamerican, base-files and
> dictionaries-commo
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 06:10:16PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > I don't know what to make of the "seconds" suggestion by Bart, though. I
> > understand the rationale, but is not clear to me how to raise the
> > interest by other DDs in reviewing the "intent to orphan" bugs filed by
> > 3rd partie
+++ peter green [2012-09-30 15:34 +0100]:
> I've been attempting to use multi-arch for cross-building packages
> for raspbian (a debian derivative I am working on for armv6
> hardfloat) and run into a few things which I thought i'd share
> and/or ask about.
I've been doing a fair amount of this to
On 30/09/2012 18:49, Frank Bauer wrote:
> Why not, my computer upgrade cycles are about 6-8 years and the
> computer won't be idling all the time - especially considering modern
> desktop environments running whole database engines to store
> config/meta data.
>
> Is writing of 160GB/day realistic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Hans-Christoph Steiner"
* Package name: pd-chaos
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Ben Bogart and Michael McGonagle
* URL : http://puredata.info/downloads/chaos
* License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
* Package name: erlang-bitcask
Version : 1.1.6
Upstream Author : Basho Technologies
* URL : https://github.com/basho/bitcask
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: erlang
Description : Log-Stru
]] Russ Allbery
> A package that wants to change a directory to a symlink (or vice versa) is
> a very special case, and one that runs afoul of dpkg support for the local
> system administrator moving and symlinking directories (something that can
> be quite useful if one screws up disk partitioni
20 matches
Mail list logo
