Jakub Adam writes:
> With this additional support, a vast repository of C/C++ code can be
> checked out, built, and maintained under the CDT rather easily without
> having to resort to the command line.
Nice!
[Maybe "having to resort" is a bit judgemental in tone, though ...]
-miles
--
Logic,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: exodusII
Version : 5.1
Upstream Author : Gregory Sjaardema
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/exodusii/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Finite element ana
This Intellectual property rubbish is beginning to make me angry.
What now?
Are we expected, each and everyone of us, supposed to pay a stipend to
some johnny-come-lately opportunist?
http://blog.joda.org/2011/10/today-time-zone-database-was-closed.html
Regards,
Weaver.
--
"In a world without
Hi.
Le jeudi 06 octobre 2011 à 21:26 -0400, David Prévot a écrit :
> Le 06/10/2011 20:43, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
> >
> > [Olivier Berger]
> >> For users, which don't read d-d-a and receive such emails (below),
> >> it's a bit unclear what's really happening, IMHO :-/
> >
> > Ummm ... don't we
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmojo-server-fastcgi-perl
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Árpád Szász
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mojo-Server-Fas
Hello.
Not sure this is correct maillist, though. I can't clearly understand
dependencies between debian/rules binary and build targets.
Let's assume, that both 'build-arch' and 'build-indep' targets provided.
In the Debian policy manual section 4.9 written:
> The build target should depend on
Hi all,
Recently I filed a bug report against git-stuff[0] which itself been
closed with the explanation that it's a duplicate of an earlier bug[1]
which itself has been closed by the maintainer claiming it had been
fixed in version 5-1.
While the new package indeed does not contain the bug itsel
Weaver writes:
> This Intellectual property rubbish is beginning to make me angry. What
> now? Are we expected, each and everyone of us, supposed to pay a
> stipend to some johnny-come-lately opportunist?
> http://blog.joda.org/2011/10/today-time-zone-database-was-closed.html
It's already bac
David Prévot wrote on 2011-10-06 21:26:
> Sure: “All developers are expected to be subscribed to this list.” [0],
> but Oliver was referring to “users”. On the other hand, his example mail
> (To: duplic...@packages.debian.org) is obviously sent to developers, so
> I'd guess no harm is done for ou
* Дмитрий Матросов [111007 16:27]:
> But in the section 7.7 of Debian policy manual:
> > clean, build-arch, and binary-arch
> >Only the Build-Depends and Build-Conflicts fields must be satisfied when
> >these targets are invoked.
> > build, build-indep, binary, and binary-indep
> >The
* Raf Czlonka [111007 17:17]:
> While the new package indeed does not contain the bug itself when
> installed as a new package on a system which hadn't had it before,
> it does not fix the bug if installed on a system with the older version.
As I had problems of understanding this first let me re
the facts..
* #640016 was introduced in version 2-1 on 2011-08-02.
* #640016 was reported on 2011-09-01 and fixed on 2011-09-01 in
version 5-1.
* version 4-1 with the bug migrated on 2011-08-23 to testing,
version 7-1 without the bug migrated on 2011-09-17 to testing.
* testing
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 05:26:03PM BST, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> As I had problems of understanding this first let me recap the
> situation:
>
> git-stuff before 5-1 created a buggy file when getting installed that
> is still causing problems when git-stuff 7-1 is installed.
>
> So it's not so m
no problem Christian -- apologies accepted ;)
thanks for chiming in on the topic.
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011, Christian Brenner wrote:
> Hello Mr. Halchenko,
> I have to apologize to you for my last mail. It seems my mind was
> wandering somewhere else. As Mr. Biebl, was pointing out, you only
> respon
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 06:09:18PM BST, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> my opinion..
[cut]
> * unstable and *testing* users are supposed to be able to cope with
> the one or other glitch, if they don't, they use stable.
I know that, thank you. I've been doing that for nearly a decade.
> * this is
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 18:40:10 +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 06:09:18PM BST, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > my opinion..
> [cut]
> > * unstable and *testing* users are supposed to be able to cope with
> > the one or other glitch, if they don't, they use stable.
>
> I know
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: eclipse-cdt-pkg-config
Version: 0.5.2+svn195
Upstream Author: Petri Tuononen
URL: http://code.google.com/p/pkg-config-support-for-eclipse-c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
I am pleased to announce the unofficial Debian monthly testing snapshot
release for October 2011 (version 2011.10). This release is currently
available for i386 and amd64 as iso images downloadable from:
http://alioth.debian.org/~gilbert-g
Julien Cristau writes ("Re: New package doesn't fix the problem in the old
version"):
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 18:40:10 +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 06:09:18PM BST, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > > * this is a colossal waste of time.
> >
> > All I was trying to do was to es
Russ Allbery writes:
> Weaver writes:
>
> > This Intellectual property rubbish is beginning to make me angry. What
> > now? Are we expected, each and everyone of us, supposed to pay a
> > stipend to some johnny-come-lately opportunist?
>
> > http://blog.joda.org/2011/10/today-time-zone-databas
Joachim Wiedorn writes:
> But nevertheless I had to analyse the removing of my package (duply).
> After a while
Why did it take so long? Aptitude shows immediately that ‘duply’ was to
be removed because ‘duplicity’ was to be removed; and looking one step
further, that ‘duplicity’ was to be remov
Correct gpg signature this time:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
I am pleased to announce the unofficial Debian monthly testing snapshot
release for October 2011 (version 2011.10). This release is currently
available for i386 and amd64 as iso images downloadable from:
h
Ben Finney wrote on 2011-10-08 07:34:
> Why did it take so long? Aptitude shows immediately that ‘duply’ was to
> be removed because ‘duplicity’ was to be removed; and looking one step
Usually I use Debian Stable as productive system. So aptitude would be
not a help. I looked on packages.qa.debia
Ben Finney writes:
> That will be good, but we still need to make a lot of noise about this.
> It's ludicrous that any idiot with a lawyer can bring down a resource
> like the site hosting Olsen timezone data, even temporarily.
ado took the site down voluntarily (almost certainly), so there's re
Ummm ... don't we strongly encourage all package maintainers to read
d-d-a? If not, we should. It is very low traffic and sometimes
important.
Sure: “All developers are expected to be subscribed to this list.” [0],
but Oliver was referring to “users”. On the other hand, his example mail
(To:
Hi Ian,
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
> > > All I was trying to do was to establish was whether you're being
> > > lazy/unhelpful or is there a policy which I've missed as, [...]
I admit that I should have allowed a third possibility here.
> There is a third possibility which is that the
26 matches
Mail list logo
