Paul Wise wrote:
I note the GPLv2+ is probably not compatible with the MAME non-free
license. How does gmameui interact with MAME? Is the way it does that
likely to form a derivative work? If so we cannot distribute gmameui.
Yes, the MAME license restricts commercial use, and is thus non
gpl-c
As I forgot to CC the ITP bug to the list I want to do this now afterwards
and include a question:
The bugreport is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531587
After an initial view on the package Charles Plessy suggested to rename the
package to avoid confusion with the existing pack
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:50:50PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Nowadays, you cannot use your system if you don’t use udev, so this is
> irrelevant.
I'm writing this mail from a system without udev:
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.26-1-vserver-686 (Debian 2.6.26-12) (wa...@debian.or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: oasis3
Version : 3.3
Upstream Author : Sophie Valcke
* URL :
http://www.prism.enes.org/PAEs/coupling_IO/software_OASIS3.php
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Fortran
Description
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 10:58:31AM +0200, Federico Hernandez wrote:
> So the renamed package is now called taskwarrior and has been uploaded to
> mentors.debian.org (together with a RFS to the debain.-mentors
> mailiniglist).
>
> To superseed the old upload I increased the version number of the pa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ritesh Raj Sarraf
* Package name: apt-offline
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Ritesh Raj Sarraf
* URL : http://pypt-offline.sf.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Offline APT Package Mana
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Janos Guljas
* Package name: python-django-site-assets
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Branko Vukelic
* URL : http://github.com/foxbunny/django-site-assets
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: audex
Version : 0.71b2
Upstream Author : Marco Nelles
* URL : http://opensource.maniatek.de/cgi-bin/audex/audex/index.html
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Audi
On Jun 03, Carsten Hey wrote:
> I'm writing this mail from a system without udev:
Yes, and nobody cares much. Many functions of modern systems require
udev and more and more will with time.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 02:59:52PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Jun 03, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:50:50PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Nowadays, you cannot use your system if you don’t use udev, so this
> > is irrelevant.
> >
> > I'm writing this mail from a sy
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Julián Hernández Gómez"
* Package name: python-fixture
Version : 1.1.2
Upstream Author : Kumar McMillan
* URL : http://farmdev.com/projects/fixture/
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : P
[a failed build was wrongly assigned as a RC bug of texlive-base, and
since the reason was a problem on the buildd, I assigned it to
buildd.debian.org]
Luk Claes wrote:
> buildd.d.o is not the place to reassign bugs for particular buildds to.
> If it's just for particular buildds, you'd better
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Salvatore Bonaccorso
* Package name: liblatex-encode-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Andrew Ford
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/LaTeX-Encode/
* License : Perl
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Perl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Salvatore Bonaccorso
* Package name: liblatex-driver-perl
Version : 0.08
Upstream Author : Andrew Ford
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/LaTeX-Driver-0.08/
* License : Perl
Programming Lang: Perl
Description :
Frank Küster wrote:
> [a failed build was wrongly assigned as a RC bug of texlive-base, and
> since the reason was a problem on the buildd, I assigned it to
> buildd.debian.org]
>
> Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> buildd.d.o is not the place to reassign bugs for particular buildds to.
>> If it's just for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Stapelberg
* Package name: libtomcrypt
Version : 1.17
Upstream Author : Tom St Denis
* URL : http://www.libtomcrypt.com/
* License : Public Domain
Programming Lang: C
Description : public domain open sour
Luk Claes wrote:
>> And what should one do with a bug like this? At the moment it's quite
>> irrelevant whether one of our packages has a bogus RC bug. But what if
>> that happens when I'm hoping for a transition to testing?
>
> Are you now talking about the failure on hppa or the one on ia64 (
Frank Küster wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>
>>> And what should one do with a bug like this? At the moment it's quite
>>> irrelevant whether one of our packages has a bogus RC bug. But what if
>>> that happens when I'm hoping for a transition to testing?
>> Are you now talking about the failure on
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 01 juin 2009 à 16:26 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> > > What has the initramfs got to do with this?
> >
> > For / to be on LVM you need an initramfs. / on raid (with custom
> > kernel) or plain partition works without one.
>
> I already know that, than
On Wed, Jun 03 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> Luk Claes wrote:
>>
And what should one do with a bug like this? At the moment it's quite
irrelevant whether one of our packages has a bogus RC bug. But what if
that happens when I'm hoping for a transition to testin
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 02, "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" wrote:
>
>> - there is still a close windows in initram, and possibility
>> at early rc scripts.
> No.
>
>> - /var is still not mounted, so programs could not write they status, nor
>> log failures
> So programs which have such requirem
21 matches
Mail list logo
