Bug#557196: ITP: r-cran-epicalc -- GNU R Epidemiological calculator

2009-11-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: r-cran-epicalc Version : 2.10.0.0 Upstream Author : Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong * URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/epicalc * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: R Description

Bug#557199: ITP: r-cran-epir -- GNU R Functions for analysing epidemiological data

2009-11-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: r-cran-epir Version : 0.9-19 Upstream Author : Mark Stevenson * URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/epiR * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: R Description : GNU R Function

Bug#557200: ITP: r-cran-medadherence -- GNU R Medication Adherence: Commonly Used Definitions

2009-11-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: r-cran-medadherence Version : 1.01 Upstream Author : Xiangyang Ye * URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/medAdherence/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: R Description : GN

Re: Package formats and software distribution on Linux

2009-11-20 Thread Roland Mas
Eugene Gorodinsky, 2009-11-20 02:01:19 +0200 : > There is a sort of oligopoly in linux because of package management. > There are several main distros which have a lot of package maintainers > and a lot of packages as a result of this. Smaller distros need to > choose between compatibility with ex

Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error

2009-11-20 Thread Li, Yan
Dear List, I'm facing an issue when packaging the Anjal [1] mail client for Debian. Anjal is another GUI front-end for Evolution designed for small form factor devices. So naturally Anjal depends upon many .so libraries in the Evolution package. But those .so libraries is considered private by Ev

Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error

2009-11-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 04:17:57PM +0800, Li, Yan wrote: > Dear List, > > I'm facing an issue when packaging the Anjal [1] mail client for > Debian. > > Anjal is another GUI front-end for Evolution designed for small form > factor devices. So naturally Anjal depends upon many .so libraries in > t

Bug#557202: ITP: r-cran-diagnosismed -- GNU R Diagnostic test accuracy evaluation for medical professionals

2009-11-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: r-cran-diagnosismed Version : 0.2.2.2 Upstream Author : Pedro Brasil * URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DiagnosisMed * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: R Description :

Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error

2009-11-20 Thread Li, Yan
Mike: > Why not put a lintian override ? Your explanation sounds like a good > reason to me. Thank you. I'm contacting Lintian maintainers. -- Li, Yan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

Re: Anjal package needs RPATH, which is considered an error

2009-11-20 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Li, Yan schrieb: > Mike: >> Why not put a lintian override ? Your explanation sounds like a good >> reason to me. > > Thank you. I'm contacting Lintian maintainers. You have to set and install your own lintian overrides in your package in the .lintia

Some questions on format "3.0 (quilt)" multi-origin

2009-11-20 Thread Marco Nenciarini
Hi, I'm working on switching dovecot package to format "3.0 (quilt)" and I wish to use the multi-origin option, because it comes as three source tar.gz [1][2][3] plus a patch [4]. I've done the initial switch [5] and it works quite well, but i have some general questions: 1) Dovecot is mai

Re: Some questions on format "3.0 (quilt)" multi-origin

2009-11-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote: > 3) When a new version of a component is released, how to handle it in > the new source format? I can't find any standard place where to put meta > informations regarding extra origin tarball. I don't think there exist one

Mahesh Rathore has invited you to create a Plurk.com account

2009-11-20 Thread Plurk
I have been using Plurk and I think you should check it out! Accept my invitation by going to: http://www.plurk.com/eworldtradefair/invite/2 Check out my profile at: http://www.plurk.com/eworldtradefair Plurk.com - Your life, on the line -- If you don't wish to receive e

Ridiculously large packages

2009-11-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
Umm... Package: nexuiz-data Priority: optional Section: games Installed-Size: 782252 Maintainer: Debian Games Team Architecture: all Version: 2.5.2-1 Recommends: nexuiz (>= 2.5.2) | nexuiz-server (>= 2.5.2) Suggests: nexuiz-music (>= 2.5.2) Conflicts: nexuiz (<< 2.5.2), nexuiz-server (<< 2.5.2) F

Re: Ridiculously large packages

2009-11-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Steve McIntyre (20/11/2009): > If you ever want this to be available on Debian CDs, you're going to > have to do something about the size. For now, I'm going to blacklist > this package altogether. And you didn't see Urban Terror and its 700+ MB yet! Speaking of which, what's the status of data.d

Re: Ridiculously large packages

2009-11-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (20/11/2009): > And you didn't see Urban Terror and its 700+ MB yet! Speaking of > which, what's the status of data.debian.org? IIRC, it's been in the > pipe for 2+ years at the very least (was already mentioned during > DC'07). :) OOH. http://ftp-master.debian.org/wiki/projects/d

