On Sep 14, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> pushing Debian towards adopting stronger RSA keys - We have accepted
> some 2048R keys, but if you don't have a real reason to keep your key
> at that size (i.e. you very often build on underpowered machines where
> a 4096R key takes forever, or something like that
Hello,
I just built docbook2x and gettext and both contained the file mentioned
in subject. install-info created dir which got gzip later in the build
process. The strance thing is the almost none of the buildds ship this
file. According to [0] only s390(lxdebian) ships this file in gettext
and qi
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just built docbook2x and gettext and both contained the file mentioned
> in subject. install-info created dir which got gzip later in the build
> process. The strance thing is the almost none of the buildds s
Hi,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (14/09/2010):
> So this is to let you know, to remove this package in order to avoid
> further problems :)
packages really ought to build if that package is installed…
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Aurelien Jarno | 2010-09-14 11:59:51 [+0200]:
>install-info is not present on the kfreebsd-i386 buildds, though it is
>not possible that it was installed at some point.
Maybe it got removed in the meantime. If you look at [0] you see dir.gz.
If you look at build log from himalia1[1] and grep fo
* Cyril Brulebois | 2010-09-14 12:10:01 [+0200]:
>Hi,
Hi,
>Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (14/09/2010):
>> So this is to let you know, to remove this package in order to avoid
>> further problems :)
>
>packages really ought to build if that package is installed???
This is true. However you can't inst
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (14/09/2010):
> > packages really ought to build if that package is installed…
> This is true. However you can't install two packages containing this
> file.
Sorry, I should have been more explicit: build *properly*, i.e. do
what's needed to avoid shipping that file in t
* Cyril Brulebois | 2010-09-14 12:53:20 [+0200]:
>Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (14/09/2010):
>> > packages really ought to build if that package is installed???
>> This is true. However you can't install two packages containing this
>> file.
>
>Sorry, I should have been more explicit: build *properl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov
* Package name: drupal6-mod-imagefield
Version : 3.7
Upstream Author : Nathan Haug (http://drupal.org/user/35821)
* URL : http://drupal.org/project/imagefield
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: PHP
Descript
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:11:14PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Aurelien Jarno | 2010-09-14 11:59:51 [+0200]:
>
> >install-info is not present on the kfreebsd-i386 buildds, though it is
> >not possible that it was installed at some point.
Oops my fault. I wanted to say "not impossi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov
* Package name: drupal6-mod-cck
Version : 2.8
Upstream Author : Yves Chedemois (http://drupal.org/user/39567)
* URL : http://drupal.org/project/cck
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : c
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov
* Package name: drupal6-mod-filefield
Version : 3.7
Upstream Author : Nathan Haug (http://drupal.org/user/35821)
* URL : http://drupal.org/project/filefield
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: PHP
Descriptio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov
* Package name: drupal6-mod-imagefield-assist
Version : 1.0~beta3
Upstream Author : Lourenzo Ferreira (http://drupal.org/user/242102)
* URL : http://drupal.org/project/imagefield_assist
* License : GPL
Progr
* Cyril Brulebois , 2010-09-14, 12:00:
So this is to let you know, to remove this package in order to avoid
further problems :)
packages really ought to build if that package is installed…
Should these kind of bugs (FTBFS or producing broken packages in
non-clean environment) be considered R
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 14:55:33 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Cyril Brulebois , 2010-09-14, 12:00:
> >>So this is to let you know, to remove this package in order to
> >>avoid further problems :)
> >
> >packages really ought to build if that package is installed…
>
> Should these kind of bugs (FT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Two Japanese commercial font have been submitted to Android repository under
apache2 license now, so I want to put it into Debian as well.
Package name: ttf-motoya-l-c
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Two Japanese commercial font have been submitted to Android repository under
apache2 license now, so I want to put it into Debian as well.
Package name: ttf-motoya-l-m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov
* Package name: drupal6-mod-contemplate
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : James R Glasgow (http://drupal.org/user/36590)
* URL : http://drupal.org/project/contemplate
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: PHP
De
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:59:16AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 14, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> > pushing Debian towards adopting stronger RSA keys - We have accepted
> > some 2048R keys, but if you don't have a real reason to keep your key
> > at that size (i.e. you very often build on underpo
Peter Grasch writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Peter Grasch
>
>
> * Package name: simon
> Version : 0.3.0
> Upstream Author : Peter Grasch
> * URL : http://www.simon-listens.org/
> * License : GPL, BSD, GFDL and Julius
> Programming Lang
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, brian m. carlson wrote:
> Personally, I can't see a reason that using an RSA 4096 bit key should
> be that painful even on very slow machines. You're performing a *single
> RSA encrypt operation* per signature.
Well, the main key is mostly a key-signing key/KSK (although you
- Forwarded message from Samuel Thibault -
From: Samuel Thibault
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: ITP: mbrola-br1 -- Brazilian Portuguese male voice for Mbrola
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:50:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2010-09-1
Am 2010-09-14 19:17, schrieb Simon Josefsson:
Peter Grasch writes:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Grasch
* Package name: simon
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Peter Grasch
* URL : http://www.simon-listens.org/
* License : GPL, BSD, GFDL
Peter Grasch, le Tue 14 Sep 2010 22:22:42 +0200, a écrit :
> I haven't really thought about it but the license shouldn't be an issue
> afaik.
>
> This topic has come up multiple times already but have a look at theses
> discussions on why I think this should be ok:
> Comment section: http://lwn.
[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]
> Sounds reasonable. However sometimes package maintainer argueue that the
> policy says "clean build environment" and having package X intalled is
> no longer clean (thus I have a problem and buildds do not).
Where does the policy say that?
I can't find anything that
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Peter Grasch, le Tue 14 Sep 2010 22:22:42 +0200, a écrit :
>> I haven't really thought about it but the license shouldn't be an issue
>> afaik.
>>
>> This topic has come up multiple times already but have a look at theses
>> discussions on why I think this should be o
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 03:55:30PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> There is a thread about this now in the cryptography ML. If anything really
> insteresting shows up there, I will relay it here. I am certainly
> interested on our bias towards RSA and away from DSA2 and El-Gammal, for
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:56 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> I suspect that those figures are because 2048 bits is the default size
> for RSA keys and 4096 bits is the largest size that GnuPG supports.
> Some specially patched versions of PGP can support keys of up to 16384
> bits, but IIRC those a
* Goswin von Brederlow , 2010-09-11, 19:46:
Because you are a reportbug novice. Novices are not allowed to play
with severity of bugs. :)
I consider this a horrible misfeature of reportbug. Yes, we need RC bugs
from novices, too.
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Marco d'Itri (m...@linux.it):
> I would like to know the process which lead to selecting these figures.
Apparently, just like many other things in the project: the folks
doing the work (and appointed for this by the project through the DPL)
examine the situation, make plans and decisions
30 matches
Mail list logo
