Re: Vcs-Svn field and trunk

On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 09:09:48PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > If this is the consensus, should then Vcs-Browser point to trunk also? > Without having given it too much thought, I would suggest not. Instead > point it at the root of the repository. Why? Vcs-* are meant to be in sync, with -Br

Re: Bug#531221: okular: Arbitrarily enforces DRM

On Sun, 31 May 2009 14:19:12 +0200 Michael Banck wrote: > I like the advisory note somebody else proposed, i.e. "The author said > you shouldn't do this, do you want to do this anyway?". Whether or > not that dialog could get permanently ignored by the user could be > configurable. I can't think

Re: no deprecation of /usr as a standalone filesystem

Le lundi 01 juin 2009 à 16:26 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : > > What has the initramfs got to do with this? > > For / to be on LVM you need an initramfs. / on raid (with custom > kernel) or plain partition works without one. I already know that, thanks, but it still doesn’t make your poin

Re: no deprecation of /usr as a standalone filesystem

* Josselin Mouette [2009-06-02 10:53]: > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 à 16:26 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : > > > What has the initramfs got to do with this? > > > > For / to be on LVM you need an initramfs. / on raid (with custom > > kernel) or plain partition works without one. > > I already

Re: no deprecation of /usr as a standalone filesystem

Le mardi 02 juin 2009 à 11:22 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit : > Still that doesn't mean that the project should depricate support for a > separate /usr for the sake of udev. If some want to use an initramfs > less kernel let them have a functional system, same goes for those that > prefere a udev

Re: fstrcmp

On Sunday 31 May 2009 03:49:37 Peter Miller wrote: [...] >This goes for packages as well. Wouldn't it be great if > >apt-get install dns-utils > >instead of saying > >E: Couldn't find package dns-utils > >it said something more useful, like > >E: Couldn't find package dns-utils, did yo

Re: Bug#531221: okular: Arbitrarily enforces DRM

Harald Braumann wrote: >[1 ] >On Sun, 31 May 2009 14:19:12 +0200 >Michael Banck wrote: >> I like the advisory note somebody else proposed, i.e. "The author said >> you shouldn't do this, do you want to do this anyway?". Whether or >> not that dialog could get permanently ignored by the user co

Re: no deprecation of /usr as a standalone filesystem

Marco d'Itri wrote: This is relevant for udev becase kernel events can trigger the execution of programs at the very beginning of the boot when only the root is mounted. While currently packages can and do easily implement workarounds for this situation (like waiting in a loop for the files in /

Re: fstrcmp

Jérôme Pouiller writes: > On Sunday 31 May 2009 03:49:37 Peter Miller wrote: > [...] >>This goes for packages as well. Wouldn't it be great if >> >>apt-get install dns-utils >> >>instead of saying >> >>E: Couldn't find package dns-utils >> >>it said something more useful, like >> >>E:

Re: Bug#531450: ITP: gmameui -- front-end for the arcade games emulator MAME

Christian Marillat wrote: Loïc Martin writes: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Loïc Martin" * Package name: gmameui Version : 0.2.8 Upstream Author : Andrew Burton * URL : http://gmameui.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL2+ Programming Lang: C D

Re: no deprecation of /usr as a standalone filesystem

Josselin Mouette writes: > Le mardi 02 juin 2009 à 11:22 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit : >> Still that doesn't mean that the project should depricate support for a >> separate /usr for the sake of udev. If some want to use an initramfs >> less kernel let them have a functional system, same goe

Re: Bug#531221: okular: Arbitrarily enforces DRM

On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 06:59:03 -0300 David Bremner wrote: > Harald Braumann wrote: > > >[1 ] > >On Sun, 31 May 2009 14:19:12 +0200 > >Michael Banck wrote: > > >> I like the advisory note somebody else proposed, i.e. "The author > >> said you shouldn't do this, do you want to do this anyway?". >

Re: no deprecation of /usr as a standalone filesystem

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > This is a summary of last month's thread about the feasibility of > removing support for /usr on a standalone filesystem. > > The issue was raised by the udev upstream maintainer along with the udev > package maintainers of the major distribut

Re: Bug#531221: okular: Arbitrarily enforces DRM

Le mardi 02 juin 2009 à 06:59 -0300, David Bremner a écrit : > >I can't think of many dialogs that would be more useless than asking the > >user if he wants the software to forbid him to do what he asks it to do. > > Like the following, you mean? > > dulcinea:~/tmp % rm * > zsh: sure yo

Re: fstrcmp

On Tuesday 02 June 2009 12:32:47 Michael Poole wrote: > Jérôme Pouiller writes: [...] > > It is naive to think matching algorithm iterates on all items until > > it find the correct one. At least, algorithm use a sorted index > > with a dichotomy search. > > > > Nevertheless, your idea is interesti

Re: fstrcmp

On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 02:32:06PM +0200, Jérôme Pouiller was heard to say: > In another thread, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > I can't see how it'd work here, at least without the help of some > > on-disk structure, since we're talking about a space of 25,000 > > packages. > > Naive search of matchin

Re: stopped daemons starting again during upgrade

Hi Paul, Paul Wise wrote: [..] > I recently did an upgrade from lenny to squeeze. I did it in single > user mode / runlevel 1 (with all the daemons stopped). I noted that > during the upgrade various daemons were started again. IMO it is > reasonable to expect that stopped daemons stay stopped du

Re: fstrcmp

Jérôme Pouiller writes: > In another thread, Adeodato Simó wrote: >> I can't see how it'd work here, at least without the help of some >> on-disk structure, since we're talking about a space of 25,000 >> packages. > > Naive search of matching string under a set of 25,000 strings is > something li

