Hi there!
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:15:25 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
>
> | I just wondering where I am supposed to find a good smartcard that can
> | take 2048R (or larger) keys, works well with gnupg, and for how much :)
>
> http://shop.kernelconcepts.de/product_
Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010 à 03:08 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> * Hector Oron , 2010-09-15, 21:26:
> > c) allow build depends on source packages, which it is probably a worst
> > idea.
>
> On the contrary, I think that allowing source packages to be installable
> in the same way as binary pack
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:22:57AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Plus, these packages would (in the current state of affairs) lack a
> description.
On this topic, we have our friend #555743.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.juss
Hi there!
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:38:25 +0200, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15 2010, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> As for the large keysize, it is seen as too large. It was recommended
>> that Debian should try to do something that would help reduce the
>> overall threat to the De
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian CLI Applications Team
* Package name: sparkleshare
Version : 0.2~beta1
Upstream Author : Hylke Bons
* URL : http://sparkleshare.org/
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: C#
Description : git-backed file sha
Le 16/09/2010 09:22, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> I agree this is a cleaner solution, but how do you ensure there are
> sources (deb-src) referenced in the sources.list ?
You don't need to. The package would be reported as uninstallable. Some
message suggesting to add deb-src lines to sources.list
Hi folks,
I've collected several rules that upstreams should follow to make
distro maintainer's life much easier:
http://www.metux.de/index.php/de/component/content/article/57.html
Free feel to comment on it :)
cu
--
--
Enr
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:40:30 +0200, Enrico Weigelt
wrote:
> I've collected several rules that upstreams should follow to make
> distro maintainer's life much easier:
>
> http://www.metux.de/index.php/de/component/content/article/57.html
>
> Free feel to comment on it :)
About autoconf stuff:
* Vincent Bernat schrieb:
Hi,
> About autoconf stuff:
> - Why require autogen.sh? On a release, configure script should be
> present. No need to rebuild it.
No, there often *is* a need to rebuild it (actually, much of my
QM work on dozens packages requires changing configure.in+friends).
And
Enrico Weigelt scrisse:
> I've collected several rules that upstreams should follow to make
> distro maintainer's life much easier:
You may also be interested in http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
Cheers, Luca
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso)
: :' : The Universal O
Hi!
Am 15.09.2010 17:07, schrieb Marco d'Itri:
>> I suspect that those figures are because 2048 bits is the default size
>> for RSA keys and 4096 bits is the largest size that GnuPG supports.
> FWIW, the OpenPGP smartcard v2 supports keys up to 3072 bits.
At the recent FrOSCon I have been told,
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 02:02:33PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > FWIW, the OpenPGP smartcard v2 supports keys up to 3072 bits.
> At the recent FrOSCon I have been told, that 4096 bit keys should work,
> but aren't officially supported. (Haven't tested it myself, yet.)
Well, I'
* Luca Bruno schrieb:
> Enrico Weigelt scrisse:
>
> > I've collected several rules that upstreams should follow to make
> > distro maintainer's life much easier:
>
> You may also be interested in http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
Thanks.
It's seems my rules are a bit more rigid and contain
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hannes Wallnoefer
* Package name: ringojs
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Hannes Wallnoefer
* URL : http://ringojs.org/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Java, JavaScript
Description : server-side JavaScr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michele Gastaldo
* Package name: kpartsplugin
Version : 20100723
Upstream Author : Thomas Fischer
* URL : http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~fischer/kpartsplugin/
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: C++
Description :
* Ian Jackson | 2010-09-15 11:56:49 [+0100]:
>Julien Cristau wrote:
>> I'd say they're serious bugs if packages in the archive suffer from
>> the misbuild, and normal ones if not.
>
>I agree.
Okay. In that case I open this weekend bugs against the packages I
identified [0] with severity serious
Enrico Weigelt writes:
> I've collected several rules that upstreams should follow to make
> distro maintainer's life much easier:
> http://www.metux.de/index.php/de/component/content/article/57.html
> Free feel to comment on it :)
You've prohibited upstream distributions that come in multiple
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 492 (new: 2)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 129 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
> You may also be interested in http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
Just added a link to Enrico's page from that.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du jeudi 16 septembre 2010, vers 12:28,
Enrico Weigelt disait :
>> About autoconf stuff:
>> - Why require autogen.sh? On a release, configure script should be
>> present. No need to rebuild it.
> No, there often *is* a need to rebuild it (actually, much of my
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
