On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:45:40PM +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Wookey writes:
> > And navit and marble and foxtrotGPS and gpsdrive and viking and
> > gpxviewer and memphis.
>
> Hey you forgot monav :)
Do you know that there is a page which (hopefully - just tell me if I'm
wrong!) lists
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon McVittie
* Package name: mpdris2
Version : 0.2+git2012.08.14
Upstream Author : Jean-Philippe Braun, Mantas Mikulėnas
* URL : https://github.com/eonpatapon/mpDris2
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
Desc
Christoph Anton Mitterer writes:
> Hey.
>
> Apart from the question whether this RFC is anyhow reasonable...
>
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 08:55 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Category: Best Current Practice
> Can a BCP deprecate stuff which is standardised by RFCs from the
> standards track?
What
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Per Andersson
* Package name: python-django-mezzanine
Version : 1.2.4
Upstream Author : Stephen McDonald
* URL : http://mezzanine.jupo.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python, Javascript
Description : CMS b
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:44 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Also, we should mention somewhere (the install documentation?) that
> non-free should be enabled to install microcode fixes which may be
> critical to maintain the system stability.
Could you elaborate on this please? I have been runnin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Abaakouk
* Package name: python-glanceclient
Version : folsom
Upstream Author : Openstack
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/python-glanceclient
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Abaakouk
* Package name: python-warlock
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Brian Waldon
* URL : http://github.com/bcwaldon/warlock
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: python
Description : Python object mod
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Abaakouk
* Package name: python-cinderclient
Version : folsom
Upstream Author : Openstack
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/python-cinderclient
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:44 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Also, we should mention somewhere (the install documentation?) that
> > non-free should be enabled to install microcode fixes which may be
> > critical to maintain the system stability.
>
This issue was already discussed [1], and I've filed the
respective bug report [2] (to which there was no reply so far,
though), but now I see that there's a few more packages in
Wheezy with a dependency on libhdf5-7. Consider, e. g.:
$ bzcat \
< http.debian.
Charles Plessy, 2012-09-13 01:55+0200:
> I would like to share with you the recently published RFC 6648, which
> deprecates the use of "X-" prefixes in "application protocols"
Perhaps we should consider changing the way we write user-defined
control fields (policy §5.7)? Instead of things like
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 02:55:04 PM Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Charles Plessy, 2012-09-13 01:55+0200:
> > I would like to share with you the recently published RFC 6648, which
> > deprecates the use of "X-" prefixes in "application protocols"
>
> Perhaps we should consider changing the way we
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 14:55:04 +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Charles Plessy, 2012-09-13 01:55+0200:
> > I would like to share with you the recently published RFC 6648, which
> > deprecates the use of "X-" prefixes in "application protocols"
>
> Perhaps we should consider changing the way we write
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:44 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> > Also, we should mention somewhere (the install documentation?) that
>> > non-free should be enabled to install microcode fixes which may be
>> > cri
On Jo, 13 sep 12, 11:29:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
> I think this should be mentioned somewhere *much* more prominent. I
> consider myself pretty tech-savy, but only stumbled upon this just now
> on the this list. Can a non-free package be made essential or
> required? It seems there is really abs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Alex 'AdUser' Z"
* Package name: udpxy
Version : 1.0.23
Upstream Author : Pavel V. Cherenkov
* URL : http://www.udpxy.com
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : udpxy is a UDP-to-HTTP multicast tra
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> > On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:44 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >> > Also, we should mention somewhere (the install documentation?) that
> >> > non-free should be enabl
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 13 sep 12, 11:29:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > I think this should be mentioned somewhere *much* more prominent. I
> > consider myself pretty tech-savy, but only stumbled upon this just now
> > on the this list. Can a non-free package be made essen
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> (replying to -devel and -boot only)
(I am not subscribed to -boot. Please keep -devel on replies, or CC me
directly).
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >> If we do that the same should also happen for
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 13:45 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > I think this should be mentioned somewhere *much* more prominent. I
> > consider myself pretty tech-savy, but only stumbled upon this just now
> > on the this list. Can a non-fre
Hi, all.
I think it's time to announce, that I've been working on a new Debian
port from the last fall.
This is Debian on illumos kernel (formerly OpenSolaris) - http://osdyson.org
It really aims to be *general-purpose* OS, not a server, a destop or
an appliance.
I was motivated because Nexenta
Hello,
I am using debhelper 9.20120115 and would like some advice on bundling
/etc/modprobe.d/package.modprobe and /etc/modules.
1. I am currently using dh_installmodules to install package.modprobe.
However, I noticed that the automated debhelper commands in
postins/postrm don't run upd
Hi,
On 13.09.2012 20:48, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> I think it's time to announce, that I've been working on a new Debian
> port from the last fall.
> This is Debian on illumos kernel (formerly OpenSolaris) - http://osdyson.org
I like that idea (but I'm also involved in other "toy ports"). Do you
have
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 19:19 +, Amit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using debhelper 9.20120115 and would like some advice on bundling
> /etc/modprobe.d/package.modprobe and /etc/modules.
>
> 1. I am currently using dh_installmodules to install package.modprobe.
> However, I noticed that the auto
Am 13.09.2012 22:53, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 19:19 +, Amit wrote:
>> 2. I also need to specify module load order so I am bundling
>> /etc/modules. However, there doesn't seem to be a debhelper script
>> to handle /etc/modules.
>
> Don't ever touch /etc/modules,
Ben Hutchings decadent.org.uk> writes:
[snip]
> > 1. I am currently using dh_installmodules to install package.modprobe.
> > However, I noticed that the automated debhelper commands in
> > postins/postrm don't run update-initramfs. Is updating initramfs not
> > necessary?
>
> That
Michael Biebl michaelbiebl.de> writes:
>
> Am 13.09.2012 22:53, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
[snip]
> > Don't ever touch /etc/modules, that's for the user/administrator. You
> > can load modules from an init script if there is really no better way.
>
> You can use a modules-load.d file [1]. While
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 21:47 +, Amit wrote:
> Ben Hutchings decadent.org.uk> writes:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > 1. I am currently using dh_installmodules to install package.modprobe.
> > > However, I noticed that the automated debhelper commands in
> > > postins/postrm don't run update-initr
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> I think it's time to announce, that I've been working on a new Debian
> port from the last fall.
> This is Debian on illumos kernel (formerly OpenSolaris) - http://osdyson.org
Is your plan to create a Debian derivative or a Debian port to be
i
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 20:59 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Anything that's X dash is most likely non-standard.
Of course,... I referred to that other RFCs may still expect the
"experimental" semantics of "X-"
> It can't AIUI, but this is mostly about future usage and not going back and
> creati
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 457 (new: 4)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 141 (new: 0)
Total number of packages request
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> I think it's time to announce, that I've been working on a new Debian
> port from the last fall.
> This is Debian on illumos kernel (formerly OpenSolaris) - http://osdyson.org
I forgot to mention this site, perhaps their stuff will help you:
32 matches
Mail list logo
