Re: Removing web server dependencies from web apps

2012-01-09 Thread Raphael Geissert
Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] > The issue is that most PHP packages in Debian have dependencies on web > servers, most of the time with something like this: > > Depends: apache2 | httpd, libapache2-mod-php5 | php5-cgi Leaving aside use cases, workarounds (ugly hacks, I would call them), etc... I p

Re: Uploader field containing the same as Maintainer

2012-01-09 Thread Raphael Geissert
Enrico Zini wrote: > Before I just silence the warning in my import script, I'm posting here > the full list. Some (like blankon and dlg-neu) are obviously bugs, but > have already been fixes: the script also imports package data from > stable. FWIW, http://lintian.debian.org/tags/maintainer-also-

Re: [Long] UEFI support

2012-01-09 Thread Bjørn Mork
Tanguy Ortolo writes: > Paul Wise, 2012-01-09 00:44+0100: >> Sounds like he was asking you to name these new 32-bit only x86 >> systems that are still being produced and sold. > > That is right. In fact, I do not doubt there are some 32 bits only > processors sold today, but I am not sure that the

Re: GPG key issue

2012-01-09 Thread Daniel Martí
As spanish, I have two surnames as well. I'll just keep on using the first one online, like anyone else. It gives us a bit more privacy :-) Cheers. Francesco Namuri wrote: >Hi, > >I have become DD in last days, in all my NM process, and in all my >debian >work I used only my first and last nam

Re: Bug#654116: RFH: screen -- terminal multiplexor with VT100/ANSI terminal emulation

2012-01-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
I didn't try it Would that one help? https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0ad49c.3010...@debian.org

Bug#655220: ITP: curvedns -- Forwarding implementation of the DNSCurve protocol

2012-01-09 Thread Sergiusz Pawlowicz
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sergiusz Pawlowicz * Package name: curvedns Version : 0.87 Upstream Author : CurveDNS developers * URL : http://curvedns.on2it.net/ * License : CurveDNS (retain COPYRIGHT file, public domain) Programming Lang: C, C++

Bug#655222: ITP: filebench -- ITP: filebench - file system and storage benchmark with flexible workload specification

2012-01-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Steigerwald * Package name: filebench Version : 1.4.9.1 Upstream Author : Vasily Tarasov (v...@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu) and others * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/filebench/ * License : CDDL 1.0 Programming Lan

Bug#655224: ITP: fsmark -- ITP: fs_mark - benchmark for simulating synchronous write workloads

2012-01-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Steigerwald * Package name: fsmark Version : 3.3 Upstream Author : Ric Wheeler * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fsmark/ * License : GPL v2 or later Programming Lang: C Description : ITP: fs_mark - b

Bug#655227: ITP: yafaray-exporter -- modern, xml-speaking raytracing-based rendering system (exporter package)

2012-01-09 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Matteo F. Vescovi" * Package name: yafaray-exporter Version : 0.1.2~beta2.3 Upstream Author : Bert Buchholz Michele Castigliego Rodrigo Placencia Vázquez * URL : http://www.yafaray.org/

Re: [Long] UEFI support

2012-01-09 Thread Wookey
+++ Steve Langasek [2012-01-06 16:08 -0800]: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:41:41PM +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > > > It is also worth noting that an amd64 PC will probably support x64 UEFI > > only, so given that there is probably no UEFI-base x86 PCs, there is no > > point in creating correspondin

gimp-dimage-color

2012-01-09 Thread mike dillon
Hello my name is Michael. I would like to take over the gimp-dimage-color package maintenance. That said I have never done this before, so I may need some help to show how certain thing are done at first. Though I am here to learn. Thanks, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-req

Re: Providing a dummy web server package in Debian (Removing web server dependencies from web apps)

2012-01-09 Thread Wookey
+++ Steve Langasek [2012-01-08 05:23 +0100]: > > It would be very wrong to bypass the dependency system in the archive on > account of the filesystem cross-mount tricks described here. Using equivs > locally is the *right* solution for such cases. I think steve is right here, even though it is i

Bug#655230: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread Al Biheiri
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Al Biheiri * Package name: pushkey Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Al Biheiri * URL : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/77428/website-dev/index.htm * License : (GPL v3) Programming Lang: (Bash) Description : Pushes your s

