On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It does require virtualisation extensions, but most x86 processors sold in
> the last few years have them.
My SE Linux Play Machine is currently running on a P3-800 system with 256M of
RAM. I would like to continue running on that hardware until someon
* Marco d'Itri [091230 10:37]:
> On Dec 30, "Bernhard R. Link" wrote:
>
> > > > I routinely blacklist the ipv6 module. There are far too many
> > > > programs breaking or doing stuff I do not want if it is loaded.
> I call bullshit on this.
You can call bullshit whatever how often you want. That
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:55:27 +1100, Brian May
wrote:
>Like I said previously, I think dropping Xen support is a mistake because KVM
>requires QEMU and QEMU seems to have a reputation of being insecure.
Xen is unsupportable due to clueless upstream, who has been in a
constant FAIL state regarding s
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:21:55AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I believe we will have Xen hypervisor and Linux dom0 packages,
The hypervisor works well, but the Linux Dom0 packages are not available
yet, upstream is again fading behind.
Bastian
--
What kind of love is that? Not to be loved;
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 04:55:27PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:21:55AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I believe we will have Xen hypervisor and Linux dom0 packages, but they
> > will not be supported to the degree that ordinary kernel packages are.
> I can't see any Xen ke
Florian Weimer writes:
> Have you got any suggestions for increasing productivity with proper
> IDE support for medium-sized C and C++ code bases?
>
> I've got a hunch that proper browsing support (searching for
> definitions/references, displaying static call trees) might help me to
> navigate un
Brian May writes:
> http://blog.orebokech.com/2007/05/xen-security-or-lack-thereof.html links to
> http://taviso.decsystem.org/virtsec.pdf.
> I don't know for certain this applies to KVM, however I would assume so.
Only to a certain extent. Nowadays Linux guests in KVM use virtio
for disk/netwo
On Jan 03, "Bernhard R. Link" wrote:
> You can call bullshit whatever how often you want. That does not change
> that many people have had those problems and thus have ipv6 backlisted
> (or not even compiled in if they have their own kernels built) and
> programs not working with that are broken.
Brian May, le Sun 03 Jan 2010 16:48:06 +1100, a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:47:54PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Brian May wrote:
> >
> > > 1) I believe Xen, with paravirtualization (that is without QEMU) is more
> > > secure
> > > then KVM (or Xen) with Q
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:46:38AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:55:27 +1100, Brian May
> wrote:
> >Like I said previously, I think dropping Xen support is a mistake because KVM
> >requires QEMU and QEMU seems to have a reputation of being insecure.
>
> Xen is unsupportable due
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pkg-e-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: enna
Version: 0.4.0
Upstream Author: The Enna Project
URL: http://enna.geexbox.org
License: LGPL
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:23:28AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:21:55AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I believe we will have Xen hypervisor and Linux dom0 packages,
>
> The hypervisor works well, but the Linux Dom0 packages are not available
> yet, upstream is again f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ernesto Hernández-Novich (USB)"
* Package name: libtemplate-plugin-number-format-perl
Version : 1.02
Upstream Author : Darren Chamberlain
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Template-Plugin-Number-Format/
* License : G
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:31:20PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> So the change has happened, lthough it took painfully long to get the
> upstream Linux pv_ops framework in shape and all that.. and obviously
> the pv_ops dom0 patches still need to get merged upstream.
That was opposed quite stro
Hi all,
I'm sorry to bring this topic up again, but what is the status of Python
2.6 and Squeeze? I wrote a mail to doko on 2009-12-13 asking him what
his plans are and if he needs help but didn't receive an answer yet. Has
anyone more information?
Cheers and happy new year,
Bastian
--
Basti
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:33:07PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:31:20PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > So the change has happened, lthough it took painfully long to get the
> > upstream Linux pv_ops framework in shape and all that.. and obviously
> > the pv_ops dom0
- "Marc Haber" wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:55:27 +1100, Brian May
> wrote:
> >Like I said previously, I think dropping Xen support is a mistake
> because KVM
> >requires QEMU and QEMU seems to have a reputation of being insecure.
