On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:29 AM, JW Foster wrote:
> I just tried to do an upgrade on testing & I,m getting several errors.
> First snip of output is regarding unknown types. I have no idea what
> this is but I seen it before.
...
> Unknown media type in type 'chemical/x-alchemy'
...
Found via G
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:09:53 +0100
Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > 3/ some maintainers are too confident that nothing is going to break
>
> And even if they do tests, they cannot do them on all architectures.
With edos-debcheck you can. You simply need to download the relevant
Packages.gz file. edos
Stéphane Glondu writes:
> Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>> I don't an exhaustive answer but here are some points:
>> 1/ you can't request bin-nmus of reverse-dependencies in experimental
>>(to verify that all packages build fine with the updated package, and
>>that's one of the main task in pr
Cc'ing to -devel, as it is a more general problem and I'd like to hear
feedback from other fellow developers.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder"
Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder"
* Package name: libfusioninventory-agent-task-ocsdeploy-perl
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Gonéri Le Bouder
* URL : http://www.FusionInventory.org/
* License : GPLv2+
[Mike Hommey]
> There is a general problem with fuse, actually. fuse-utils is needed by
> any program using libfuse and allowing users (i.e not root) to mount a
> filesystem: In this case, libfuse uses fusemount to do the mount, since
> mount(2) is unfortunately a CAP_SYS_ADMIN syscall, and fusemo
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:28:58PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Again from Wouter's comments:
> "It is of course perfectly fine for dpkg-source to error out if it
> detects that things are not completely in order, or if it detects that
> features were requested that are not supported with the sour
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:11:12PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > You mean like the existing pages on buildd.debian.org? You just need to
> > feed them the list of affected packages to get that.
>
> Good if it can be done with a simple link t
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:37:59PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Neil Williams schrieb:
>
> >Wouldn't a simpler method be to identify uploads that inadvertently
> >impair an ongoing transition and bump that one upload to experimental
> >or simply tell the DD not to upload to u
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 09:25:38AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Now all I need is for dpkg to accept that the absence of
> > debian/source/format is declarative of source format 1.0.
> That's the case _for now_.
> > packages don't need to be chan
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If what you care about is the format used by *new* packages, I think you
> should focus on making sure the templates maintainers are using (such as
> dh-make) set the desired default explicitly. That would have an *immediate*
> payoff...
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Landaeta
* Package name: mojarra
Version : 2.0.2
Upstream Author : Sun Microsystems Inc.
* URL : https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/
* License : GPL2+, CDDL-1.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : JavaSe
12 matches
Mail list logo
