Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ankur khurana
* Package name: sugar-sliderpuzzle-activity
Version : 8
Upstream Author : Carlos Neves
* URL : http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Slider_Puzzle
* License:
Files: ./SliderPuzzleActivity.py,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ankur khurana
* Package name: sugar-jigsawpuzzle-activity
Version : 8-1
Upstream Author : Carlos Neves
* URL : http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Jigsaw
* License : GPLv2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Sugar Ji
Dear Pabs:
Thanks very much for your kind.
The open source analysis website runs on free host space. So the storage and
the performance are limited, the website is also unstable. Would you still
kindly sponsor me a domain ( osa.debian.net) ?
I wish source.debian could be finished so
Hi!
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 10:48:44 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]
> > Since Debian-Policy 3.9.0 architecture wild cards are allowed so this
> > dependency would become
> > libudev-dev (>= 0.139) [linux-any]
> > and the type-handling aliases (which are hack according t
Hello, Daniel.
I've submitted bug 497206 for aptitude with a patch attached almost two
years ago. It's a new feature, to allow packages to be grouped by
source. It's usually easier to upgrade all packages from the same
source, without having to look for (and sometimes guess) what are the
other pa
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 617 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 140 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
Hi there,
I would like to suggest a new virtual package, "httpd-wsgi". I'm currently in
the process of packaging a Pylons-based web-application that uses wsgi and
instead of manually keeping / updating a list of all possible implementations
(eg. libapache2-mod-wsgi) it would be very nice if I (and
7 matches
Mail list logo
