Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
>> From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32
>
> This is not very good, since .32 is skipped by -rt people, so us who need
> realtime kernel, won't be able just to add a patch to distribution
> kernel, but instead will have to use different u
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Borodaenko
* Package name: syncache
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Dmitry Borodaenko
* URL : http://samizdat.nongnu.org/
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Thread-safe time-limited ca
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Borodaenko
* Package name: graffiti
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Dmitry Borodaenko
* URL : http://samizdat.nongnu.org/
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Relational RDF store for Ru
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Borodaenko
* Package name: whitewash
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Dmitry Borodaenko
* URL : http://samizdat.nongnu.org/
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Whitelist-based HTML filte
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lubos Novak
* Package name: libisds
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Petr Pisar
* URL : http://xpisar.wz.cz/libisds/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C
Description : Library for accessing the Czech Data Boxe
Happy New Years!
www.FloorGuardian.com
January 2010
�
We protect your floors while the others just cover it! We offer floor
protection.� You have in
Hello,
Le dimanche 14 mars 2010 à 21:42 +0100, Philipp Kern a écrit :
> Dear fellow developers,
>
>
> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze whi
On 03/15/2010 12:32 AM, Ghe Rivero wrote:
> I'll take a look to it this morning. Anyway, there is a new upstream
> on the way , so maybe it will take a litle more of time to fix and mix
> everything together.
>
> Ghe Rivero
>
If you can get me a backport of 1.5 to lenny I'll test it on my system
Hello,
it's since 2007 that cache for dpkg has been proposed but maintainers never
replied. For this reason I've written a shared library libtdpkg.so to wrap
open/fstat/rename/unlink calls from dpkg for .list files in order to cache the
contents of those
files. The result is quite impressive on ho
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:55:19PM +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
> Hello,
> it's since 2007 that cache for dpkg has been proposed but maintainers never
> replied. For this reason I've written a shared library libtdpkg.so to wrap
> open/fstat/rename/unlink calls from dpkg for .list files in order to cach
Hi, there're still packages up for adoption and a request for help. It
would be nice if these packages, for some newer upstream versions are
available, find a better home.
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 07:54:35AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Hi, I'm looking for new maintainers for
>
> bglibs -- BG Lib
Hi,
kudos to Jonathan Nieder, who did and still does a great load of work on
the Debian git-core package and its bug reports in the Debian BTS.
I find myself to have from time to time less spare time and/or
motivation than some of the packages I maintain deserve.
With Jonathan co-working on Debi
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> You should try the last version of dpkg in experimental, which improved
> the way the .list files are read. (Also note this could be (slightly)
> improved further).
Thanks a lot for working on that! Yes dpkg from experimental is way fa
Hi all,
in bug #433462 there is a request to add free space information in
reportbug standard info appended to bug report.
It's a valid request, that I want to fulfill, but there are some
aspects I'd like to discuss.
First of all, with your package maintainers hat on, what kind of
information you
There's a release candidate for ICU 4.4 in experimental. If you
maintain a package that depends on ICU, it would be great if you could
test with this version. There should be no changes required to your
package -- just install libicu-dev from experimental and rebuild. If I
don't hear any proble
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:02:22PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> and having Essential in the Packages file makes it harder than it
> could be to avoid Essential if the list was in /etc.
If the list is in /etc, an ignorant user may modify the list (remember,
/etc is system-local!) and break th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: mike castleman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: librack-test-ruby
Version : 0.5.3
Upstream Author : Bryan Helmkamp
* URL : http://github.com/brynary/rack-test/
* License : MIT
Programming
Op Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:28:38 -0500
schreef Michael Gilbert :
> Does anyone know who maintains source.debian.net? It's a really great
> service, but its been down for about a month now. I would like to
> to make sure they're aware of the problem. Thanks.
I unfortunately can no longer host the s
hi,
> That said, what to report? Simply taking the output of "df -h" and
> attaching to reportbug template it's not what I like: there could be
> more partitions/disks not interesting for the report/system in that
> output, and I don't want to include them.
I think you don't have any chance. What
19 matches
Mail list logo
