On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:37:17AM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Mike Hommey
>python-xpcom (U)
I /think/ this could be solved by not using a pre-depends on
xulrunner-1.9.1. OTOH, the pre-depends solves a part of another
problem though not entirely, due to triggers ordering: the
xulrunner-1.9
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 08:37 -0600, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Debian GNOME Maintainers
>gnome
>gnome-accessibility
>gnome-app-install (U)
>gnome-core
>gnome-dbg
>gnome-desktop-environment
>gnome-devel
>gnome-office
>python-software-properties (U)
>s
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 18. November 2010, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > - download debian-squeeze-di-beta1-i386-CD-1.iso
> > - boot it on a computer without any access to the network
> > - use all default options (but french localisation) until tasksel
> > appears.
> >
> > Result: only "mail server", "SS
Your message dated Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:06:51 +0100
with message-id <201011191106.53050.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#603938: debian-installer: The 1st CD doesn't contain
desktop nor laptop tasks
has caused the Debian Bug report #603938,
regarding debian-installer: The 1st CD does
On 19/11/2010 08:52, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Anyone knows why and how to fix that? Would a “breaks” instead of a
> “conflicts” fix it?
Seems that “Breaks:” doesn't work either:
> Investigating (0) xfce4-settings [ amd64 ] < none -> 4.6.5-3 > ( xfce )
> Broken xfce4-settings:amd64 Breaks on xfc
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Result: only "mail server", "SSH server" and standart system are
> > > available.
> >
> > Unfortunately, that's "expected" result. As discussed on
>
> So let's close this bug. There is no need and gain to keep this bug report
> open (against g
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:32, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On 19/11/2010 08:52, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> Anyone knows why and how to fix that? Would a “breaks” instead of a
>> “conflicts” fix it?
>
> Seems that “Breaks:” doesn't work either:
>
>> Investigating (0) xfce4-settings [ amd64 ] < none
On 19/11/2010 12:29, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> xfce4-mcs-manager recommends it.
> As APT has no indication that this package can go away it does the
> only right thing (TM): Chooses to keep xfce4-mcs-plugins as otherwise
> the user will lose functionality…
> (recommends are defined as installed o
Hi!
Am 22.10.2010 16:26, schrieb Martin Zobel-Helas:
>> The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
>> through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
>> last week.
>>
>> Total number of orphaned packages: 0 (new: 0)
>> Total number of packages
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: fcitx-config
Version : 0.1.3
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/fcitx
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : graphic fcitx configuration tool
--
Reg
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:29:28 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> All of this suggests that the idea to upgrade APT first, as suggested in
> the release notes, is a very bad one. It would work if libapt hadn’t
> changed its ABI in the meantime.
>
Last I checked the squeeze release notes didn't re
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Reporter: IME Packaging Team
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: fcitx-sunpinyin
Version : 0.1.1
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/fcitx
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : sunpiny
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:59, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On 19/11/2010 12:29, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>> xfce4-mcs-manager recommends it.
>> As APT has no indication that this package can go away it does the
>> only right thing (TM): Chooses to keep xfce4-mcs-plugins as otherwise
>> the user wi
David Kalnischkies writes:
> Before you ask, no, debian has no way to say: "this package is obsolete -
> its fine that it will be removed as other packages take care of its tasks."
> The closest thing to that is §7.6.2, but i doubt that this is really such
> a drop-in replacement in your case.
>
[...]
> > Result: only "mail server", "SSH server" and standart system are available.
>
> Unfortunately, that's "expected" result. As discussed on
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/10/msg00311.html
>
> the desktop task has grown quite a bit! More than what a CD can hold, in
> any ca
one more problem
in WIndows 7 then I run setup.exe after every "next" the program is
minimalizet to task bar so I have to click again and again to icon with
debian logo to open show up installer back on the desktop...
--
Kind regards, Lubos Kopecky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-r
Hi all,
I have problem with graphic debian squeeze installer and encrypt
partitions. I din't try text version yet.
I choose manual, then create some partitions on disk, set ext4,
mountpoint / or /home, then back to menu and choose encrypt (it's 4th
line from the top - under lvm, under is lis
On ven., 2010-11-19 at 19:23 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
> So, go and start reading. Debian has a lot of dependencies and you have a
> lot of possibilities because of that.
> You can't use them if you don't know them.
> And, more important, you can't blame APT for being stupid if you don't
Dear Debian Developers!
In the application I am taking part in, I am trying to create a
configuration script to be able to provide two deliverables:
dynamically-linked executable and statically-linked.
