Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Laszlo Kajan
* Package name: profphd-utils
Version : 1.0.7
Upstream Author : Laszlo Kajan
* URL : http://rostlab.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Fortran
Description : profphd helper utilities convert_seq
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Laszlo Kajan
* Package name: profphd
Version : 1.0.35
Upstream Author : Laszlo Kajan
* URL : http://rostlab.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : secondary structure and solvent accessibility
Greetings, I trust all is well...
What are the new revolutionary changes across the Arabic domain names and what
role do they play on the Gulf markets and global e-commerce?
Here are two interesting articles to provide an overview.
Will you grow giant money-trees?
http://www.bizcommunity.com/A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steven McDonald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: digraphtools
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : David Basden
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/digraphtools
* License : BSD
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Koichi Akabe
* Package name: hts-voice-nitech-jp-atr503-m001
Version : 1.04
Upstream Author : Keiichi Tokuda
* URL : http://open-jtalk.sourceforge.net/
* License : Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
Description : HT
Joey Hess writes ("Re: Bits from dpkg developers - dpkg 1.16.1"):
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > It was always completely wrong of dpkg-buildpackage to set these
> > variables. Source packages are entitled to assume that strange
> > environment variables which cause their tools to do odd things will
> >
I wrote:
> Joey Hess writes ("Re: Bits from dpkg developers - dpkg 1.16.1"):
> > My concern is that we now have a whole history of ill-considered changes
> > to the build flags. To the point that it's possible to argue that every
> > build flag change save one* has been ill-considered. So why are w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessandro Ghedini
* Package name: nqp
Version : 0.1~2011.09
Upstream Author : The NQP Team
* URL : https://github.com/perl6/nqp
* License : Artistic-2.0
Programming Lang: C, Perl
Description : Not Quite Perl comp
On 09/24/2011 05:48 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Joey Hess writes ("Re: Bits from dpkg developers - dpkg 1.16.1"):
>> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> * dpkg-buildpackage no longer exports
>>> CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/LDFLAGS/CPPFLAGS/FFLAGS
>>
>> | You don't know how many packages are broken or no longer
>> | polic
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 14:39:22 Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> * Package name: nqp
This "nqp" name is a bit terse.
How about naming this package "perl-nqp" or, spell it out and name it "not-
quite-perl" ?
All the best
Dominique
--
http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://sea
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:04:00PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 September 2011 14:39:22 Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > * Package name: nqp
>
> This "nqp" name is a bit terse.
That's how it's called. We have many three-letters-acronym packages and I
may be wrong, but "nqp" d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: python-fudge
Version: 1.0.3
Upstream Author: Kumar McMillan
URL: http://farmdev.com/projects/fudge
License: MIT/X
Description:
On 09/27/2011 04:38 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:04:00PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
>> On Tuesday 27 September 2011 14:39:22 Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>>> * Package name: nqp
>>
>> This "nqp" name is a bit terse.
>
> That's how it's called. We have many three
* Bernd Zeimetz [110927 15:36]:
> > I'm one of the submitters of one of the bugs which requested this
> > change. This is a reversion of dpkg to a previous behaviour, and it
> > /un/breaks packages. Or at least I think it unbreaks much more than
> > it breaks.
>
> ACtually I think that is true -
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:24:16PM +0100, Allison Randal wrote:
> On 09/27/2011 04:38 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:04:00PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 27 September 2011 14:39:22 Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> >>> * Package name: nqp
> >>
> >> This
[Alessandro Ghedini]
> It doesn't really sound as intended *only* for Parrot (ok, as of now it
> does support only parrot, but in the future this may change).
>
> Also, aren't parrot-nqp and nqp different things? (parrot-nqp is currently
> used to build nqp).
Are you saying one of them is nqp an
Bernhard R. Link writes ("Re: Bits from dpkg developers - dpkg 1.16.1"):
> CFLAGS and LDFLAGS (and CPPFLAGS and so on) are in my opionion normal
> things to be in a users environment, so a package's rules file should
> in my eyes not depend on them not being set or having any values sensible.
This
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:17:10PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Alessandro Ghedini]
> > It doesn't really sound as intended *only* for Parrot (ok, as of now it
> > does support only parrot, but in the future this may change).
> >
> > Also, aren't parrot-nqp and nqp different things? (parrot
On 09/27/2011 06:39 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:24:16PM +0100, Allison Randal wrote:
> Quoting from the nqp README:
>> is focused on being a high-level way to create compilers and libraries
>> for virtual machines (such as the Parrot Virtual Machine)
>
> It doesn't
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Moorman
* Package name: snes9x
Version : 1.53
Upstream Author : Gary Henderson
* URL : http://www.snes9x.com
* License : Other
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Cross-platform SNES emulator
The old sne
The "forbidden" problem is now fixed. So I plan to chgrp packages soon.
I'll use git to make easier migration keeping the history. To have
permissions, you should be added to tts group. For this, please request
to be added. If you cannot git push anymore, it's because perm will have
been changed. S
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 08:17:54AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Two hardening features are not enabled by default: PIE and bindnow.
> If your package supports PIE, you might want to consider enabling it.
> If the binaries are long running processes like daemons, and as such
> the startup
22 matches
Mail list logo
