Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "أحمد المحمودي"
* Package name: libitl-gobject
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
* URL : http://git.ojuba.org/cgit/libitl-gobject
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-11-25 06:35, Richard wrote:
> I was always under the impression it was worth checking with others
> before raising a bug, and keeping the volume of bug request down.
You missed my point with doing "proper bug reports". This is a good read
on
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:35:35AM GMT, Richard wrote:
> I was always under the impression it was worth checking with others before
> raising a bug, and keeping
> the volume of bug request down.
It is, not on debian-devel though.
debian-devel
- Development of Debian, Discussion about technical
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:14:18 +
Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:35:35AM GMT, Richard wrote:
> > I was always under the impression it was worth checking with others before
> > raising a bug, and keeping
> > the volume of bug request down.
>
> It is, not on debian-devel though.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Danjou
* Package name: django-openstack
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : OpenStack
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-openstack/0.4
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Django in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Laszlo Kajan
* Package name: libai-fann-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Salvador Fandino
* URL : http://fann.sf.net/
* License : Perl Artistic License
Programming Lang: C, C++, Perl
Description : Perl wrap
probably generate more confusion with the similarity to mingw32. I'd vote for
mingw-w64-i686 and mingw-w64-x86_64 in the end, based on the following:
Me too!
How about the following base description:
MinGW-w64 provides a development and runtime environment for 32- and 64-bit
(x86 and x64)
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 at 03:07:16 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> I'd vote for
> mingw-w64-i686 and mingw-w64-x86_64 in the end
It'll have to be x86-64 (or even x86.64) in package names, since _ isn't
allowed there, but the general principle seems OK.
There is precedent in the archive for replacing th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Danjou
* Package name: openstackx
Version : git
Upstream Author : Jacob Kaplan-Moss
* URL : https://github.com/cloudbuilders/openstackx
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : OpenStack clien
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Danjou
* Package name: python-keystoneclient
Version : git
Upstream Author : Nebula, Inc
* URL : https://github.com/4P/python-keystoneclient
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Python
Description : client
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 650032 general
Bug #650032 [unknown] GUI Won't Start
Warning: Unknown package 'unknown'
Bug reassigned from package 'unknown' to 'general'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 6.0.3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
I had trouble getting the non-free firmware to help so after a compilation of
about ten articles here it is:
My xorg.conf did not exist
I used editor and typed this up:
Section "Device"
Identifier "VGA"
Driver "vesa"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Default Screen"
De
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:55:53AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> As long as the behaviour is always *consistent* across native builds and
> cross-builds, I would be happy with having all .mo files with the same
> endianness. By preference, little endian.
I agree; little-endian is both the most com
13 matches
Mail list logo
