Re: Patch Tagging Guidelines: DEP-3 moved to ACCEPTED status

Le lundi 16 janvier 2012 à 18:07 +, Ian Jackson a écrit : > I think the DPL should appoint a dictator who will rule on when > consensus has been achieved on a DEP. Seconded. The DEP process is missing a clear way to make a DEP change state. With a single-person (or small team) responsibility,

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:58:13PM -0800, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > * Package name: duff > * URL : http://duff.sourceforge.net/ A quick speed comparison: real user system max RSS elapsed cmd (s) (s) (s)(KiB) (s)

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

Lars Wirzenius, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 09:12:58 +, a écrit : > real user system max RSS elapsed cmd > (s) (s) (s)(KiB) (s) > 3.2 2.4 5.862784 5.8 hardlink --dry-run files > /dev/null >

Re: Using debian/upstream to document things about Upstream with “umegaya”.

Andreas Tille: > (I might have missunderstood DEP-11 but can not check > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep11 > seems to be hosted on vasks as well, right?) According to archive.org, dep11 has not yet appeared on dep.d.n, but: http://wiki.debian.org/AppStreamDebianProposal https://groups.google.com/

Re: squeeze kernel upgrade fixes r8169 network driver?

On 16/01/12 21:14, Curt wrote: Yes, I verified in the kernel logs (/var/log/kern.log--thanks for that tip) : I was using 2.6.32-39 before; after the upgrade I'm using 2.6.32-39squeeze1. According to the changelog, there has indeed been no other changes between those versions. I'm *sure* I re

Re: squeeze kernel upgrade fixes r8169 network driver?

Sorry, wrong list :( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120117101919.GB4280@pris

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:30:20AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Lars Wirzenius, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 09:12:58 +, a écrit : > > real user system max RSS elapsed cmd > > (s) (s) (s)(KiB) (s) > > 3.2

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

Lars Wirzenius, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 10:45:20 +, a écrit : > > > Personally, I would be wary of using checksums for file comparisons, > > > since comparing files byte-by-byte isn't slow (you only need to > > > do it to files that are identical in size, and you need to read > > > all the files any

Bug#656191: ITP: rtmidi -- C++ library for realtime MIDI input/ouput

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alessio Treglia * Package name: rtmidi Version : 1.0.15 Upstream Author : Gary P. Schiavone * URL : http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~gary/rtmidi/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: C++ Description : C++ library for rea

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

Lars Wirzenius, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 10:45:20 +, a écrit : > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:30:20AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Lars Wirzenius, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 09:12:58 +, a écrit : > > > real user system max RSS elapsed cmd > > > > > > (s) (s)

Re: How mature is Pkg-format 3.0 (git), yet?

On Mon, January 16, 2012 23:26, Paul Wise wrote: >> I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until >> now. > > It is not currently accepted by the Debian archive: > > http://bugs.debian.org/642801 My experience until now is that it's mature in dpkg. It does the job just like

Re: status of DEP5: Machine-readable debian/copyright (was: Patch Tagging Guidelines: DEP-3 moved to ACCEPTED status)

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 01/17/2012 01:44 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:14:26PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> >>> FTR given that I got no reports of problems with DEP-3, that it's already >>> well established, I just changed the state

Re: Patch Tagging Guidelines: DEP-3 moved to ACCEPTED status

On 16/01/12 16:01, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: A CVE field, mandatory if a CVE has been published for this patch and is the major component of this patch, would allow easy tracing of patches back to CVE publications later (for review perhaps, or by other distributions). I wonder whether CVE IDs a

Re: Patch Tagging Guidelines: DEP-3 moved to ACCEPTED status

On 2012-01-17 11:37, Simon McVittie wrote: On 16/01/12 16:01, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: A CVE field, mandatory if a CVE has been published for this patch and is the major component of this patch, would allow easy tracing of patches back to CVE publications later (for review perhaps, or by othe

Re: status of DEP5: Machine-readable debian/copyright (was: Patch Tagging Guidelines: DEP-3 moved to ACCEPTED status)

Le Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:07:54PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Yes one question do I need to document aclocal.m4 copyright patchwork ? Dear Bastien, judging from the packages that are accepted in our archive, the empirical answer is no. Nevertheless, the DEP 5 format and any free-for

link proposal

Hello webmaster, Please add our link at your PR2 or above page only. By using following details: *Title - **Casino Slots* *URL - **http://www.meccabingo.com/Games/Category/casino-slots* ** *Description: Play online casino slots at M

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

Samuel Thibault, 2012-01-17 12:03:41 +0100 : [...] > I'm not sure to understand what you mean exactly. If you have even > just a hundred files of the same size, you will need ten thousand file > comparisons! I'm sure that can be optimised. Read all 100 files in parallel, comparing blocks of s

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

Samuel Thibault, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 12:15:16 +0100, a écrit : > Lars Wirzenius, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 10:45:20 +, a écrit : > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:30:20AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Lars Wirzenius, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 09:12:58 +, a écrit : > > > > real user system max RSS e

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

Roland Mas, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 13:41:23 +0100, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault, 2012-01-17 12:03:41 +0100 : > > [...] > > > I'm not sure to understand what you mean exactly. If you have even > > just a hundred files of the same size, you will need ten thousand file > > comparisons! > > I'm sure th

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:05:10PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Roland Mas, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 13:41:23 +0100, a écrit : > > Samuel Thibault, 2012-01-17 12:03:41 +0100 : > > > > [...] > > > > > I'm not sure to understand what you mean exactly. If you have even > > > just a hundred files of the

Bug#656199: ITP: liboptions-java -- liboptions-java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: liboptions-java Version : 0.20120113 Upstream Author : Dr. Matthias Laux * URL : sended in private via mail, I asked for publishing at some downloadable place * License : Apache License Ver

Bug#656203: ITP: libqsi -- Quantum Scientific Imaging Library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jasem Mutlaq * Package name: libqsi Version : 6.0.3 Upstream Author : QSI * URL : http://www.qsimaing.com * License : BSD Programming Lang: C++ Description : Quantum Scientific Imaging Library -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

Samuel Thibault, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 14:02:45 +0100, a écrit : > On my PhD work directory, with various stuff in it (500MiB, 18000 files, > big but also small files (svn/git checkouts etc)), everything being in > cache already (no disk I/O): > > hardlink -t --dry-run . > /dev/null 1,06s user

Bug#656206: ITP: gst-chromaprint -- A GStreamer plugin for chromaprint

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christoph Reiter * Package name: gst-chromaprint Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Lukáš Lalinský * URL : https://github.com/lalinsky/gst-chromaprint * License : LGPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : A GStreame

Bug#656211: ITP: indi-qsi -- INDI QSI Driver

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jasem Mutlaq * Package name: indi-qsi Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Sami Lehti , Jasem Mutlaq * URL : http://www.indilib.org * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : INDI QSI Driver INDI driver f

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

> > Ah, right. So you'll start writing yet another tool? ;) > > I've implemented pretty much that (http://liw.fi/dupfiles), but my > duplicate file finder is not so much better than existing ones in > Debian that I would inflict it on Debian. But the algorithm works > nicely, and works even for peo

Re: Bug#656211: ITP: indi-qsi -- INDI QSI Driver

On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:43:51 +0300 Jasem Mutlaq wrote: > * Package name: indi-qsi > Version : 0.4 > Upstream Author : Sami Lehti , Jasem Mutlaq > > * URL : http://www.indilib.org > * License : LGPL > Programming Lang: C++ > Description : INDI QSI Driv

wallpapers in debian

Hi, I want to use to transfer pictures wallpapers in debian, where I cansend ? thanks

Re: Bug#656211: ITP: indi-qsi -- INDI QSI Driver

> >> * Package name    : indi-qsi >>   Version         : 0.4 >>   Upstream Author : Sami Lehti , Jasem Mutlaq >> >> * URL             : http://www.indilib.org >> * License         :  LGPL >>   Programming Lang: C++ >>   Description     : INDI QSI Driver >> >> INDI driver for QSI CCD & Filter Wheel

Bug#656234: ITP: six -- Python 2 and 3 compatibility library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Colin Watson * Package name: six Version : 1.1.0 Upstream Author : Benjamin Peterson * URL : http://packages.python.org/six/ * License : Expat Programming Lang: Python Description : Python 2 and 3 compatibility l

Bug#656236: ITP: jcommander -- Java framework for parsing command line parameters

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sylvestre Ledru * Package name: jcommander Version : 1.23 Upstream Author : Cedric Beust * URL : http://jcommander.org/ * License : Apache 2 Programming Lang: Java Description : Java framework for parsing command

clarifying copyright policy (Re: status of DEP5: Machine-readable debian/copyright)

Charles Plessy wrote: > I would love the answer to this question documented somewhere, but I think > that it would not belong to the DEP 5 document. If you would like, you > can send the question to the FTP Master team and CC the bug number #462996 > (“Document requirements for copyright file.”).

Re: status of DEP5: Machine-readable debian/copyright

Bastien ROUCARIES writes: > Yes one question do I need to document aclocal.m4 copyright patchwork ? My take on this (but note that I'm not an ftpmaster): The debian/copyright file serves two separate purposes. First, it's included in binary packages to provide our mandatory license and copyrig

Re: wallpapers in debian

On 17/01/12 15:47, Fabian Delgado wrote: > Hi, I want to use to transfer pictures wallpapers in debian, where I cansend > ? > thanks > I am not sure about your question, probably you are looking for http://www.debianart.org/cchost/ Cheers. kix -- ||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia ||\\// //\

proposed new pseudo-package 'debian-mentors' for handling sponsoring requests

SUMMARY === We plan to ask for the creation of a new pseudo-package debian-mentors or mentors.debian.org [3] (contact: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org) in Debian's bug tracking system (the name is still subject to change). A workflow for handling sponsoring requests is proposed below. It is ba

Re: Bug#656142: ITP: duff -- Duplicate file finder

Hello, On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:12:58AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > rdfind seems to be quickest one, but duff compares well with hardlink, > which (see http://liw.fi/dupfiles/) was the fastest one I knew of in > Debian so far. Does anyone know of a duplicate file finder that can keep its dat

Bug#656275: ITP: python-django-djblets -- A collection of useful extensions for Django.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry Nezhevenko * Package name: python-django-djblets Version : 0.6.15 Upstream Author : Christian Hammond, David Trowbridge, Micah Dowty * URL : https://github.com/djblets/djblets * License : MIT Programming Lang: Py

Bug#656277: ITP: ruby-net-http-digest-auth -- RFC 2617 Digest Access Authentication implementation

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Gunnar Wolf * Package name: ruby-net-http-digest-auth Version : 1.3 Upstream Author : Eric Hodel * URL : http://docs.seattlerb.org/net-http-digest_auth/Net/HTTP/DigestAuth.html * License : MIT Programming Lang: Ruby

Bug#656279: ITP: ruby-net-http-persistent -- Manages persistent connections using Net::HTTP

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Gunnar Wolf * Package name: ruby-net-http-persistent Version : 2.3.3 Upstream Author : © 2010 Eric Hodel © 2010 Aaron Patterson * URL : http://docs.seattlerb.org/net-http-persistent * License : MIT P

Re: proposed new pseudo-package 'debian-mentors' for handling sponsoring requests

Le Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:59:14PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : > SUMMARY > === > > We plan to ask for the creation of a new pseudo-package > debian-mentors or mentors.debian.org [3] (contact: > debian-ment...@lists.debian.org) in Debian's bug tracking system (the > name is still subject

Bug#656282: ITP: ruby-domain-name -- Domain Name manipulation library for Ruby

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Gunnar Wolf * Package name: ruby-domain-name Version : 0.5.1 Upstream Author : Akinori MUSHA * URL : http://github.com/knu/ruby-domain_name * License : BSD Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Domain Name manipula

Bug#656284: ITP: ruby-unf -- Wrapper library to bring Unicode Normalization Form support to Ruby

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Gunnar Wolf * Package name: ruby-unf Version : 0.0.4 Upstream Author : Akinori MUSHA * URL : http://github.com/knu/unf * License : MIT Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Wrapper library to bring Unicode Normaliz

Clarifying the mandatory contents of the Debian copyright file.

Dear FTP Masters, in http://bugs.debian.org/462996, me and others have expressed interest to have a written document that describes precisely what the Debian copyright file must contain. Do you think it is realisable, and if yes, how could we help you ? Would you like to be submitted a draft ?

dpkg-source again broken wrt to 3.0 (quilt)???

Hi everyone, maybe its just me, but I cannot get the hang of that 3.0 (quilt) and pre/post applying patches. Recently I prepared a NMU for less to finally fix the missing xz(tar.xz) support, added a new patch, but it is *impossible* for me to build a package. Irrelevant wether the patches were ap

Re: dpkg-source again broken wrt to 3.0 (quilt)???

* Norbert Preining , 2012-01-18, 09:15: dpkg-source: info: using options from less-444/debian/source/options: --compression=bzip2 --compression-level=9 dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)' dpkg-source: info: building less using existing ./less_444.orig.tar.bz2 patching file debia

Re: dpkg-source again broken wrt to 3.0 (quilt)???

On Mi, 18 Jan 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Wait, are you patching files inside debian/? That won't fly. Umpf, and, is that so evil? Esp for a NMU this is *very* good as it allows to see what the changes of the NMU are ... Not that I am patching debian/control or debina/rules ... Best wishes Norber

Re: dpkg-source again broken wrt to 3.0 (quilt)???

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18.01.2012 03:08, Norbert Preining wrote: > Umpf, and, is that so evil? Esp for a NMU this is *very* good > as it allows to see what the changes of the NMU are ... debdiff(1)/nmudiff(1). Or just ... diff and don't add it to debian/patches/series, a

Re: Clarifying the mandatory contents of the Debian copyright file.

On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 09:49 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > interest to have a written document that describes precisely > what the Debian copyright file must contain. Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate the DEP-5 debian/copyright file? I am my own upstream for

Re: Clarifying the mandatory contents of the Debian copyright file.

Peter Miller writes: > Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate > the DEP-5 debian/copyright file? > I am my own upstream for many projects, and some of them have thousands > of source files. There is no way I am going to write and maintain > debian/copyright in D

Re: Clarifying the mandatory contents of the Debian copyright file.

Peter Miller wrote: > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 09:49 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > interest to have a written document that describes precisely > > what the Debian copyright file must contain. > > Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate > the DEP-5 debian/copyright

Re: Clarifying the mandatory contents of the Debian copyright file.

On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 18:20 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Peter Miller writes: > > This objection makes me think that you believe that more information is > required by the DEP-5 format than is in your existing debian/copyright > files. My understanding is that all project files are covered, alth

Re: Clarifying the mandatory contents of the Debian copyright file.

Peter Miller writes: > My understanding is that all project files are covered, although > wildcards are permitted. > Each different copyright x license combination needs its own separate > entry. I don't think this is the case. I see no reason why you couldn't just have a Files: * stanza that

Re: dpkg-source again broken wrt to 3.0 (quilt)???

Hi, On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Norbert Preining wrote: > So, let the flame war start again, or the enlightning procedure. I am open > to explanations. It would be nice if you could avoid the "flaming tone" in all your mails. In particular since most of the time it ends up being a mistake of yours. On