--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/501ce0f2.8030...@digitaloctave.com
Le samedi 04 août 2012 à 00:24 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
> > I don't know about serious surveys, but flash drives are ubiquitous
> > and have large storage. Some (many?) laptops don't have optical drives
> > either. For D-I, I would pick the most common USB flash drive size
> > (perhaps 2.0 GB
Le vendredi 03 août 2012 à 23:28 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
> And in wheezy+1(or 2,...), when XFCE has outgrown CD1, we switch to E17,
> or whatever the tasksel maintainers prefer at that time. Sounds like a
> great plan to base our default desktop on the size of a CD or the mood
> of a single
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/501ce464.9030...@digitaloctave.com
reassign 677582 gcc-4.4-base 4.4.7-1
tag 677582 patch
thanks
On 2012-08-03 07:58, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Does it make any difference if you change the Breaks to Conflicts?
Yes, it does. Therefore assigning the bug back to gcc-4.4
I'm testing a squeeze->wheezy distupgrade of the libgcj-bc packag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 677582 gcc-4.4-base 4.4.7-1
Bug #677582 [general] gcc-4.4-base: upgrade problems since removal of gcj-4.4
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'gcc-4.4-base'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #677582 to the same values
Josselin Mouette (04/08/2012):
> This is for example why we still don’t have tmpfs by default.
Your example is wrong.
On a freshly-installed system:
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=161324k)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 12:18:45PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Josselin Mouette (04/08/2012):
> > This is for example why we still don’t have tmpfs by default.
>
> Your example is wrong.
>
> On a freshly-installed system:
> tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=161324k)
Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> My suggestion is to now switch the default compression for GNOME and KDE
> packages to xz using gnome-pkg-tools (pkg-kde-tools) and then either
> schedule binNMUs (only arch:any packages) or no-changes uploads (for
> arch:all or Multi-Arch). I would help with the latter
Joss wrote:
>Le samedi 04 août 2012 à 00:24 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
>> > I don't know about serious surveys, but flash drives are ubiquitous
>> > and have large storage. Some (many?) laptops don't have optical drives
>> > either. For D-I, I would pick the most common USB flash drive size
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:28:28PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:40:25PM -0600, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> One thing I don't think anyone has discussed yet is how key
>> transitions will work, if a distro-specific key is compromised, is the
>> OS able to update the SB keys?
>
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:03:49 +0200
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> The Debian Installer team is pleased to announce the first beta
> release of the installer for Debian 7.0 "Wheezy".
It always makes the release seem closer when there's a beta of d-i to
play with.
:-)
Thanks for getting this working.
Martin Pitt writes:
> Christoph Berg [2012-08-01 21:12 +0200]:
>> The various postgresql-* packages are mostly plugins (PL/something)
>
> Right, postgresql-X.Y-foo are server-side plugins which are specific
> to a major PostgreSQL server version. They need to be versioned just
> like PostgreSQL it
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 17:15 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
> I tried in a standard VM (Debian package from sid) with a complete
> default netinst i386 install. The installer worked flawlessly but
> GNOME3 had a problem:
>
> "GNOME3 Failed to Load
> Unfortunately GNOME3 failed to start properly
Le samedi 04 août 2012 à 18:28 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> This is expected in the absence of 3D acceleration, which is not yet
> supported in qemu so far as I know. VirtualBox is supposed to support
> it, but a standard installation presumably won't pull in the necessary
> paravirtual driver
Le samedi 04 août 2012 à 15:06 +0100, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
> We don't *yet*. The code is there (as mentioned in the DebConf BoF),
> but I've not yet seen a consensus over exactly what people
> want. Currently, I'm thinking an extra 2GB image would be useful. We
> *do* already have a 4GB image (
Ben Hutchings (04/08/2012):
> On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 17:15 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> [...]
> > I tried in a standard VM (Debian package from sid) with a complete
> > default netinst i386 install. The installer worked flawlessly but
> > GNOME3 had a problem:
> >
> > "GNOME3 Failed to Load
> > U
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 20:16 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 04 août 2012 à 18:28 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> > This is expected in the absence of 3D acceleration, which is not yet
> > supported in qemu so far as I know. VirtualBox is supposed to support
> > it, but a standard insta
Hello,
here's a prospective timeline for d-i wheezy beta 2: 3 weeks for
development and bug fixes, 1 week for dealing with udeb-related unblock
requests, building/testing images and preparing release announcement.
The deadline should be pretty clear, and should let time for doc /
translation upda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/04/2012 07:28 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 17:15 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>> That's going to make testing Wheezy CD images annoying. Anyone else see
>> this problem? I tried logging in under GNOME and GNOME Classic - the
Nod. We do have some weirdness there. The schema is that packages built from
postgresql itself use postgresql-*-x.y (mostly), and all others use
postgresql-x.y-*. Arguably, that's confusing.
I have some plan in the back of my brain that extension modules should ship .so
files for all postgresql
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> So we require 3d acceleration for a default install? I think that is even more
> insane than what recent windows versions require. Can we please have a sane
> default desktop for people with older hardware? Maybe just chosen in d-i,
> dependin
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 23:45 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 08/04/2012 07:28 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 17:15 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> >> That's going to make testing Wheezy CD images annoying. Anyone else see
> >> this problem? I tried logging in under GNOME and GNOM
On 08/05/2012 05:45 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> So we require 3d acceleration for a default install? I think that is
> even more
> insane than what recent windows versions require. Can we please have a
> sane
> default desktop for people with older hardware? Maybe just chosen in d-i,
> depending on
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> The deadline should be pretty clear, and should let time for doc /
> translation updates, especially on the installation guide front.
> Christian, could you perform your l10n coordination magic bits?
I'll send yet another call for updates, but I don't
25 matches
Mail list logo
