Re: -fPIC, libraries, and overriding a lintian error

2009-11-25 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-11-25, Roberto C Sánchez wrote: > > --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:43:12PM -0500, Roberto C. S=E1nchez wrote: >>=20 >> Does that mean that I am per

Re: relocation error: ABI change?

2009-11-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:27:06PM -0800, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: > Hi, > If you see en error message like this one (from [1]): > > qutecom: relocation error: /usr/lib/qutecom/libphapi.so: symbol > CRYPTO_malloc_debug_init, version OPENSSL_0.9.8 not defined in file > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 with link t

Bug#558028: ITP: Shared-desktop-ontologies -- shared ontologies for file indexers

2009-11-25 Thread Sune Vuorela
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sune Vuorela * Package name: Shared-desktop-ontologies Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Sebastian Trueg and others * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/oscaf/files/ * License : BSD & cc-by 3.0 Programming Lang: data

Re: New source package formats now available

2009-11-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:17:17AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > > I can add a new option "--no-debian-patch" that would refuse to create the > automatic quilt patch debian-changes- and make it fail instead if > there are upstream changes. Hi Raphaël, even simpler, an option or a format tha

Re: New source package formats now available

2009-11-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Joey Hess wrote: >>> I understand that you do not want to throw away your work on this >>> patch management system, but by making it optional, I think that you >>> will actually increase your chances of success… >> I think that's very wise. > It is

Re: -fPIC, libraries, and overriding a lintian error

2009-11-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Roberto C. Sánchez writes: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:43:12PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >> Does that mean that I am permitted to override the lintian error? > Please disregard. It turns out that the proposed fix causes a FTBFS on > amd64, which is not acceptable. Overriding the lintia

Pls add me

2009-11-25 Thread Simmi
Hi GM Dosto ADD me for link exchng... Thanks