On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 07:47:25PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> However, I realised that the Ultimate Debian Database, which I thought would
> be
> a nice place to host the data, works on a retreiving model rather than a
> pushing model. Before elaborating a complex workaround involving an
> int
Christian Meder writes:
[...]
> Now life has slowed down a bit and I intend to return to my aegis
> duties. Thank you for preparing the updated Debian package I'll check it
> and upload it afterwards.
I've just uploaded the package for 4.24.2 on
http://aegis.stepbuild.org/debian/aegis
it now
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
* Package name: pdfmod
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Gabriel Burt
* URL : http://live.gnome.org/pdfmod
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C#
Description : simple tool for modifying PDF documen
Hi,
as announced at DebConf9 I'll now (slowly) start threads about different bug
categories detected by piuparts, with the aim to agree on mass filing bugs
with the correct severity.
Having a piuparts clean archive is again a release goal for squeeze, currently
http://piuparts.debian.org/squee
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 16:12 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > if you have to disable ipv6 to make "the internet connection fast", the
> > setup
> > at your provider is broken - Debian comes with working out of the box
> > support
> > for ipv6, if you need to disable it to make the ne
Le Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:22:12PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> According to a quick look at the diff wikipedia page[1], unified diffs
> appeared in GNU diff 1.15, released in January 1991.
>
> 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff
>
> Time to move on?
Le Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:22:14PM +0
Hi Holger.
Holger Levsen (06/08/2009):
> http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze/processes_running_error.html and
> http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze/processes_running_error.html lists
> those packages.
Identical URLs? And for the sake of archiving for one, and for the sake
of people not always on
Charles Plessy (06/08/2009):
> So to summarise, you are suggesting me to write upstream that:
>
> 1) We want to review their patches,
> 2) We can not do this with context diffs,
> 3) We do want to actively reject non-unified diffs despite our tools work
> well with them,
Sure.
> 4) The rea
Hi KiBi,
On Donnerstag, 6. August 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Holger Levsen (06/08/2009):
> > http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze/processes_running_error.html and
> > http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze/processes_running_error.html lists
> > those packages.
> Identical URLs?
Gah. Forgot to s/sq
Cyril Brulebois (06/08/2009):
> But, since we tweak the headers, the check can get added before the
> first dereferencement. Of course, there are the fuzzy stuff with patch,
> but sounds less likely to happen.
Heh, might have left that to the attentive reader, but let's fix the
typo: s/before/aft
Cyril Brulebois (06/08/2009):
> Heh, might have left that to the attentive reader, but let's fix the
> typo: s/before/after/. :)
And given I wasn't even using the right option, I'm going to hide for a
while, lalala. (Thanks pusling.)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Charles Plessy (06/08/2009):
>> 4) The reason why they should adopt a new diff format is because it is new.
>
> It *was*. 20 years ago.
Perhaps it is about time it was made the default :)
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-
Holger Levsen, 2009-08-06 11:27:34 +0200 :
> Hi,
>
> as announced at DebConf9 I'll now (slowly) start threads about
> different bug categories detected by piuparts, with the aim to agree
> on mass filing bugs with the correct severity.
Thank you for this effort. I must admit piuparts has been to
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:52:08PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> So to summarise, you are suggesting me to write upstream that:
Why do you need to write anything to upstream? If they still insist on
context diffs (or whatever that is called), I guess there is not much we
can do. Debian insists
Hi Roland,
On Donnerstag, 6. August 2009, Roland Mas wrote:
> Thank you for this effort. I must admit piuparts has been too
> frightening for me to try, so far. So, in order to comfort me in my
> laziness, would you consider doing continuous (or regular) runs of
> piuparts on the whole archive,
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 6. August 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.org/piuparts/FAQ
> I'm subscribed to
> that page and would like to collect questions and answers there, instead of
> repeating myself endlessly ;-)
That might leave a wrong impression, so let me add: Thanks for asking
Holger Levsen, 2009-08-06 14:44:53 +0200 :
> Hi Roland,
>
> On Donnerstag, 6. August 2009, Roland Mas wrote:
>> Thank you for this effort. I must admit piuparts has been too
>> frightening for me to try, so far. So, in order to comfort me in my
>> laziness, would you consider doing continuous (o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: libgctp
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Abe_Taaheri abe_taah...@raytheon.com
* URL : http://gcmd.nasa.gov/records/USGS-GCTP.html
* License : Mixed public-domain and BSD
Programming L
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Oh, if you really need an example, what about the following? We tend to
> fix GCC issues. We tweak headers. Some might get added, some might be
> removed. We have such a patch. A CVE arrives. A context diff gets
> published. It gets applies on the top of the other patche
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:44:53PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Thank you for this effort. I must admit piuparts has been too
> > frightening for me to try, so far. So, in order to comfort me in my
> > laziness, would you consider doing continuous (or regular) runs of
> > piuparts on the whole
On 06/08/2009 Holger Levsen wrote:
> > And for the sake of archiving for one, and for the sake
> > of people not always online, could you please attach a package list /
> > dd-list next time?
>
> Will try to remember...
