On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > * `Bug-` or `Bug` (optional)
> >
> > It contains one or more URLs (space separated) pointing to the related
> > bugs
> > (possibly fixed by the patch). The `Bug` field is reserved
> > for the bug URL(s) in the upstream bug tracker.
>
>
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> If the idea is to standarize metainformation, I would suggest standarizing
> filenaming scheme too. What I do in some packages is to name the patches as
> follows:
>
> 0xxx-name.patch -> Grabbed from upstream VCS
> 1xxx-name.patch -> Interesting for
On 17/06/09 at 09:04 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > * `Bug-` or `Bug` (optional)
> > >
> > > It contains one or more URLs (space separated) pointing to the
> > > related bugs
> > > (possibly fixed by the patch). The `Bug` field is reserv
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Samuel Thibault
* Package name: vite
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : vite-developpe...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
* URL : http://vite.gforge.inria.fr/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Efficient visu
Hello everybody,
I'll try to do some new proposals based on your feedback. But first let
me address the topic of the usefulness of the proposal. While there are
currently no tools making use of this format, I can imagine many
interesting usage for this information. It starts with the simple stats
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:12:02PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
> Does anyone know this code? It appears as though the gmt-coast-low is
> not sufficient for zyGrib and magics++,
> and I'm not familiar with the history of "gmt" beyond the README. Any
> ideas or recommendations as to how t
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:12:02PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on some packages for Debian Meteorology
> (http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Meteorology):
> magics++ , a plotting / graphics library / scripting system , and
> zyGrib, a GRIB (met. format) file viewer
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 17 Jun 2009 11:56:04 +0200, a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Samuel Thibault
>
>
> * Package name: vite
> Version : 1.0
> Upstream Author : vite-developpe...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> * URL : http://vite.gforge.inria.fr/
>
It seems that the support for Intel's Poulsbo chipset (Graphics GMA 500) for
Atom processor (US15) is sparse [1].
So far I have been able to find a driver package in Ubuntu Hardy [2].
I was wondering if anyone has ideas as to if Debian will get the support for
Poulsbo chipset.
If this is not t
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:42:55AM -0700, Kushal Koolwal wrote:
>
> It seems that the support for Intel's Poulsbo chipset (Graphics GMA 500) for
> Atom processor (US15) is sparse [1].
> So far I have been able to find a driver package in Ubuntu Hardy [2].
>
> I was wondering if anyone has ideas
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kushal Koolwal
* Package name: xserver-xorg-video-psb
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Intel Moblin
* URL : http://www.intel.com/products/mid/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C/C++
Description : Xorg Graphics dr
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'll try to do some new proposals based on your feedback. But first let
> me address the topic of the usefulness of the proposal. While there are
> currently no tools making use of this format, [...]
> In any case, it's a required step IMO if we want
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan
Wiltshire wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:42:55AM -0700, Kushal Koolwal wrote:
>>
>> It seems that the support for Intel's Poulsbo chipset (Graphics GMA 500) for
>> Atom processor (US15) is sparse [1].
>> So far I have been able to find a driver packa
I originally just sent this to debian-devel since I didn't see the bug
report on it, here are my comments on the bug report for posterity.
I'll keep debian-devel on CC. I've attached the forwarded message at
the end.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Kushal
Koolwal wrote:
> * Package name : xse
Or at least nice(1) those calls.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533019
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carl Chenet
* Package name: lshell
Version : 0.9.4
Upstream Author : Ignace Mouzannar
* URL : http://lshell.ghantoos.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : limited shell configurable per use
[I posted this on debian-gcc before. I have not gotten any reply there. So I
am trying my luck here]
Currently the default gfortran in Debian Sid points to 4:4.3.3-9 . The
gfortran-4.4 is already available, quite stable. Is there any reason why
gfortran 4.4 not the default?
The reason is that the
17 matches
Mail list logo
