Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Octavio Alvarez
* Package name: superkb
Version : 0.22
Upstream Author : Octavio Alvarez
* URL : http://superkb.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C
Description : Keyboard-based launcher with un
Le lundi 07 novembre 2011 à 01:26 +0100, Andreas Bombe a écrit :
> I for one could see the tcpd case make sense… It does not belong on
> root's $PATH, but since it needs to be available to other packages (such
> as inetd) it can't be put in /usr/lib/$PACKAGE because then calling it
> would depend
[Ian Jackson]
> 2. Obviously the right answer with a standardisation decision you
>don't like is to wait until (a) it's implemented everywhere and
>(b) the people you originally disagreed with have moved on to
>other things, and then to change the standard to be the way you
>always
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 11:36:05PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:25:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > What is the use case?
>
> > The use case is to have a place for executables that are treated
> > similarly to librar
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: openmcdf
Version : 1.5.2
Upstream Author : Federico Blaseotto
* URL : http://openmcdf.sf.net
* License : MPL 1.1
Programming Lang: C#
Description : Structured Storage Explorer
O
Jonathan Nieder writes ("Is anyone maintaining (the ham radio tool) node?"):
> No response from the "node" package maintainers. My offer still
> stands, but I am worried that this is not going to be fixed before the
> next release.
>
> So, what next?
Our policy says that if consensus cannot be r
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I no longer use boa-constructor and I am not interested in maintaining it
anymore.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201
Josselin Mouette writes:
> We already have $pkglibdir and $pkgdatadir for those. There is no
> technical need for a new directory in /usr, and it doesn’t improve
> anything for users.
Possibly not for the users, but it _certainly_ improves the environment
for system and application administrator
* Stig Sandbeck Mathisen [07 09:55]:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
>
> > We already have $pkglibdir and $pkgdatadir for those. There is no
> > technical need for a new directory in /usr, and it doesn’t improve
> > anything for users.
>
> Possibly not for the users, but it _certainly_ improves
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:33:33PM +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
>
> > We already have $pkglibdir and $pkgdatadir for those. There is no
> > technical need for a new directory in /usr, and it doesnt improve
> > anything for users.
>
> Possibly not for the users
Pau Garcia i Quiles writes ("Re: Dealing with embedded javascript libraries"):
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Ian Jackson
> wrote:
> > The difficulty is that if we end up with ten different versions of
> > some random javascript library, when it turns out to have a security
> > vulnerability w
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 01:09:31AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 04 novembre 2011 à 21:21 +, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> > It's not a GNU invention; I believe it derives from BSD.
>
> I stand corrected. That doesn’t make it have any more sense, though.
>
> > Apparently it's for
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:12:42PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * JS library packages should be versioned in the name, like C runtime
>library packages are, so that multiple versions are coinstallable.
Why not _one_ package per lib and multiple (a sane number of) versions
in it? The security t
Le 07/11/2011 20:03, Bastian Blank a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:12:42PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
* JS library packages should be versioned in the name, like C runtime
library packages are, so that multiple versions are coinstallable.
Why not _one_ package per lib and multiple (a
On 07/11/2011, at 2:20 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Should the binary on the ham radio side be called ax25-node, or
> LinuxNode, or something like that? Given a proposed name, I would be
> happy enough to assume I have your blessing and start sending patches
> to the node bug. :)
I have to pop my
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 09:16:21PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Le 07/11/2011 20:03, Bastian Blank a écrit :
> >On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:12:42PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >> * JS library packages should be versioned in the name, like C runtime
> >>library packages are, so that multiple
reassign 555034 wnpp
retitle 555034 O: mlview - xml editor for GNOME environment
thanks
Hi,
I am hereby orphaning mlview[1] on behalf of Sebastian Bacher. As it is
RC buggy and has a very low popcon, I intend to RM within 14 days unless
someone picks it up.
~Niels
[1]
Package: mlview
Version
17 matches
Mail list logo