>
> The three packages of this are zope2.10-sandbox, zope2.10-sandbox and
Colleagues, I'm software engineer from Institute for System
Programing of Russian Academy of Sciences and we are developing a free
lightweight tool for checking backward/forward binary compatibility of
shared C/C++ libraries in OS Linux. It checks interface signatures and
data type definitions
So... you all realize, right, that old-style context diffs and unified
diffs can be trivially converted into each other? They have the same
amount of information.
filterdiff --format=unified < context.diff
filterdiff --format=context < unified.diff
(filterdiff comes with patchutils.) Gi
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:07:02PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> After deleting the following check, my source package builds fine.
>
> --- a/scripts/Dpkg/Source/Patch.pm
> +++ b/scripts/Dpkg/Source/Patch.pm
> @@ -325,9 +325,6 @@ sub analyze {
> unless (defined($_ = getline($diff_handle))
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:33:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Those are actually valid ed scripts IIRC.
Okay, sorry, I meant to remove that sentence that is actually wrong...
sorry 'bout that.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OO
Pierre Habouzit writes:
> FWIW I've read this sub-thread with some kind of consternation,
> especially seeing how wrong some arguments are.
>
> First of all, non-unified diffs are called "context diffs", and can have
> ... wait for it ... context. Those are actually valid ed scripts IIRC.
> The
This one time, at band camp, Gustavo Noronha Silva said:
> While at debconf I was debugging why epiphany-webkit (libsoup, really)
> was failing to get to Rhonda's blog, and it seems like DNS was resolving
> the name to the ipv6 address as well as the ipv4. It seems like firefox
> handles this by fa
[CCing you since I presume you are not subscribed to debian-devel]
[CCing the Debian release team since they may be interested]
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> Colleagues, I'm software engineer from Institute for System
> Programing of Russian Academy of Sciences an
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I think that you asked the key question, and that the answer will help us to
> sort out the metadata contents in Debian packages.
>
> Currently, debian/control contains:
>
> - Informations for the package manager (dpkg). For instance, the p
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ryan Niebur
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: abi-compliance-checker
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Andrey Ponomarenko
* URL :
http://ispras.linux-foundation.org/index.php/ABI_compliance_checker
* Lice
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libcatalyst-model-adaptor-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Jonathan Rockway
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Model-Adaptor/
* License
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libfile-queue-perl
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : Jason Lavold
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-Queue/
* License : Artistic | GPL-1+
Pro
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> How to split up the Packages/Sources files into more granular pieces
> would be nice, but which fields should go into which sets needs
> defining, and which set of sets should be the default. For
> compatability, it could continue to generate Pac
Hey Hun I just setup my webcam check it out! Check my cam Dear debiandevel! Get
Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now!
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jon Bernard
* Package name: lua-iconv
Version : 6
Upstream Author : Alexandre Erwin Ittner
* URL : http://luaforge.net/projects/lua-iconv/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
Description : iconv bindings for th
On Thu, Aug 06 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
> So... you all realize, right, that old-style context diffs and unified
> diffs can be trivially converted into each other? They have the same
> amount of information.
>
> filterdiff --format=unified < context.diff
> filterdiff --format=context <
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 367 (new: 5)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 124 (new: 2)
Total number of packages request
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libsub-current-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Rafael Garcia-Suarez
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Current/
* License : Artistic | GP
Hi!
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 18:38:41 +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> Colleagues, I'm software engineer from Institute for System
> Programing of Russian Academy of Sciences and we are developing a free
> lightweight tool for checking backward/forward binary compatibility of
> shared C/C++ lib
Le Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:26:02AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>
> (filterdiff comes with patchutils.) Given that, this seems like a tempest
> in a teapot to me. Just convert the diff into whatever format the tool
> that you're using expects or the reviewer wants to read.
Hi Russ and everybod
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Marc E."
* Package name: itaka
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Marc E.
* URL : http://itaka.jardinpresente.com.ar
* License : (GPL, CC-BY-SA-2.5)
Programming Lang: (Python)
Description : On-demand screen captu
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtext-reflow-perl
Version : 1.09
Upstream Author : Martin Ward
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Reflow/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming L
Pierre Habouzit writes:
> First of all, non-unified diffs are called "context diffs"
Not necessarily. I've been using the term to reply to *any* diff output
format that isn't unified-diff format. From my perspective, there is the
de facto standard of unified-diff format, used by the vast majorit
Ben Finney writes:
> Pierre Habouzit writes:
>
> > First of all, non-unified diffs are called "context diffs"
>
> Not necessarily. I've been using the term to reply to *any* diff output
> format that isn't unified-diff format.
s/reply to/refer to/
--
\ “One seldom discovers a true be
--cut--
> > The wiki-page with the latest release of binary compatibility checker
> > is http://ispras.linux-foundation.org/index.php/ABI_compliance_checker
>
> This looks like an extremely useful piece of software (in the past
> I've thought "I wish there were a tool to do this" :)). I'll pack
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.87dsf-2
Severity: wishlist
File: /etc/init.d/checkfs.sh
X-debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
I have an idea. Every few days when booting we encounter a file system
check, which takes several minutes. We sit there, helpless,
unable to issue any command. All we
46 matches
Mail list logo
