On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> Hi Olaf, Roger
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Olaf van der Spek
> wrote:
> [...]
>>> Now, pkg-config isn't standardised /either/, but it's useful because
>>> it will work with any standards-conforming compiler. It's just a
>>> gener
(CC'ed debian-devel as this was a not-so-well coordinated MBF without
announcement to debian-devel, dd-list, usertags; so maybe at least further
discussion can happen there)
Hi Florian,
[...]
>
> These lines from this package's maintainer scripts suggest that it likely
> is affected by the vulne
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>> These lines from this package's maintainer scripts suggest that it likely
>> is affected by the vulnerability:
>>
>> ---
>> chmod 640 $FRESHCLAMLOGFILE
>> chown "$d
(copying the thread to debian-devel, where mass-bug-fills *has to* be
discussed, not d-qa)
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 08:23, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The short summary:
>
> 1. There is a privilege escalation vulnerability in stable's logrotate,
> verified to work for switching from the po
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> If you really care about this problem, which is nice, try to get
> logrotate fixed.
As I have said before, I do welcome patches that don't break existing
functionality or introduce new race conditions.
None of my emails to Florian ar
Hi,
On Freitag, 10. Dezember 2010, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> (CC'ed debian-devel as this was a not-so-well coordinated MBF without
> announcement to debian-devel, dd-list, usertags; so maybe at least further
> discussion can happen there)
thanks for that.
I've reassigned all these bugs to logr
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Paul Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
>> If you really care about this problem, which is nice, try to get
>> logrotate fixed.
>
> As I have said before, I do welcome patches that don't break existing
> functionality or
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:00:24PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> I was wondering why you considered the auto linking stuff to be so
> >> horrible.
> >> IMO the best solution would be to get auto link support into GCC too.
> >
> > It's no
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> So?
>
> When we write code, we write it with the intention and expectation
> that it will be built using a standards-conforming compiler. I.e.
> one which implements the C and/or C++ language specification, and
> which also implements standar
Mark Brown wrote:
> The most likely culprit here would seem to be a glibc issue or a local
> misconfiguration caused during the upgrade.
Oh, I used the term 'upgrade', which was misleading.
The system where the bug occurs is an amd64 squeeze installation from
scratch, done last week. (Upgrade fr
Hi,
On 10/12/2010 13:59, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> People who do need this can build multiple versions, install them
>> into different prefixes and then set PKG_CONFIG_PATH to select
>> the variant they want at configure time. Unlike Boos
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> [C] selection of the "tool chain"
> Comment: this seems to be very boost specific!
Not necessary at the moment.
> For what I saw, there is the MT/no thread choice. Are there others ?
> It is possible that boost will be used by differ
On 10/12/2010 16:59, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> [C] selection of the "tool chain"
>> Comment: this seems to be very boost specific!
>
> Not necessary at the moment.
>
>>For what I saw, there is the MT/no thread choice. Are there oth
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Osamu Aoki writes:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:06:45AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:52:28PM -0800, Tristan Schmelcher wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Goswin von Brederlow
>>>
Hi Bernhard,
Am Donnerstag, den 09.12.2010, 12:03 +0100 schrieb Bernhard Hauser:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Bernhard Hauser
>
> * Package name: cnagios
> Version : 0.27
> Upstream Author : Steve Rader
> * URL : ftp://noc.hep.wisc.edu/pub/src/cnagio
Hi,
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> > If you really care about this problem, which is nice, try to get
> > logrotate fixed.
>
> As I have said before, I do welcome patches that don't break existing
> functionality or introduce new race conditions.
Let me quote
Hi,
> (copying the thread to debian-devel, where mass-bug-fills *has to* be
> discussed, not d-qa)
As such I would suggest completely moving this thread over to d-devel
and dropping d-qa from subsequent mails.
[...]
> > If I don't see any solution emerging in a reasonable time frame, my next
> >
Hola!!!
Muchas Bendiciones para ti y tu familia, deseo invitarte a "Bendita la
lluvia" es una comunidad privada cuya actividad se realiza exclusivamente a
través de Internet. Es nació como iniciativa de un grupo de líderes de
diferentes países y continentes, que tienen amplia experiencia en progra
Hi,
> [...]
> >
> > These lines from this package's maintainer scripts suggest that it likely
> > is affected by the vulnerability:
> >
> > ---
> > chmod 640 $FRESHCLAMLOGFILE
> > chown "$dbowner":adm $FRESHCLAMLOGFILE
> > -
Hi,
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> >> These lines from this package's maintainer scripts suggest that it likely
> >> is affected by the vulnerability:
> >>
> >> ---
> >> chmod 640 $FRESHCLAMLOG
HI,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:02:44PM -0800, Tristan Schmelcher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Goswin von Brederlow
> wrote:
> > Osamu Aoki writes:
> >
> >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:06:45AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:52:28PM -0800, Tr
Osamu Aoki writes:
> As I read manpage of dh_md5sums, it states:
>-x, --include-conffiles
>Include conffiles in the md5sums list. Note that this
> information is redundant since it is included elsewhere in debian
> packages.
> I have no idea what this is.
The *.conffiles fil
[Osamu Aoki]
> As I read manpage of dh_md5sums, it states:
>-x, --include-conffiles
>Include conffiles in the md5sums list. Note that this
> information is redundant since it is included elsewhere in debian
> packages.
"Note that this information is redundant" - that's rich.
23 matches
Mail list logo