>
> Xen is unsupportable due to clueless upstream, who ha
Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm sorry to bring this topic up again, but what is the status of Python
> 2.6 and Squeeze? I wrote a mail to doko on 2009-12-13 asking him what
> his plans are and if he needs help but didn't receive an answer yet. Has
> anyone more information?
python 2.6 wi
- "Gabor Gombas" wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:31:20PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > So the change has happened, lthough it took painfully long to get
> the
> > upstream Linux pv_ops framework in shape and all that.. and
> obviously
> > the pv_ops dom0 patches still need to get
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:47:54PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Brian May wrote:
>
> > 1) I believe Xen, with paravirtualization (that is without QEMU) is more
> > secure
> > then KVM (or Xen) with QEMU.
>
> I haven't heard this claim before, do you have any referen
On måndagen den 7 december 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 01:17:30PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > But how do you fix a package to do what its supposed to do,
> > when it isn't installed anymore?
>
> You don't need to. When the package is purged, and ucf doesn't exis
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 08:01:10PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I'm sorry to bring this topic up again, but what is the status of Python
> 2.6 and Squeeze? I wrote a mail to doko on 2009-12-13 asking him what
> his plans are and if he needs help but didn't receive an answer yet. Has
> anyone mor
On Sun, Jan 03 2010, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On måndagen den 7 december 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 01:17:30PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
>> > But how do you fix a package to do what its supposed to do,
>> > when it isn't installed anymore?
>>
>> You don't need
On Sun, Jan 03 2010, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On måndagen den 7 december 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 01:17:30PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
>> > But how do you fix a package to do what its supposed to do,
>> > when it isn't installed anymore?
>>
>> You don't need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 561962 wontfix
Bug #561962 {Done: Holger Levsen } [general] general: On
desktop enviroments open .deb files with "gksu gdebi-gtk" by default
Added tag(s) wontfix.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 561966 wontfix
Bug #561966 {Done: Holger Levsen } [general] general:
Centralized configuration for the hinting style and dpi
Added tag(s) wontfix.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 561961 wontfix
Bug #561961 {Done: Holger Levsen } [general] general:
add a language-selector like ubuntu
Added tag(s) wontfix.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ernesto Hernández-Novich (USB)"
* Package name: libtemplate-plugin-clickable-email-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Nik Clayton
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Template-Plugin-Clickable-Email/
* License : BSD
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:10:41AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > > a) netstat garbling the addresses of connected endpoints
> > This is one of the reasons why bindv6only should be set.
>
> I'm not arguing about bindv6only. I'm only arguing programs should work
> without ipv6 loaded.
Somewhe
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 04:55:27PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:21:55AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I believe we will have Xen hypervisor and Linux dom0 packages, but they
> > > will not be supported to
Brian May writes:
> In that case, how can correct programs be broken if IPv6 is not
> supported? Surely it is just a matter of binding to IPv4 and ignoring
> the error that occurs when trying to bind to the IPv6 socket (or vice
> versa if IPv6 is supported but not IPv4)?
I don't believe that co
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:49:24PM +0300, William Pitcock wrote:
> > Xen is unsupportable due to clueless upstream, who has been in a
> > constant FAIL state regarding support of current kernels for years.
>
> Do you have any proof for this claim? xen.git seems pretty up to date to
> me (2.6.31.6
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:12:28PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> If we're talking about Linux 2.6.32 support for pv_ops dom0 here, then that's
> in progress, see:
>
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-12/msg01127.html
>
> the 2.6.32 tree should be available shortly after J
On Jan 04, Brian May wrote:
> Somewhere I got lost in this discussion.
You did not, he did.
> In that case, how can correct programs be broken if IPv6 is not supported?
> Surely it is just a matter of binding to IPv4 and ignoring the error that
> occurs when trying to bind to the IPv6 socket (or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexander Gerasiov
* Package name: wordpress-xrds-simple
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : DiSo Development Team http://diso-project.org/
* URL : http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/xrds-simple/
* License : Expat
Programm
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 10:38 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:49:24PM +0300, William Pitcock wrote:
> > > Xen is unsupportable due to clueless upstream, who has been in a
> > > constant FAIL state regarding support of current kernels for years.
> >
> > Do you have any proof for
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 11:02:51AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:12:28PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > If we're talking about Linux 2.6.32 support for pv_ops dom0 here, then
> > that's
> > in progress, see:
> >
> > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009
37 matches
Mail list logo
