Le Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:01:44PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
> With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to
> build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing
> this was a lenny release goal, maybe it should be one again?!? Most
> importantly,
On 20/12/11 at 23:16 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to
> > > build twice in a row, because of uncommitte
Enrico Weigelt, 2011-12-21 05:35+0100:
> The reasons for that separation in FHS are far more than just
> historical slowless/expensiveness of larger spindles.
>
> / should only contain things needed for boot up into singleuser,
> /usr should hold all the rest.
I tend to agree. At least, this is h
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> I tend to agree. At least, this is how I interpret the FHS, and it seems
> appropriate to me. Although it may not be useful in most cases, I do not
> see it as harmful.
The harm is if it takes us extra development time because other distributions
don't
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 09:55:23PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
The harm is if it takes us extra development time because other
distributions don't support it, provide configuration options for it, or
test it.
Well, this happens with other things as well. There was a time, when
Debian was the
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> True, but / as emergency system is still a valid reason. That’s why
> I keep / and /boot outside LVM, so that I can repair/rename/change the
> LVM system. I did this more than once.
When was the last time you needed to do that?
AFAIK the only reason
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 20.12.2011, 21:36 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to
> > build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing
> > this was a lenny relea
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:32:35PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On 16.12.2011 18:38, Joey Hess wrote:
>> > Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> >> I'm inclined to follow this advice and would indeed propose that the
>> >> "atomic" partman-auto recipe is kept, however without a s
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le samedi 17 décembre 2011 à 17:42 +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>> I do recommend a separate /usr to anyone. It's *not* safe to say that,
>> and I know many people that agree with me. To me, it has, and still is,
>> the best choice. You have no rights to arbitrar
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> PS: I myself like a seperate /usr but I wouldn't use it for my parents.
> I do want a seperate /var and /home for them though so they can't DOS
> the system by filling up their home.
How would filling up /home DOS the system?
The only common pro
Russell Coker writes:
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> > Doing this has many advantage. Like, if your laptop has to unexpectedly
>> > reboot (like when you inadvertently removed power cord when batteries
>> > were not plugged, which happens often in real life), having separated
Roger Leigh writes:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 06:48:53PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Josh Triplett writes:
>>
>> > I disagree; I think it leads to a significant burden. Having /var
>> > separate requires pre-determining an appropriate size for it, and that
>> > will vary wildly betwe
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Also / and /usr can be read-only and definetly should be on a systems
> likely to have power outages like laptops. And with a read-only
> partition you have neither fsck nor journal replay.
You don't have a fsck if the time/count for a fsck hasn'
Darren Salt writes:
> I demand that Ben Hutchings may or may not have written...
>
>> On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 20:42 +, Philip Hands wrote:
>> We're now debating what, if any, effort we should make to continue to
>> support running init scripts without /usr mounted. There is also
>> discussion
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> On 20/12/11 at 23:16 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> > On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to
>> > > build twice
Charles Plessy writes:
> Le Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:01:44PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
>> With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to
>> build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing
>> this was a lenny release goal, maybe it should be on
Hi!
As the new Erlang R15B is out I'd like to upload it to unstable. There
are a few backwardly incompatible changes, so it's better to test
whether the packages which reverse-depend on Erlang work successfully
with R15B.
The packages which require testing are:
ejabberd (certainly will not work,
Package: nerdtree
Severity: wishlist
Owner: medhamsh
* Package name: nerdtree
Version : 4.1.0
Upstream Author : Marty Grenfell
* URL : http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1658
* License : (Public Domain)
Programming Lang: (Ruby)
Description
Sergei Golovan (21/12/2011):
> Erlang R15B is already in experimental, so please, test and modify
> your packages if necessary. I'd like to upload R15B into unstable by
> the end of December.
I suggest you get in touch with the release team to plan this
transition.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
De
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Sergei Golovan (21/12/2011):
>> Erlang R15B is already in experimental, so please, test and modify
>> your packages if necessary. I'd like to upload R15B into unstable by
>> the end of December.
