Hi.
Le samedi 21 novembre 2009 à 16:54 +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> We have collected some question/answers from early adopters in
> the dedicated wiki page, the most important information is pasted
> below. We hope you will find it helpful to convert your own packages.
> http:/
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Maybe that's very explicit for eveyone, but I couldn't find any
> explenation for regular humans of what "quilt" is (ok, I think I have a
> clue, but remember not all newcomers may be familiar with it for
> instance), and then what the difference ar
Hi,
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:51:51PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Currently a package without a patch system needs heavy modifications in
> > debian/rules to setup the patch system. So when you want to add a patch in
> > debian/patches and not in th
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:48:14AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Because you want the patch to be clearly identified and to carry its
> meta-information. Or because maybe you're applying 2 separate patches in
> the same NMU upload.
"Fixing cosmetic issues or changing the packaging style in NMUs
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.5.2
Severity: wishlist
It has been suggested on IRC that having dpkg-source switch back to
native mode if it can't find the .orig tarball was probably a bad idea
from the beginning and that it tends to confuse people. However,
with the addition of new formats, I gen
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:48:14AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Because you want the patch to be clearly identified and to carry its
> > meta-information. Or because maybe you're applying 2 separate patches in
> > the same NMU upload.
>
> "Fixing cosm
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 01:22:46AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Mike Hommey
>
> | On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:33:29PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> | > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:23 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> | > > Ack. People which use computers which did not came with a DVD reader
Le Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:51:51PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> Currently a package without a patch system needs heavy modifications in
> debian/rules to setup the patch system. So when you want to add a patch in
> debian/patches and not in the .diff.gz, you have to choose a patch system
>
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Also, as a side comment, I would like to add that the “NMU workflow” often
> advertised on this list completely ignores that a large number of packages are
> stored in a VCS where all DDs have write acceess. Uploading a package with an
> anonymous and mo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Pkg-e Team
* Package name: python-elementary
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Simon Busch
* URL : http://www.enlightenment.org
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python bindings for th
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > My point is : dpkg-source -x should be idempotent, whatever other
> > packages are installed when you do it. The fact that you can't
> > dpkg-source -x, and *then* install quilt to manage the patches is a
> >
Actually, it is known that some utilities are not POSIX-compliant, and
will probably never be. At the same time, I believe that even though
some of the packages aren't POSIX-compliant, having a POSIX-like
environment can be useful. The point therefore is not to have a
POSIX-compliant system, but me
Package: wnpp
Owner: Youhei SASAKI
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rail
Version : 1.2.6
Upstream Author : Mitsunobu Shimada
* URL or Web page : http://ring.riken.jp/archives/elisp/rail/
* License : GPL
Description : Replace Agent-string Internal Library
1. comp
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:30:45AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:48:14AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Because you want the patch to be clearly identified and to carry its
> > > meta-information. Or because maybe you're
Hi
I've just met an uninstallable package with 3-week-old RC bug, caused by
soname change of one of dependences. This bug could be fixed by a simple
rebuild - I've checked if package builds against today's sid - yes it
does.
I've never done an NMU before, but this looks like a case to try :)
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Hi
Hi
> I've just met an uninstallable package with 3-week-old RC bug, caused by
> soname change of one of dependences. This bug could be fixed by a simple
> rebuild - I've checked if package builds against today's sid - yes it
> does.
>
> I've never done an NMU
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:14:29PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> You are member of the technical comittee, which means that I should trust
> your experience. I want you and this list to understand that I take your
> advice to orphan my packages very seriously.
Well, that's unfortunate, because M
Hi,
When a new upstream version is released, I have to check all patches if
they were accepted by upstream or not. I have to check each patch if I
can drop it. It would make packaging new releases easier if there were
an optional Applied-Upstream field. Every patch that was applied
upstream can be
On Sun, Nov 22 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:14:29PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> You are member of the technical comittee, which means that I should trust
>> your experience. I want you and this list to understand that I take your
>> advice to orphan my packages ver
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:46:59PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Brian May , 2009-11-17, 12:30:
> [...]
> > WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
> > This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
> > install-info (due to sed)
> > 0 upgraded, 0 new
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 02:27:46PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> install-info is only needed to create /usr/share/info/dir and the package
> using that file should depend on install-info. install-info must not be
> installed on all systems but only on systems that have an info-browser
> installed
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:54:36PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> You need to put "3.0 (quilt)" or "3.0 (native)" in debian/source/format to
> indicate the desired format to dpkg-source (see the dpkg-source(1) manual
> page for more information).
Am I doing something wrong?
sys11:/home/brian/tre
Tratamiento 100% natural para el control de la diabetes y la eliminación de las
neuropatías.
Tratamiento de 4 meses y en dosis de 2 cápsulas en cada comida. , el
tratamiento 4 de 1000 pesos ya incluye el envió.
El neem funciona en pacientes diabéticos con altos niveles de glucosa , lo que
Tratamiento para cuerpo completo
El tratamiento es realmente muy efectivo y tenemos tasas de éxito en el 90% de
los casos los cuales fueron pacientes muy complicados.
No existe efecto secundario además de obtener una re pigmentación total.
Lea la información de Neem así como el costo del
Tratamiento Natural contra el Cáncer
Este es el tratamiento mas solicitado para el caso de pacientes con Cáncer
Uso de este Tratamiento 2 Cáncer
Ningún efecto secundario. Este tratamiento es para pacientes con cáncer
El Tratamiento esta indicado para todo tipo de Cáncer
De que consta el Trat
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Brian May wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 02:27:46PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > install-info is only needed to create /usr/share/info/dir and the package
> > using that file should depend on install-info. install-info must not be
> > installed on all systems but only on
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> When a new upstream version is released, I have to check all patches if
> they were accepted by upstream or not. I have to check each patch if I
> can drop it. It would make packaging new releases easier if there were
> an optional Applied-Upstream
27 matches
Mail list logo