Re: Bits from the FTPMaster meeting

2009-11-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 15.11.2009 16:15, schrieb Joerg Jaspert: > multiple outstanding and intrusive patches got merged. We also discussed > various outstanding topics, a few of which we can report about already, > a few others where we still have to gather more information. This > process, either asking our lawyers o

Re: Some questions on format "3.0 (quilt)" multi-origin

2009-11-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote: > 2) Talking of an hypothetic VCS-buildpackage using pristine-tar or > similar tools, how it can known which component tarball need it to > extract to create the right build environment? May be we should > define a standard place und

nexuiz-data does not fit on a single CD

2009-11-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Package: nexuiz-data Version: 2.5.2-1 Severity: serious Any reason for not reporting this as a proper bug? Doing that with this post. On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:36:10AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Umm... > > Package: nexuiz-data > Installed-Size: 782252 Dear maintainer, the Debian CD team

Re: nexuiz-data does not fit on a single CD

2009-11-20 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:00 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > the Debian CD team (in the person of Steve McIntyre) has noted the > enormous size of nexuiz-data, which means the package won't fit on a > single CD. I'm setting severity serious because this de facto means the > package cannot be di

Re: nexuiz-data does not fit on a single CD

2009-11-20 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:59:07 -0200 Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:00 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > This is silly. I haven't seen bug reports about packages not fitting in > diskettes, and it would not make any sense if they were filed! =). I thought this was why we h

Re: nexuiz-data does not fit on a single CD

2009-11-20 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:00 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> the Debian CD team (in the person of Steve McIntyre) has noted the >> enormous size of nexuiz-data, which means the package won't fit on a >> single CD. I'm setting severity serious because this de fact

Re: nexuiz-data does not fit on a single CD

2009-11-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
severity 557218 important thanks On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:59:07AM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:00 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > the Debian CD team (in the person of Steve McIntyre) has noted the > > enormous size of nexuiz-data, which means the package

Re: Some questions on format "3.0 (quilt)" multi-origin

2009-11-20 Thread Ryan Niebur
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote: > > Hi, > I'm working on switching dovecot package to format "3.0 (quilt)" and I > wish to use the multi-origin option, because it comes as three source > tar.gz [1][2][3] plus a patch [4]. > > I've done the initial switch [5] an

Re: nexuiz-data does not fit on a single CD

2009-11-20 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2009-11-20, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Personally I completely agree with what you said, CD (at least as a > medium to get the whole of Debian) are the past and I couldn't care less > about supporting them. That, in my eyes, does not solve our problem of > deciding whether we want to support t

Re: Ridiculously large packages

2009-11-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 20 November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote: > If you ever want this to be available on Debian CDs, you're going to > have to do something about the size. For now, I'm going to blacklist > this package altogether. Even though they do technically still fit on a CD, you may want to consider ex

Re: Package formats and software distribution on Linux

2009-11-20 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Eugene Gorodinsky | However I'm not proposing to have a single true package format for all | distributions. Rather my idea is to have a distribution-specific | package format for packages that are distribution-specific, and a | universal package format for packages that aren't specific. Isn't

Re: common, FHS-compliant, default document root for the various web servers

2009-11-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Heya, sorry for the delay. On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:15:56PM +0100, sean finney wrote: > > Inherently, such a proposal applies to static content, not CGI > > applications. I fail to see where lay problems about unconfigured static > > content. > > read-only static content unpacked from packages

Re: nexuiz-data does not fit on a single CD

2009-11-20 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:23 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Ack. People which use computers which did not came with a DVD reader built in > are probably not able to play nexuiz anyway as it needs a pretty fastCPU and > graphics card to be fun :) Well, you see, my current computer (Lenovo x200s) does

Re: nexuiz-data does not fit on a single CD

2009-11-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:33:29PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:23 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > Ack. People which use computers which did not came with a DVD reader built > > in > > are probably not able to play nexuiz anyway as it needs a pretty fastCPU and >

Re: Ridiculously large packages

2009-11-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 20 November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote: > For now, I've added a cutoff of 300,000,000 bytes as a maximum package > size for adding to CDs. That means that the following 3 packages will > be dropped from the squeeze CD builds: > > 306308472 pool/main/o/openarena-data/openarena-data_0.8.1-

Re: Ridiculously large packages

2009-11-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 04:21:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >On Friday 20 November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> If you ever want this to be available on Debian CDs, you're going to >> have to do something about the size. For now, I'm going to blacklist >> this package altogether. > >Even though th

Re: nexuiz-data does not fit on a single CD

2009-11-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:00:18PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >Package: nexuiz-data >Version: 2.5.2-1 >Severity: serious > >Any reason for not reporting this as a proper bug? Doing that with this >post. True, should have done that too. Thanks. :-) -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.