>
> I suggest you get in touch with the rele
Josh Triplett writes:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 06:48:53PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Josh Triplett writes:
>> > spools (/var/spool/mail), large websites in the default location
>> > (/var/www), or large databases (/var/lib/postgresql or similar) will
>> > need a lot more. The same a
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> * I will need to arrange for the same LD_PRELOAD setting to load the
>>correct libauthbind for each arch. So I guess I do
>>LD_PRELOAD=libauthbind.so.1 rather than supplying an absolute path,
>>and trust ld.so to g
Goswin von Brederlow writes ("Re: authbind (LD_PRELOAD) and multiarch"):
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
> > What does fakeroot do? My first idea would be to fail early and provide a
> > useful error message.
>
> fake(ch)root sets LD_PRELOAD=lib.so and
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/usr/lib/fakeroot:/usr/lib32/fa
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:24:58PM +0530, medhamsh wrote:
> * Package name: nerdtree
The binary package should be vim-nerdtree.
> Version : 4.1.0
> Upstream Author : Marty Grenfell
> * URL : http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1658
> * License : (P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tobias Frost
* Package name: solarpowerlog
Version : 0.21
Upstream Author : Tobias Frost
* URL : http://solarpowerlog.coldtobi.de
* License : GPL, LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : logging photovoltaic dat
Hi,
Should I close this bug and resubmit with
proper information?
Thanks,
--
Medhamsh
On Wed, December 21, 2011 10:49 pm, James McCoy wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:24:58PM +0530, medhamsh wrote:
>
>> * Package name: nerdtree
>>
>
> The binary package should be vim-nerdtree.
>
>
>> Vers
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 03:39:37PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Josh Triplett writes:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 06:48:53PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Josh Triplett writes:
> >> > spools (/var/spool/mail), large websites in the default location
> >> > (/var/www), or large
On 2011-12-21 10:42:56 -0800 (-0800), Josh Triplett wrote:
> People expect that they can use all the capacity of their disk
> without having to take unusual steps like resizing partitions and
> filesystems. After installing Debian on a 1TB drive, "df -h"
> should say that you have just under 1TB of
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:42:02PM +0530, Medhamsh wrote:
> Should I close this bug and resubmit with
> proper information?
No, you don't need to. The intent of the bug (declaring your intent to
package NERD tree) is still valid. These are just comments to keep in
mind as you prepare the packagi
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:08:17PM +, The Fungi wrote:
> On 2011-12-21 10:42:56 -0800 (-0800), Josh Triplett wrote:
> > People expect that they can use all the capacity of their disk
> > without having to take unusual steps like resizing partitions and
> > filesystems. After installing Debian o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ernesto Hernández-Novich (USB)"
* Package name: libdevel-stacktrace-withlexicals-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Shawn M Moore
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-StackTrace-WithLexicals/
* License : Artist
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Schlichting
* Package name: libdbix-connector-perl
Version : 0.47
Upstream Author : David E. Wheeler
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~dwheeler/DBIx-Connector-0.47/
* License : GPL-1+ or Artistic
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Schlichting
* Package name: libalgorithm-combinatorics-perl
Version : 0.26
Upstream Author : Xavier Noria (FXN),
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~fxn/Algorithm-Combinatorics-0.26/
* License : GPL-1+ or Artistic
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:16:53PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:08:17PM +, The Fungi wrote:
> > On 2011-12-21 10:42:56 -0800 (-0800), Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > People expect that they can use all the capacity of their disk
> > > without having to take unusual steps li
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.100
Severity: grave
Justification: zero documentation, wasting hours of development time, causing
many bugs
I've just wasted multiple hours trying to fix up the mess in an NMU
(#652369). That bug itself isn't necessarily caused by CDBS itself,
but a lot of the time I've
Hi!
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:43:19 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I think an important point to consider is that /usr would not
> > disappear. It could be replaced by a symlink for new installs.
> > This would permit older installs to continue to use /usr, but
> > the files woul
On 12/22/2011 02:42 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> People expect that they can use all the capacity of their disk without
> having to take unusual steps like resizing partitions and filesystems.
> After installing Debian on a 1TB drive, "df -h" should say that you have
> just under 1TB of free space, n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Cheng
* Package name: logisim
Version : 2.7.1
Upstream Author : Carl Burch
* URL : http://ozark.hendrix.edu/~burch/logisim/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Java
Description : graphical tool for desig
38 matches
Mail list logo
