Paul Bone writes:
> This is mostly correct. Mercury is indeed self-hosting and was
> previously included in Debian. Mercury has a number of different
> backends two of these target C, high-level C and low-level C. The
> Mercury source distribution includes C intermediate files for the
> standa
On 28/07/09 at 10:58 +1000, Paul Bone wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 05:13:06PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 05:34:44PM +1000, Paul Bone wrote:
> > > * Package name: mercury
> > > Version : 0.13.1-rotd20090725
> > > Upstream Author : Mercury Group
>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:30:58AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 28/07/09 at 10:58 +1000, Paul Bone wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 05:13:06PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 05:34:44PM +1000, Paul Bone wrote:
> > > > * Package name: mercury
> > > > Version
Hi Goswin,
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> So I decided to write an introduction to the problem that focuses more
> on the user side, why we want multiarch at all, what goals and
> requirements are to be met and gives some pointers.
Thanks for this. I'm no
Hello,
I recall the not-so-welcomed initiative from 2006 to have some full-timers
employed to
speed up the release process. Since I am running only sid anyway, I was not
really
interested in that, particularly not at the time.
Now I think that we could make some good use of some full-timers. An
Hi,
since Steffen Moeller started a thread about paying Debian Developers, I got
the idea to ask the Debian community about it's opinion about "Guaranteed
minimum income"[1].
I've heard about the concept some weeks ago in a talk by Götz Werner[2] and
imediatly felt in love with the idea. I'll g
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 11:17 +0200 schrieb Steffen Moeller:
> * the web-pages team might possibly need more helping hands to implement
> what they want
> to implement and/or to coordinate the translations etc .. so they could get
> some more
> graphical skills in or .. they would need
At the moment, Virt-what can detect VMWare, Microsoft Versions of
Virtual PC, OpenVZ, Xen-HVM, Xen-DomU, Xen-Dom0, KVM, and QEMU.
That looks like Virt-what does not detect VirtualBox. Is it likely to
be added in the future?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.or
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> If this topic is not appropriate for this list, I beg your paddon.
debian-devel is for technical discussions. I don't believe there is
any debian list appropriate for your message.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNS
This mail should have been posted to debian-project, debian-devel is
for technical discussions.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dear Petter,
this is an excerpt from your last sysvinit upload's changelog:
sysvinit (2.87dsf-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Let sysv-rc depend on insserv (>= 1.12.0-10) to activate
dependency based boot sequencing by default.
Do you *REALLY* think that changing such important pieces of s
Mark Allums wrote:
> That looks like Virt-what does not detect VirtualBox. Is it likely to
> be added in the future?
Your question is better redirected at the Fedora-virt mailing list; they
develop this software, not us:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt
Alternatively, you c
On Jul 28, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> " Insserv will become essential together with sysv-rc, and is not
> supposed to be simple to remove any more. Dependency based boot
> sequencing is going to become the default and suppoted boot sequencing
> method. I'll remove the option to disable it. "
This i
Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 28, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
" Insserv will become essential together with sysv-rc, and is not
supposed to be simple to remove any more. Dependency based boot
sequencing is going to become the default and suppoted boot sequencing
method. I'll remove the option to disab
Chris Lamb wrote:
Mark Allums wrote:
That looks like Virt-what does not detect VirtualBox. Is it likely to
be added in the future?
Your question is better redirected at the Fedora-virt mailing list; they
develop this software, not us:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt
Alt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon McVittie
* Package name: telepathy-qt4
Version : 0.1.9
Upstream Author : the Telepathy project (© Collabora Ltd./Nokia Corporation)
* URL : http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/wiki/
* License : LGPL2.1+
Programming L
Steve Langasek writes:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> 4) Implementation (migration)
>
>> For most users activating multiarch would be a simple matter of
>> putting
>
>> Apt::Architectures {"amd64"; "i386";};
>
>> in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/mu
On Jul 28, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> - squeeze+1: true upstart: move all scripts to a event based system
How do you plan to remove insserv once it becomes essential?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:48:24PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > I don't think this configuration belongs to apt, I think it belongs to dpkg.