Re: nexuiz-data does not fit on a single CD

2009-11-20 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 16:47 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > It surely is a bug for those who care about CDs. But Zack's point is: > should it be RC, normal, minor, or wontfix ? minor =) -- Gustavo Noronha Silva Debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Re: Ridiculously large packages

2009-11-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 05:01:07PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >On Friday 20 November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> For now, I've added a cutoff of 300,000,000 bytes as a maximum package >> size for adding to CDs. That means that the following 3 packages will >> be dropped from the squeeze CD builds:

Re: Ridiculously large packages

2009-11-20 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 20 November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> If you ever want this to be available on Debian CDs, you're going to >> have to do something about the size. For now, I'm going to blacklist >> this package altogether. > > Even though they do

Bug#557245: large packages dropped from CDs

2009-11-20 Thread Holger Levsen
package: release-notes x-debbugs-cc: debian...@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org On Freitag, 20. November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote: > For now, I've added a cutoff of 300,000,000 bytes as a maximum package > size for adding to CDs. That means that the following 3 packages will > be

Re: Ridiculously large packages

2009-11-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 04:18:54PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 05:01:07PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >>On Friday 20 November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>> For now, I've added a cutoff of 300,000,000 bytes as a maximum package >>> size for adding to CDs. That means that the

Re: ITP: mercurial-buildpackage (for those who care about Mercurial)

2009-11-20 Thread Jens Peter Secher
2009/11/19 Goswin von Brederlow : > Jens Peter Secher writes: [...] >>  * Support dpkg source format 3.0. > > Integration of the hg stacked patches extenstion (don't remember the > name, the one giving you qpull/qpush) with 3.0 (quilt) format? As I see it, there is no need for using Mercurial Que

leftover /usr/X11R6 references

2009-11-20 Thread Joey Hess
/usr/X11R6 is gone but code trying to use it lives on. Today I noticed gnome-settings-daemon doing this every 2 seconds for an unknown reason that I have not yet tracked down: inotify_add_watch(20, "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11", IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_D

Re: leftover /usr/X11R6 references

2009-11-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 20 novembre 2009 à 17:41 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit : > /usr/X11R6 is gone but code trying to use it lives on. > > Today I noticed gnome-settings-daemon doing this every 2 seconds for an > unknown > reason that I have not yet tracked down: > > inotify_add_watch(20, "/usr/X11R6/lib/X1

Re: leftover /usr/X11R6 references

2009-11-20 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: libxcursor1 Version: 1:1.1.9-1 On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 17:41:32 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > /usr/X11R6 is gone but code trying to use it lives on. > [...] > Binary file libXaw.so.7 matches > Binary file libXaw7.so.7 matches > Binary file libXaw7.so.7.0.0 matches http://cgit.freedesktop

Re: Ridiculously large packages

2009-11-20 Thread Paul Wise
[dropping debian-cd for this subthread] On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Cyril Brulebois (20/11/2009): >> And you didn't see Urban Terror and its 700+ MB yet! Speaking of >> which, what's the status of data.debian.org? IIRC, it's been in the >> pipe for 2+ years at the v

Re: ITP: mercurial-buildpackage (for those who care about Mercurial)

2009-11-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jens Peter Secher writes: > 2009/11/19 Goswin von Brederlow : >> Jens Peter Secher writes: > [...] >>>  * Support dpkg source format 3.0. >> >> Integration of the hg stacked patches extenstion (don't remember the >> name, the one giving you qpull/qpush) with 3.0 (quilt) format? > > As I see it,

Re: leftover /usr/X11R6 references

2009-11-20 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:41:32 -0500 Joey Hess napsal(a): > Binary file librpm.so.0 matches > Binary file librpm.so.0.0.0 matches lib/psm.c:static const char * const SCRIPT_PATH = "PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin"; I don't think it causes any harm. > There are probably mo

Re: Bits from the FTPMaster meeting

2009-11-20 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 22:22:52 +, Neil Williams wrote: > On Sun, 15, Nov, 2009 at 02:37:56PM -0500, Joey Hess spoke thus.. > > Note that debootstrap does not support data.tar.bz2. > > debootstrap-1.0.20/functions: extract > > progress "$p" "$#" EXTRACTPKGS "Extracting packa

Re: possible MBF about Policy 8.2 (Shared library support files)

2009-11-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:41:11AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> I detected 1063 possible violations with some percentage of false > >> positives. Since those are too many to go through by hand I filtered a > >> bit for the location of the violating files: > >> /etc/ : 137

Bug#557303: ITP: libmoosex-role-withoverloading-perl -- Moose extension for roles that support overloading

2009-11-20 Thread Jonathan Yu
Package: wnpp Owner: Jonathan Yu Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libmoosex-role-withoverloading-perl Version : 0.03 Upstream Author : Florian Ragwitz * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX