Re: Automatic Debug Packages

2009-08-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sonntag, 9. August 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > The link to the wiki page was missing > http://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages this link was also missing in #508585. regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: piuparts-MBF: overwriting other packages files

2009-08-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Samstag, 8. August 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > So am I correct in my assumption that only file conflicts with > packages installed on the once-clean chroot would be detected by the > test? Or am I missing something? Yes. for the rest there is edos.debian.net :) > > Yes, the

Re: Automatic Debug Packages

2009-08-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I proposed [1] a GSoC project this spring which was accepted, and I'm thus > working on getting automatic debug packages into Debian. BTW, it would be nice if debug.debian.net were to continue to exist, but contain binaries and thei

Bug#540701: ITP: wbarconf -- graphical configuration utility for wbar

2009-08-09 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Krzysztof Burghardt * Package name: wbarconf Version : 0.7.2 Upstream Author : Mika Hynnä * URL : http://www.ihku.biz/wbarconf/ * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: Python Description : graphical configuration uti

Re: Non-unified patches and dpkg source format ‘3.0 (quilt)’.

2009-08-09 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:12:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:45:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > >> Le Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:26:02AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : > >> > > >> > (filterdiff comes with patchutils.) Given that, this s

Re: Bug#540365: ITP: turnin-ng -- Assignment submitter and manager

2009-08-09 Thread Ryan Kavanagh
(Sorry, resending, I forgot to CC the bug and the list) On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 05:23:43PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > I hope the packages uploaded won't have a «project» binary in the > PATH? Hi Guillem, At the moment yes, Turnin-NG provides /usr/bin/project since that's what the origina

Re: Automatic Debug Packages

2009-08-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 08:33:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 08 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> I've documented the .ddeb format in the wiki page [1] ("DDeb Format", > >>> which is short since the format is basically that of .debs). Do we

Re: Automatic Debug Packages

2009-08-09 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek writes: > I don't have a strong opinion on whether ddebs should be documented in > policy, but I certainly don't agree with requiring dpkg to understand > them as a prerequisite for implementing a general purpose, public > archive for auto-stripped debugging symbols packages. Ther

Re: Automatic Debug Packages

2009-08-09 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Aug 09 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 08:33:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> > Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 08 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> >>> I've documented the .ddeb format in the wiki page [1] ("DDeb Format", >> >>> which is short si

Debian packaging license (was: Re: RFC: DEP-3: Patch Tagging Guidelines).

2009-08-09 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:33:58AM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > The dh_make template for debian/copyright induces many developers to put > > their > > packaging work under the GPL, and I have already seen packages whose > > license is