> I disagree, at least to a degree.
Me too.
>qemu-powerpc (or whatever it would
> be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: LI Daobing
* Package name: ibus-qt
Version : 1.2.0.20090728
Upstream Author : Huang Peng
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ibus
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : ibus qt4 input method plugin
I
Hi all,
I have recently uploaded to experimental eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch, from
our multiarch branch. It doesn't use the multiarch paths yet, but it is
a first step toward multiarch.
The only difference with the unstable version is that libc-bin and
libc-dev-bin are splitted out of libc6 and lib
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:15:00PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> >> The site www.artsoft.org is (temporary?) down. Why do You think it
> >> must be another way? Postinst returns error code because it can't
> >> download resource. Other packages (for example msttcorefonts) have
> >> the same be
On 19:39 Tue 28 Jul , Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
MM> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:15:00PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
The site www.artsoft.org is (temporary?) down. Why do You think it
must be another way? Postinst returns error code because it can't
download resource. Other pa
the "renamed debian/patches to debian/patch to avoid
3.0-quilt-by-default bug reports"
changelog in latest iptables makes me uncomfortable...
is it something we should all do eventually ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Hi,
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The only difference with the unstable version is that libc-bin and
> libc-dev-bin are splitted out of libc6 and libc6-dev. This way it
> complies with the Debian Policy requirement that the libraries should
> not contain binaries, which is also a requirement for mult
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Venkatesh Srinivas
* Package name: mk
Version : 20090728
Upstream Author : Russ Cox
* URL : http://swtch.com/plan9port/unix/
* License : Lucent Public License
Programming Lang: C
Description : A simple
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 at 23:39:32 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> $ apt-cache search telepathy |grep -i qt4
...
> libqttapioca0 - Qt4 tapioca library
...
> libqttelepathycore0 - core library for Qt4 telepathy
That's not the same library (sorry about the naming, I hadn't realised
telepathy-qt was also f
In article <4a6efb99.8060...@allums.com> you wrote:
> I somewhat favor VirtualBox, since Debian runs inside it very well and
> it runs on Debian very well, and it has the open-source edition.
> Occasionally, something like Virt-what might come in handy for me.
Virtualbox can be recognized by Ven
Hi,
Since a few days, on a stable machine (with stable, testing and
unstable sources for apt but APT::Default-Release set to "stable"),
"apt-get dist-upgrade" wants to install dash.
Can someone explain me why ? Is it due to the fact that dash is
essential in unstable ?
kooot:/home/vdanjean#
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:28:30AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > The only difference with the unstable version is that libc-bin and
> > libc-dev-bin are splitted out of libc6 and libc6-dev. This way it
> > complies with the Debian Policy requirement that the l
In article <200907282338.n6sncgxs059...@neskaya.eckenfels.net> you wrote:
> Virtualbox can be recognized by Vendor strings in BIOS, you can use
> biosdecode or lshw to find them. So I guess it is no big deal to extend
> virt-what to find those signatues.
It is actually dmidecode (used by virt-wha
Vincent Danjean (29/07/2009):
> kooot:/home/vdanjean# aptitude why dash
> i linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 Depends initramfs-tools (>= 0.55) | yaird (>=
> 0.0.13) | linux-initramfs-tool
> p yaird Depends dash
Got a winner here, I believe:
| -(cy...@talisker pts/8)-(~)
| $ rm
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Vincent Danjean (29/07/2009):
>> kooot:/home/vdanjean# aptitude why dash
>> i linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 Depends initramfs-tools (>= 0.55) | yaird (>=
>> 0.0.13) | linux-initramfs-tool
>> p yaird Depends dash
>
> Got a winner here, I believe:
> |
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article <4a6efb99.8060...@allums.com> you wrote:
I somewhat favor VirtualBox, since Debian runs inside it very well and
it runs on Debian very well, and it has the open-source edition.
Occasionally, something like Virt-what might come in handy for me.
Virtualbox can
34 matches
Mail list logo