Bug#655232: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread Al Biheiri
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Al Biheiri * Package name: pushkey Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Al Biheiri * URL : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/77428/website-dev/index.htm * License : (GPL v3) Programming Lang: (bash) Description : Pushes your s

Bug#655233: ITP: pushkey -- Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread Al Biheiri
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Al Biheiri * Package name: pushkey Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Al Biheiri * URL : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/77428/website-dev/index.htm * License : GPL v3 Programming Lang: bash Description : Pushes your ssh k

Re: Bug#655230: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 forcemerge 655230 655232 655233 thanks Hi, On 09.01.2012 15:43, Al Biheiri wrote: > Description : Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to > create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys. What makes yo

Re: Bug#655233: ITP: pushkey -- Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Al Biheiri (09/01/2012): > * Package name: pushkey > Version : 1.0 > Upstream Author : Al Biheiri > * URL : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/77428/website-dev/index.htm > * License : GPL v3 > Programming Lang: bash > Description : Pushes your ssh key to a remote

Re: Bug#655230: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, On 01/09/2012 03:43 PM, Al Biheiri wrote: * Package name: pushkey Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Al Biheiri * URL : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/77428/website-dev/index.htm * License : (GPL v3) Programming Lang: (Bash) Description : Pushes your ssh

Bug#655235: ITP: vim-pyclewn -- Pyclewn allows using vim as a front end to a debugger. Currently it supports gdb and pdb

2012-01-09 Thread medhamsh
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: medhamsh * Package name: vim-pyclewn Version : 1.7 Upstream Author : Xavier de Gaye * URL : http://pyclewn.sourceforge.net/index.html * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description : Pyclewn allows using v

Re: Bug#655232: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread James McCoy
On Jan 9, 2012 10:03 AM, "Al Biheiri" wrote: > * Package name: pushkey > Version : 1.0 > Upstream Author : Al Biheiri > * URL : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/77428/website-dev/index.htm > * License : (GPL v3) > Programming Lang: (bash) > Description : Pushes your

Re: Bug#655232: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread YunQiang Su
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:04 AM, James McCoy wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2012 10:03 AM, "Al Biheiri" wrote: > > * Package name: pushkey > > Version : 1.0 > > Upstream Author : Al Biheiri > > * URL : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/77428/website-dev/index.htm > > * License :

Re: Removing web server dependencies from web apps

2012-01-09 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 01/07/2012 05:11 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: Having, say, mediawiki, ask using debconf if you would like a vhost set up with the host name wiki.$domain would be completely sane, IMO. If you don't want it, just tell the config script no. i thouhg it would be implicitly clear that if the user

Re: Bug#655230: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread Al
I'm sorry you guys feel like I am wasting your time as I had no intention of doing that. As your probably aware this is my first time I am submitting an ITP so I am new to the whole process. I did not know I submitted the ITP twice. The reportbug application crashed with a segfault warning so I as

Re: [Long] UEFI support

2012-01-09 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
Wookey, 2012-01-09 15:04+0100: > I assume evyone here is aware of mjg's useful posts about the issue of > key-management in UEFI secure boot? > > We need to do one of: > > * get our bootloaders signed by something like the 'linuxfoundation key' > if such a thing gets widely installed, > * explai

Re: [Long] UEFI support

2012-01-09 Thread Iustin Pop
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 04:29:12PM +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > Wookey, 2012-01-09 15:04+0100: > > I assume evyone here is aware of mjg's useful posts about the issue of > > key-management in UEFI secure boot? > > > > We need to do one of: > > > > * get our bootloaders signed by something like t

Re: [Long] UEFI support

2012-01-09 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
Iustin Pop, 2012-01-09 19:57+0100: > Hmm, I might misunderstand this, but wouldn't just the grub binary need > to be signed? And this binary then would parse the grub.cfg file and > allow various kernels to boot. Negative. Or rather, at least not the way GRUB currently works, since it embeds in it

Re: arliebox...U.S..Government -Wants to Help-You..