Re: gdcm: The following packages have unmet dependencies

Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting a bizarre dep problem on alpha (only), see: > > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gdcm;ver=2.0.10-1;arch=alpha;stamp=1242615584 You wonder? There's no mono on alpha. > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > mono-devel: Depends

Bug#531590: ITP: libresample -- real-time audio resampling library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard * Package name: libresample Version : 0.1.3 Upstream Author : Julius O. Smith III * URL : http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/resample/Free_Resampling_Software.html * License : LGPL 2.1+ Programming La

Re: no deprecation of /usr as a standalone filesystem

On Jun 02, "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" wrote: > - there is still a close windows in initram, and possibility > at early rc scripts. No. > - /var is still not mounted, so programs could not write they status, nor > log failures So programs which have such requirements need to take care of waiting

Re: Bug#531450: ITP: gmameui -- front-end for the arcade games emulator MAME

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Loïc Martin wrote: > Christian Marillat wrote: >> Loïc Martin writes: >>> * License         : GPL2+ >> This package should go in contrib because he depends on non-free >> packages (mame-*). >> > > Right, since it depends on MAME (SDLMAME, XMAME - AFAIK only XMAME i

Bug#531601: ITP: ttytter -- console Twitter client

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thijs Kinkhorst * Package name: ttytter Version : 0.9.5 Upstream Author : Cameron Kaiser * URL : http://www.floodgap.com/software/ttytter/ * License : Floodgap Free Software License (no

Re: Vcs-Svn field and trunk

On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 09:13 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Why? Vcs-* are meant to be in sync, with -Browser being the > human-friendly facet to inspect what is in the repo. I fail to see why > it should point elsewhere. [...] > I think you are considering a svn-biased point of view. The notion

Bug#531616: RFP: ccl -- Clozure Common Lisp (formerly OpenMCL)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: ccl Version : 1.3 Upstream Author : Clozure Associates (Gary Byers) * URL or Web page : http://openmcl.clozure.com/ * License : LGPL with Lisp exception Description : Clozure Common Lisp (formerly OpenMCL) Ccl is a hig

Bestätigen Sie Ihre daten.

Lieber DHL-Kunde, wir haben derzeit Probleme mit unserem Packstation-System. Deswegen müssen wir Sie darum bitten, Ihre Daten bei uns zu verifizieren. Hier geht es zur Verifizierung: http://packstation.de.tf/ Sollten Sie die Verifizierung nicht im Zeitraum von 5 Werktagen durchführen, sehen wir

Re: no deprecation of /usr as a standalone filesystem

On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 12:54 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Josselin Mouette writes: > > What about those who want a system without libc? Did you think about > > them? > > Yes, we have uclibc for them. That's still libc. Would you take ucudev, uchal, and ucinitramfs to go with that? -- Gu

How to hack on DDTSS code ? (Re: DDTSS usage configuration for Japanese)

Hi, Anybody have any idea who's working on DDTSS code and how I can change some of its behaviors? At Fri, 29 May 2009 23:15:02 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for where to direct DDTSS related questions. > > I have the following request: > > 1. Japanese translation team

Help needed with /etc/X11/config/cf

Hi, It is my first time i instaled debian. I am enjoying it very much. I am trying to compile jk6 using sour make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/etc/X11/config/cf/Imake.tmpl', needed by `xmkmf'. Stop. I think this error is due to this IRULESRC=/etc/X11/config/cf which exists in the jdl Ma

Re: Help needed with /etc/X11/config/cf

Hi, Please consider posting this kind of questions to debian-user@ instead of -devel, where this is off-topic. Anyway, as for your problem: On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 23:56:15 +0100, alexe...@iol.pt wrote: > Hi, > It is my first time i instaled debian. I am enjoying it very much. > I am trying to

Re: Bug#531221: okular: Arbitrarily enforces DRM

On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 06:59:03AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Like the following, you mean? > > dulcinea:~/tmp % rm * > zsh: sure you want to delete all the files in /home/bremner/tmp [yn]? Just for the record, this is widely regarded as having been a poor design decision, and is onl

Re: Bug#531221: okular: Arbitrarily enforces DRM

Clint Adams wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 06:59:03AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: >> Like the following, you mean? >> >> dulcinea:~/tmp % rm * >> zsh: sure you want to delete all the files in /home/bremner/tmp [yn]? > > Just for the record, this is widely regarded as having been a poor

Re: Bug#531221: okular: Arbitrarily enforces DRM

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:59:15AM +0200, Sjors Gielen wrote: > May I ask why this is seen as a poor design decision? (Assuming that zsh > only asks this if the shell is interactive) Because it gives a false sense of security, trains people to be less careful, and doesn't handle all similar use ca

Re: How to hack on DDTSS code ? (Re: DDTSS usage configuration for Japanese)

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 06:42:12AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > At Fri, 29 May 2009 23:15:02 +0900, > Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > I'm looking for where to direct DDTSS related questions. > > > > I have the following request: > > > > 1. Japanese translation team would like to do review with > > de

Re: How to hack on DDTSS code ? (Re: DDTSS usage configuration for Japanese)

Quoting Junichi Uekawa (dan...@netfort.gr.jp): > Hi, > > Anybody have any idea who's working on DDTSS code and how I can change > some of its behaviors? That would be Martijn van Oosterhout who you CC'ed to this mail, apparently (and, IIRC, reads debian-i18n) Michael "Grisu" Bramer leads other t