Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christopher James Halse Rogers
* Package name: apitrace
Version : 1.0+git
Upstream Author : José Fonseca
* URL : https://github.com/apitrace/apitrace
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++, Python
Description : t
Quoting Olly Betts (o...@survex.com):
> rather than having a separate flag state for those, but the reports have
> been reviewed by a human, so should be higher quality than the
> unfiltered reports from clicks on the "Spam" buttons.
Reports we get through the "Spam" buttons *are* reviewed by
hu
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 05.08.2011, 17:24 +1000 schrieb Christopher James Halse
Rogers:
> * Package name: apitrace
> Version : 1.0+git
> Upstream Author : José Fonseca
> * URL : https://github.com/apitrace/apitrace
> * License : MIT
> Programming Lang: C++, Pytho
Hiya,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:34:45AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Olly Betts (o...@survex.com):
>
> > rather than having a separate flag state for those, but the reports have
> > been reviewed by a human, so should be higher quality than the
> > unfiltered reports from clicks on
Olly Betts schrieb am Friday, den 05. August 2011:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:01:22AM +, Cord Beermann wrote:
> > [we should seperate the GSoC-project from the ListArchiveSpam efforts]
>
> Indeed, I've dropped soc-coordination.
>
> > as i wrote the review-stuff explained in
> > http://wiki
[Satoru KURASHIKI]
> I don't care either of which policy (daemons should start/stop as
> its default), but It would be better that sysadmins are able to
> choose that default (in global setting somewhere like init.conf),
> and each package's /etc/default/* will override that.
This sound like an i
* Alexander Wirt [110804 11:30]:
> P.S. I know its nice to be open. But publishing real names and mailaddresses
> is a problem and at least problematic under german law (and probably for
> other countries).
While publishing real names and mailing addresses might be a problem,
publishing mails sen
Bernhard R. Link schrieb am Friday, den 05. August 2011:
> * Alexander Wirt [110804 11:30]:
> > P.S. I know its nice to be open. But publishing real names and mailaddresses
> > is a problem and at least problematic under german law (and probably for
> > other countries).
>
> While publishing rea
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there address
> will be published? We have several complaints a month about the problem.
Please stick to the topic. In this thread it is about mailing lists.
However,
[sorry for pressing wrong key and sending unfinished mail]
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there address
> will be published? We have several complaints a month about the problem.
Please stick to the
Andreas Tille schrieb am Friday, den 05. August 2011:
> [sorry for pressing wrong key and sending unfinished mail]
>
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there
> > address
> > will be published? We h
* Andreas Tille [2011-08-05 12:39]:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there
> > address
> > will be published? We have several complaints a month about the problem.
>
> Please stick to the topic.
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 01:56:16PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there
> > > address
> > > will be published? We have several complaints a month about the probl
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
I am hereby orphaning eclipse-pydev on behalf of the Java Team.
The package has not seen an upload for over 3 years and has
been RC buggy a bit longer than that.
Should you wish to adopt the package, feel free to
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:41:29AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 03/08/11 17:23, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 03:17:51PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 08:27:04PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 05:38:43PM
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:35:49PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> If you do want it started, that means you need to install it first. Then
> it makes very much sense it is started automatically.
Logical fallacy: "run" implies "install", but "install" doesn't always
mean "run".
--
WBR, wRAR
sig
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:52:22PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:35:49PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > If you do want it started, that means you need to install it first. Then
> > it makes very much sense it is started automatically.
> Logical fallacy: "run" impl
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > > If you do want it started, that means you need to install it first. Then
> > > it makes very much sense it is started automatically.
> > Logical fallacy: "run" implies "install", but "install" doesn't always
> > mean "run".
> Whi
Lars Wirzenius writes:
> Anyone wanting a change to status quo (easy-but-secure) should
> probably make the tools to allow a sysadmin to switch to
> secure-but-easy easily. A patch to update-rc.d to allow overriding
My policy asks me what to do with new services:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 12:27:43AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > > > If you do want it started, that means you need to install it first. Then
> > > > it makes very much sense it is started automatically.
> > > Logical fallacy:
On Friday, August 05, 2011 02:36:13 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 12:27:43AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > > > > If you do want it started, that means you need to install it first.
> > > > > Then it mak
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antonio Terceiro
* Package name: ruby-gherkin
Version : 2.4.5
Upstream Author : Mike Sassak, Gregory Hnatiuk, Aslak Hellesøy
* URL : https://github.com/cucumber/gherkin
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Ruby
Descripti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antonio Terceiro
* Package name: cucumber
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Aslak Hellesøy
* URL : http://cukes.info/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : acceptance testing tool
Cucumber lets sof
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:15:34 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 01:56:16PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> > > And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows
>> > > there address will be publi
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:28:55PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > This does not apply to our topic as well. These lists are not
> > (publicly) archived (or am I missing something?)
>
> BTW, both gmane and the mail archive seem to be archiving the bugs lists.
I have no idea why people are reall
Dear Dima, and everybody,
in order to update the package euca2ools, that is used to operate virtual
machines on cloud systems such as the Amazon EC2, Eucalyptus, or OpenStack, I
would need an update of the m2crypto package.
Dima, I hope that everything is going well for you, as I have not had any
26 matches
Mail list logo