2012-01-09 Thread Arlie Box
Shove your fucking SPAM up your Ass! On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:01 PM, wrote: > > > > Have_money_troubles? > > .Get_the..financial_help_you_need_today!.. > > understandmanager.com//gcl.html?1d=1ngtbkusfrgm2x4.gC19M._1y105.26953ODJmNmExNW1jNTlp0k3tHY > > > > > Millions_of..dollars_in..Free-Governme

Re: arliebox...U.S..Government -Wants to Help-You..

2012-01-09 Thread lucas.g...@gmail.com
Way to spam everyone else. G On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Arlie Box wrote: > Shove your fucking SPAM up your Ass! > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:01 PM, wrote: > >> >> >> >> Have_money_troubles? >> >> .Get_the..financial_help_you_need_today!.. >> >> understandmanager.com//gcl.html?1d=1ngtbkusf

Re: [Long] UEFI support

2012-01-09 Thread Philip Hands
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:04:15 +, Wookey wrote: > +++ Steve Langasek [2012-01-06 16:08 -0800]: > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:41:41PM +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > > > > > It is also worth noting that an amd64 PC will probably support x64 UEFI > > > only, so given that there is probably no UEFI-

Re: [Long] UEFI support

2012-01-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:04:49PM +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > Iustin Pop, 2012-01-09 19:57+0100: > > Hmm, I might misunderstand this, but wouldn't just the grub binary need > > to be signed? And this binary then would parse the grub.cfg file and > > allow various kernels to boot. > > Negative.

Re: [Long] UEFI support

2012-01-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:01:00PM +, Philip Hands wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:04:15 +, Wookey wrote: [...] > > * get our bootloaders signed by something like the 'linuxfoundation key' > > if such a thing gets widely installed, > > * explain to users how to get the 'debian key' install

Re: Bug#655185: RFP: pxz -- parallel xz compressor

2012-01-09 Thread Joey Hess
Chow Loong Jin wrote: > > Good question. Not sure if pristine-tar supports xz already at all. > > I thought it did, but upon closer inspection, it looks like pristine-tar has > been generating deltas for banshee's xz tarballs from ftp.gnome.org larger > than > the original tarballs themselves. A

Proposed entry for next DPN [was: Re: Providing a dummy web server package in Debian (Removing web server dependencies from web apps)]

2012-01-09 Thread Andrei Popescu
[Reply-To: set to -publicity] On Lu, 09 ian 12, 14:39:03, Wookey wrote: > > And equivs is an incredicbly-useful well-kept secret (of which Debian > and GNU/Linux has many). Any suggestions for making it better known > would be good. This disucssion has no doubt helped a little. Hi -publicity, T

Bug#655270: ITP: libshairport -- emulates an AirPort Express

2012-01-09 Thread Andres Mejia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andres Mejia * Package name: libshairport Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Team XBMC * URL : http://xbmc.org/ * License : MIT/X Programming Lang: C Description : emulates an AirPort Express This program emulates

Re: Bug#654116: RFH: screen -- terminal multiplexor with VT100/ANSI terminal emulation

2012-01-09 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I didn't try it As mentioned somewhere else in the thread I did once try either retty or reptyr (can't remember) and it didn't work very well. > https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr It's also packaged for Debian. :-) I though think it's a not so good idea to require th

Re: Bug#655230: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread Al
jI have uploaded the correct package now including the debian source. They are located here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/77428/website-dev/index.htm This might seem trivial but it helped enough people I work with that I thought I should contribute the code. Instead of running "ssh-copy-id -i identityN

Re: Bug#655230: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:43:27PM -0500, Al wrote: > This might seem trivial but it helped enough people I work with that I thought > I should contribute the code. Instead of running "ssh-copy-id -i identityName > IPADDR" , all you had to do was "pushkey IPADDR". The difference between my > packag

Re: Bug#655230: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread Al
OK I guess I am partially incorrect, however if .ssh or authorized_keys is wrong permission, ssh-copy-id doesn't fix it.. I set .ssh folder to 777 and ssh-copy-id did not change it. On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:43:27PM -0500, Al wrote: > > T

Re: Bug#655230: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

2012-01-09 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
Hi Al, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Al wrote: > OK I guess I am partially incorrect, however if .ssh or authorized_keys is > wrong permission, ssh-copy-id doesn't fix it.. > I set .ssh folder to 777 and ssh-copy-id did not change it. That is the sane behavior here. The utilities that come in