The first problem I faced is that it is difficult to explore what should
be the list of librari
Goswin von Brederlow writes:
> Also note that no frontend has ever made use of §7.6.2 and handled
> upgrading obsolete packages to their replacements.
There's a reason for that: it's not possible to create a Policy-compliant
package that could use 7.6.2 in that fashion.
I keep trying to point t
Dmitry Katsubo writes:
> The first problem I faced is that it is difficult to explore what should
> be the list of libraries for static linking (as I have to provide the
> list of libraries which are direct dependencies as well as indirect). I
> know this problem is solved with libtool (which con
Lubos Kopecky wrote:
> one more problem
>
> in WIndows 7 then I run setup.exe after every "next" the program is
> minimalizet to task bar so I have to click again and again to icon with
> debian logo to open show up installer back on the desktop...
Hi Lubos,
could you please report a bug again
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sylvain Le Gall
* Package name: ocaml-extunix
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : ygrek, Sylvain Le Gall, Stephane Glondu
* URL : http://extunix.forge.ocamlcore.org/
* License : LGPL-2.1 with OCaml linking exception
Pro
Kjö Hansi Glaz, le Fri 19 Nov 2010 20:06:46 +0100, a écrit :
> > > Expected result: the desktop and laptop tasks are available.
> >
> > It seems we unfortunately can't expect that any more. We can still
> > probably check that they fit on the 1st+2nd CDs.
> >
>
> I think that it should then made
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 22:10, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On ven., 2010-11-19 at 19:23 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
>>
>> So, go and start reading. Debian has a lot of dependencies and you have a
>> lot of possibilities because of that.
>> You can't use them if you don't know them.
>> And, m
Le Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:06:51AM +0100, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> CDs wont grow in size and I'm pretty sure
> the desktop install sizes wont shrink.
Hi all,
there is actually room for sparing a couple of megabytes, by chosing a more
efficient compression algorithm for the data tar archive in b
I am trying to use 'open()' with some file control flags. According to Linux
manual of 'open()':
int open(const char *path, int flags, ...);
..
The flags specified are formed by or’ing the following values
O_RDONLY open for reading only
O_WRONLY open for writing only
O_RDWR open for readin
How do I determine if a file is a remote mounted file from statfs() call, i.e.
which member of the 'struct statfs' contains information to indicate the file
is
NOT a local file?
Any help is appreciated.
Alex
I want to do atomic operation and find there is already such implementation in
Linux, e.g. atomic_add, atomic_set, atomic_cmpset, etc, after I google on the
Web. I find a libatomic-ops-dev package and install it. But there is still no
man page after the installation. Did I install the right pack
"T. Alex Chen" writes:
> How do I determine if a file is a remote mounted file from statfs()
> call, i.e. which member of the 'struct statfs' contains information to
> indicate the file is NOT a local file?
This is not a very well-defined question, so the answer in general is "you
can't know th
"T. Alex Chen" writes:
> I am trying to use 'open()' with some file control flags. According to
> Linux manual of 'open()':
What Linux man page are you looking at that contains that list? man
open(2) in manpages-dev 3.25-1 doesn't mention either of those flags.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.or
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:56 PM, T. Alex Chen wrote:
> I want to do atomic operation and find there is already such implementation
> in Linux, e.g. atomic_add, atomic_set, atomic_cmpset, etc, after I google on
> the Web. I find a libatomic-ops-dev package and install it. But there is
> still
I must have look it up from either FreeBSD or GNU man page.
I change to use 'flock' after a successful open(). I guess that is equivalent.
Alex
From: Russ Allbery
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Sent: Fri, November 19, 2010 5:01:06 PM
Subject: Re: Where is
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 01:41:49PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow writes:
>
> > Also note that no frontend has ever made use of §7.6.2 and handled
> > upgrading obsolete packages to their replacements.
>
> There's a reason for that: it's not possible to create a Policy-complia
"brian m. carlson" writes:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 01:41:49PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Goswin von Brederlow writes:
>>> Also note that no frontend has ever made use of §7.6.2 and handled
>>> upgrading obsolete packages to their replacements.
>> There's a reason for that: it's not possibl
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 08:37 -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
> Debian Kernel Team
>linux-image-2.6-amd64
>linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
>linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64-dbg
>linux-image-amd64
[...]
Removal of linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 failed because:
"""
You are running a kernel (vers
Just for fun, I had a look at http://popcon.debian.org/ > to see
how the relative distribution of Debian users across oldstable, stabe,
testing and unstable is spread. Today there are 94546 computers
registered in popularity-contest, and as the number of users of
unstable seem to have stabilized,
37 matches
Mail list logo
